Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T22:29:52.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bio-based Polyurethane-clay Nanocomposite Foams: Systheses and Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Min Liu
Affiliation:
mliu@pittstate.edukekesiemens@gmail.com, Pittsburg State University, Kansas Polymer Research Center, Pittsburg, Kansas, United States
Zoran S. Petrovic
Affiliation:
zpetrovi@pittstate.edu, Pittsburg State University, Kansas Polymer Research Center, Pittsburg, Kansas, United States
Yijin Xu
Affiliation:
yxu@pittstate.edu, Pittsburg State University, Kansas Polymer Research Center, Pittsburg, Kansas, United States
Get access

Abstract

Starting from a bio-based polyol through modification of soybean oil, BIOH™ X-210, two series of bio-based polyurethanes-clay nanocomposite foams have been prepared. The effects of organically-modified clay types and loadings on foam morphology, cell structure, and the mechanical and thermal properties of these bio-based polyurethanes-clay nanocomposite foams have been studied with optical microscopy, compression test, thermal conductivity, DMA and TGA characterization. Density of nanocomposite foams decreases with the increase of clay loadings, while reduced 10% compressive stress and yield stress keep constant up to 2.5% clay loading in polyol. The friability of rigid polyurethane-clay nanocomposite foams is high than that of foam without clay, and the friability for nanofoams from Cloisite® 10A is higher than that from 30B at the same clay loadings. The incorporation of clay nanoplatelets decreases the cell size in nanocomposite foams, meanwhile increases the cell density; which would be helpful in terms of improving thermal insulation properties. All the nanocomposite foams were characterized by increased closed cell content compared with the control foam from X-210 without clay, suggesting the potential to improve thermal insulation of rigid polyurethane foams by utilizing organically modified clay. Incorporation of clay into rigid polyurethane foams results in the increase in glass transition temperature: the Tg increased from 186 to 197 to 204 °C when 30B concentration in X-210 increased from 0 to 0.5 to 2.5%, respectively. Even though the thermal conductivity of nanocomposite foams from 30B is lower than or equal to that of rigid polyurethane control foam from X-210, thermal conductivity of nanocomposite foams from 10A is higher than that of control at all 10A concentrations. The reason for this abnormal phenomenon is not clear at this moment; investigation on this is on progress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Guo, A., Javni, I., Petrovic, Z.S.. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 77(2), 467 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000711)77:2<467::AID-APP25>3.0.CO;2-F3.0.CO;2-F>Google Scholar
2 Pavlidou, S., Papaspyrides, C.D.. Progress in Polymer Science 33, 1119 (2008).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008Google Scholar
3 Cao, X., Lee, L.J., et al. Polymer 46(3): 775783 (2005).10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.028Google Scholar
4 Lee, L.J., Zeng, C., Cao, X., Han, X., Shen, J., Xu, G.. Composites Science and Technology, 65, 2344 (2005).10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.016Google Scholar
5 Widya, T. and Macosko, C. W.. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B: Physics, 44, 897 (2005).10.1080/00222340500364809Google Scholar
6 Harikrishnan, G., Patro, T. Umasankar, and Khakhar, D.V.. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 7126 (2006).10.1021/ie0600994Google Scholar
7 Thirumal, M., Khastgir, Dipak, Singha, N.K., Manjunath, B.S., and Naik, Y.P.. Cellular Polymers. 26, 245 (2007).10.1177/026248930702600402Google Scholar