Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T20:59:29.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Fiber/Matrix Interfaces by Transmission Electron Microscopy in Titanium Aluminide/Sic Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Cecil G. Rhodes
Cecil G. Rhodes*
Affiliation:
Rockwell International Science Center, 1049 Camino Dos Rios, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents examples of the use of transmission electron microscopy to characterize matrix/reinforcement interaction in titanium aluminide matrix composites reinforced with continuous SCS-6 type SiC. As a result of the high temperature required for consolidating this type composite, reaction products form in the interface. Using diffraction and x-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy techniques, reaction products in Ti3Al and Ti2AINb alloy matrix composites have been identified. TiC1 –x and Ti5 Si3 compounds are common in these composites, with AlTi3C also present depending on consolidation temperature and matrix composition. Residual stress calculations indicate that these reaction products may be subject to cracking during cooling from consolidationtemperatures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 273: Symposium Q – Intermetallic Matrix Composites II , 1992 , 17
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. McElman, J.A., in Engineering Materials Handbook: Composites, vol.1 (ASM International, Metals Park, OH, 1987) pp. 858–866.Google Scholar
2. Ning, X.J. and Piroux, P., J. Mater. Res. 6, 2234 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brindley, P.K., in High Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys II, edited by Stoloff, N.S. et al. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 81, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp. 419–424.Google Scholar
4. Bowder, D.M., Sastry, S.M.L., and Smith, P.R., Scripta Metal. 23, 407 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Baumann, S.F., Brindley, P.K., and Smith, S.D., Metall. Trans. 21A, 1559 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Rhodes, C.G., Bampton, C.C., and Graves, J.A. in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D.L. et al. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 194, Pittsburgh, PA 1990) pp. 349–354.Google Scholar
7. Baker, D.R., Doorbar, P.J., and Loretto, M.H. in Interfaces in Composites, edited by Pantano, C.G. and Chen, E.J.H. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 170, Pittsburgh, PA 1990) pp. 85–90.Google Scholar
8. Smith, P.R., Rhodes, C.G., and Revelos, W.C. in Interfaces in Metal-Ceramics Composites, edited by Lin, R.J. et al. (TMS, Warrendale, PA 1989) pp. 35–58.Google Scholar
9. Ritter, A.M., Hall, E.L., and Lewis, N. in Intermetallic Matrix Composites, edited by Anton, D.L. et al. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 194, Pittsburgh, PA 1990) pp. 413–421.Google Scholar
10. Rowe, R.G. in Microstructure/Property Relationships in Titanium Aluminides and Alloys, edited by Kim, Y-W and Boyer, R.R. (TMS, Warrencale, PA 1990) pp. 387–398.Google Scholar
11. Goretzki, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. 20, K141 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Rhodes, C.G. and Spurling, R.A. in Developments in Ceramic and Metal-Matrix Composites, edited by Upadhya, K. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
13. Rhodes, C.G. and Spurling, R.A. in Recent Advances in Composites in the United States and Japan, edited by Vinson, J.R. and Taya, M. (ASTM STP 864, Philadelphia, PA, 1985) pp. 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rhodes, C.G., Ghosh, A.K., and Spurling, R.A., Metall. Trans. 18A, 2151 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. van Loo, F.J.J. and Bastin, G.F., Metall. Trans. 20A, 403 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sarian, S., J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3305 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Yang, J-M and Jeng, S.M., Scripta Metall. 23, 1559 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Schuster, J.C., Nowotny, H., and Vacarro, C., J. Sol. Stat. Chem. V, 213 (1980)Google Scholar
19. Hahn, T., Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C.(private communication).Google Scholar
20. Reynolds, G., MSNW, Inc., San Marcos, CA (private communication).Google Scholar
21. Arnold, S.M., Arya, V.K., and Melis, M.E., NASA TM 103204, 1990.Google Scholar