Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T00:27:24.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization and In Vitro Bioactivity Study of Ternary Glass-ceramic Coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Xanthippi Chatzistavrou
Affiliation:
kchatz@physics.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thesaloniki, Physics Department, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece, +30-2310-998015, +30-2310-994301
Eleana Kontonasaki
Affiliation:
kont@dent.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Dentistry, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Nikolaos Kantiranis
Affiliation:
kantira@geo.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Geology, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Lamprini Papadopoulou
Affiliation:
lambrini@geo.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Geology, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Petros Koidis
Affiliation:
pkoidis@dent.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Dentistry, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Evripides Hatzikraniotis
Affiliation:
evris@physics.auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Physics Department, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos
Affiliation:
kpar@auth.gr, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Physics Department, University Campus, Thessaloniki, GR 54124, Greece
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test the in vitro bioactive behavior of two new ternary mixtures consisting of a glass-ceramic porcelain, a bioactive glass and alumina (PBA) as coatings on dental glass ceramic substrates. They consisted of bioactive glass- in the system SiO2-Na2O-CaO-P2O5−, powder from a leucite-fluorapatite glass ceramic and γ-Al2O3 in 50-42.5-7.5 wt % respectively, while coatings with the same two components in 50-50 wt % ratio, without Al2O3, served as control. The characterization of the coatings was performed by Scanning Microscopy (SEM-EDS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). The in vitro bioactivity was tested in Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) and the surfaces of reacted specimens were examined by SEM and FTIR. All coatings presented rough surface, while FTIR spectra revealed the characteristic peaks of the crystallized phases in the bioactive glass network and dental glass ceramic, i.e. Sodium Calcium Silicate (Na4Ca4Si6O18), Leucite (KAlSi2O6) and Fluorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3F), and furthermore the very limited participation of Al3+ in the bioactive glass network. In the coatings the main phases detected by XRD were, also, Na4Ca4Si6O18 and Leucite, dispersed in an amorphous glassy matrix. Furthermore, a transformation of γ-Al2O3 to δ-Al2O3 was observed and a new phase of Nepheline (Na7.15Al7.2Si8.8O32) was detected in traces. Apatite was developed sporadically on the surfaces of the PBA coatings after 30 days in SBF. These results demonstrate a slight retardation of bioactive response of the coatings of the ternary mixtures compared to dual ones consisting of dental glass ceramic and bioactive glass. The incorporation of Al2O3 can enhance the mechanical properties without a substantial degradation of bioactivity. This finding renders these coatings as promising composite materials for potential dental applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kontonasaki, E., Papadopoulou, L., Zorba, T., Pavlidou, E., Paraskevopoulos, K. and Koidis, P., J. Oral Rehabil. 30, 893 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Sepulveda, P., Jones, J. R. and Hench, L. L., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 61, 301 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Jallot, E., Benhayoune, H., Kilian, L., Irigaray, J. L., Barbotteau, Y.,Balossier, G. and Bonhomme, P., Colloid, J.. Interface Sci. 233, 83 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Noma, T., Shoji, N., Wada, S. and Suzuki, T., J. Ceram. Soc. 101, 923 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Katoh, K. and Aoki, H., in Fine Ceramics Handbook, edited by Hamano, K., (Asakura Shoten, Tokyo, 1984), p. 410415.Google Scholar
6. El-Ghannam, A., Ducheyne, P. and Shapiro, I.M., Biomaterials 181, 295 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Kontonasaki, E., Sivropoulou, A., Papadopoulou, L., Garefis, P., Paraskevopoulos, K. and Koidis, P., J. Oral Rehabil. 34 57(2007).Google Scholar
8. Mazza, D., Borlera, M. Lucco, Brisi, C. and Onida, B.. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17, 951 (1997).Google Scholar
9. D, Ross S.., in The infrared spectra of minerals, edited by Farmer, VC, (Adlard & Son LTD Bartholomew Press, Surrey, 1974), p. 383422.Google Scholar
10. P, Filho O., P, LaTorre G. and L, Hench L., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30, 509 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Hölland, W., Rheinberger, V. and Schweiger, M., Adv. Eng. Mater. 3, 768 (2001).Google Scholar