Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T19:05:41.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boundary Layer Temperature Profile in Diamond CVD System Using Laser-Induced Fluorescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Qingyu Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Jon L. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
David L. Hofeldt
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The gas temperature of a radio-frequency thermal plasma has been measured by laser-induced fluorescence along the axis of the plasma jet near the substrate surface. The temperature was determined from the rotational population distribution of OH radicals. From the measured temperature profile, the freestream temperature was found to be about 3400 K and the boundary layer thickness was determined to be about 1 mm. A numerical model including carbonhydrogen- argon kinetics was used to predict species concentrations near the surface of the substrate. The results indicate that all CHa radical concentrations increase with freestream temperature for temperatures between 2500-4000 K. Of the C1 radicals, methyl has the highest concentration in this range in our system, which is consistent with other reports that methyl is an important diamond growth species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Celii, F. G. and Butler, J. E., Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 42, p. 643 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Ashfold, M. N. R., May, P. W. and Rego, C. A., Chem. Soc. Rew., p. 21 (1994).Google Scholar
3. Raiche, G. A. and Jeffries, J. B., Appl. Optics 32, p. 4629 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Green, D. S., Owano, T. G., Williams, S., Goodwin, D. G., Zare, R. N. and Kruger, C. H., Science 259, p. 1726 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Yu, B. W. and Girshick, S. L., J. App. Phys. 75, p. 3914 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Corat, E. J. and Goodwin, D. G., J. Appl. Phys. 74, p. 2021 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Girshick, S. L., Li, C., Yu, B. W. and Han, H., Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 13, p. 169 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Huang, D. and Frenklach, M., J. Phys. Chem. 96, p. 1868 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Seki, H., Yamada, T., Chuang, T. J., Chin, R. P., Huang, J. Y. and Shen, Y. R., Diamond and Related Materials 2, p. 567 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Spear, K. E. and Frenklach, M., Pure & Appl. Chem. 66, p. 1773 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Saito, Y., Sato, K., Gomi, K., and Miyadera, H., J. Mater. Res. 25, p. 1246 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Chang, C. P., Flamm, D. L., Ibbotson, D. E., and Mucha, J. A., J. Appl. Phys. 63, p. 1744 (1988).Google Scholar