Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:38:27.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Arsenic-Implanted Amorphous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Lynnita Knoch
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Advanced Custom Technology Center, 2200 W. Broadway Rd., Mesa, AZ 85202
N. David Theodore
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Advanced Custom Technology Center, 2200 W. Broadway Rd., Mesa, AZ 85202
Gordon Tam
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Advanced Custom Technology Center, 2200 W. Broadway Rd., Mesa, AZ 85202
Ron Pennell
Affiliation:
Motorola Inc., Advanced Custom Technology Center, 2200 W. Broadway Rd., Mesa, AZ 85202
Get access

Abstract

In this study, amorphous silicon and polycrystalline silicon films were implanted with arsenic and subjected to varied low temperature (<900°C) anneal conditions and characterized using TEM. The microstructure is of interest for later correlation with electrical measurements. The amorphous deposition produces larger, more irregular grains with more strain than does the polysilicon deposition for a single-step rapid thermal anneal (RTA) cycle. This can be explained by the number of critical nucleii and the rate of grain growth. The sheet resistivity, as measured by four-point probe, correlates to the deposition conditions. A two-stage anneal makes the grains less irregular by reducing the roughness of the grains and decreasing the strain in the grains. For a given deposition condition, the final microstructure is most strongly influenced by the first anneal. The second anneal produces no clear change in grain size. 800°C anneals result in larger grains than 900°C anneals. This is explained by the presence of less critical nucleii for 800°C anneals. In comparing short and long durations of RTA, the short duration produced slightly larger grains than the long duration RTA due to greater nucleation in the longer RTA wafers. In the case of RTA versus furnace anneals, RTA produces larger, more irregular grains, with more strain in the grains. A model in terms of the size of critical nucleii is used to explain the difference.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sun, S. W., Tsui, P. G. Y., Somero, B. M., Klein, J., Pintchovski, F., Yeargain, J. R., and Pappert, B., in IEDM Tech. Dig., 8588, 1991.Google Scholar
2. Kamins, T., Polycrystalline Silicon for Integrated Circuit Applications, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1988), p. 189197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Harame, D. L., Ganin, E., Comfort, J. H., Sun, J. Y. C., Acovic, A., Cohen, S. A., Ronsheim, P. A., Verdonckt-Vandebroek, S., Restie, P. J., Ratanaphanyarat, S., Saccamango, M. J., Johnson, J. B., and Furkay, S. A., in IEDM Tech. Dig., 645648, 1991.Google Scholar
4. Comfort, J. H., Crabbe, E. F., Cressler, J. D., Lee, W., Sun, J.Y.C., Malinowski, J., D'Agostino, M., Burghartz, J.N., Stork, J. M. C., and Meyerson, B. S., in IEDM Tech. Dig., 857860, 1991.Google Scholar
5. Knoch, L., Tarn, G., Theodore, N. D., and Pennell, R., presented at the 1992 Spring MRS Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 1992.Google Scholar