Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:05:39.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomistic Mechanism of Nucleation and Growth of Voids in Cu Studied by Computer Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Y. Shimomura
Affiliation:
Applied Physics and Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, JAPAN
I. Mukouda
Affiliation:
Applied Physics and Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

A TEM observation of fission neutron-irradiated copper at 300°C shows that the maximum size of stacking fault tetrahedra (sft) observed is 6 nm of edge length which corresponds to a cluster of 280 vacancies and the minimum size of voids is 2.2 nm in diameter which corresponds to a cluster of 470 vacancies. The result suggests that a vacancy cluster whose size is smaller than 300 vacancies grows to sft while a cluster whose size is larger than 500 vacancies relaxes to a void in 300°C-irradiated copper. A computer simulation of molecular dynamics (MD) with an isotropic EAM potential examined this model. It is found that a vacancy cluster that is smaller than 300 vacancy segregates to a (111) platelet and relaxes to an sft. Small vacancy clusters which are generated at damage cascade cores aggregate to spherically distributed vacancies for the size of more than 500 vacancies, and relax to several (111) platelets, which finally form a vacancy (111) polyhedron. Inside a polyhedral vacancy platelet, vacancies are confined and grow to a void at high temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shimomura, Y. and Mukouda, I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 540, 527 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Nishiguchi, R., Dr. Thesis (Hiroshima University), (1991).Google Scholar
3. Shimomura, Y., Mukouda, I. and Sugio, K., J. Nucl. Mater., 251, 61 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Nishiguchi, R. and Shimomura, Y., Mater. Trans. JIM., 41, 1168 (2000).Google Scholar
5. Mukouda, I., Shimomura, Y., Iiyama, T., Harada, Y., Katano, Y., Nakazawa, T., Yamaki, D. and Noda, K., J. Nucl. Mater., 283–287, 302 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Mukouda, I. and Shimomura, Y., J. Nucl. Mater., 271&272, 230 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev., B29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Stobbs, W. M. and Sworn, C. H., Phil. Mag., 24, 1365 (1971).Google Scholar
9. Shimomura, Y. and Nishiguchi, R., Radiat. Eff. Def. Solids, 141, 311 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Mukouda, I. and Y. Shimomura to be published in this volume.Google Scholar