Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:45:10.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the Natural Performance of Felsic Tuffs Using the Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd Systems-A Study of the Altered Zone in the Topopah Spring Member, Paintbrush Tuff, Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Zell E. Peterman
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 963, Box 25046 DFC, Denver, CO 80225
Richard W. Spengler
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 963, Box 25046 DFC, Denver, CO 80225
Kiyoto Futa
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 963, Box 25046 DFC, Denver, CO 80225
Brian D. Marshall
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 963, Box 25046 DFC, Denver, CO 80225
Shannon A. Mahan
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 963, Box 25046 DFC, Denver, CO 80225
Get access

Abstract

Core samples of the Topopah Spring Member of the Paintbrush Tuff from drill hole UE25A#1 were analyzed for Sr and Nd isotopes and selected minor and trace elements to constrain the origin of a zcolitized zone associated with the lower vitrophyre. The Sm-Nd radiogenic isotope system was unperturbed by the alteration, but the Rb-Sr system was severely disturbed in the altered zone. The thick, densely welded high-silica rhyolite is remarkably uniform in composition with only a slight decrease in initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios with depth (0.7129–0.7125). Quartz latite in the upper part of the Topopah Spring has significantly lower initial Sr isotope ratios (0.7095–0.7114). Locally in the altered zone, Sr and Ca were gained in substantial amounts, and K, Rb, and Y were removed. Ti, Zr, Nb, Ba, La, Ce, Sm, and Nd were relatively immobile during the alteration. Sr added to the altered zone had an isotopic composition of 0.7119 ± 0.0002 and was probably derived from dissolution of glass in the bulk Topopah Spring (high silica rhyolite + quartz latite) and transported downward by infiltration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Swadley, W C, Hoover, D.L., Rosholt, J.N., U.S. Geol, Survey Open-File Rept, 84 –788, 42 (1984).Google Scholar
[2] Winograd, I.J., Science 12, 14571464 (1981).Google Scholar
[3] Roseboom, E.H. Jr, U.S. Geol. Survey Circ, 903, 21 (1983).Google Scholar
[4] Brookins, D.G., Geochemical Aspects of Radioactive Waste Disposal (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984), 347.Google Scholar
[5] Stuckless, J.S., Chem. Geol. 55, 215225 (1986).Google Scholar
[6] Peterman, Z.E., Kamineni, D.C., Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. Report AECL-10120, 64 (1990).Google Scholar
[7] Krauskopf, K.B., Chem. Geol. 55, 323335 (1986).Google Scholar
[8] Milnes, A.G., Geology and Radwaste, (Academic Press, London, 1985), 328.Google Scholar
[9] Spengler, R.W., Fox, K.F. Jr, Rad. Waste Mgmt. and Nuc. Fuel Cycle 13, 2136 (1989).Google Scholar
[10] Diehl, S.F., Chornack, M.P., U.S. Geol, Survey Open-File Rept. 89 –3, 152 (1990).Google Scholar
[11] Hamilton, W.B., in U.S. Geol, Survey Bull, 1790, 5185 (1988).Google Scholar
[12] Robison, J.H., U.S. Geol, Survey Water-Res. Invest. Rept. 84 –4197, 8 (1984).Google Scholar
[13] Lipman, P.W., Christiansen, R.L., O’Connor, J.T., U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Pap. 524F, F1–F47 (1966).Google Scholar
[14] Schuraytz, B.C., Vogel, T.A., J. Geophys. Res. 94, 59255942 (1989).Google Scholar
[15] Flood, T.P., Vogel, T.A., Schuraytz, B.C., 1989, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 59435960 (1989)Google Scholar
[16] Broxton, D.E., Warren, R.G., Byers, F.M., J. Geophys. Res. 94, 59615985 (1989).Google Scholar
[17] Noble, D.C., Hedge, C.E., U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Pan. 650C, C133C139 (1969).Google Scholar
[18] Johnson, C.M., Geology 17, 11361139 (1989).Google Scholar
[19] Broxton, D.E., Bish, D.L., Warren, R.G., Clays and Clay Mineral. 35, 89110 (1987).Google Scholar
[20] Spengler, R.W., Peterman, Z.E., in Chemistry and Migration Behavior of Actinides and Fission Products in the Geosphere, (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, 1989), pp. 5455.Google Scholar
[21] Carlos, B.A., Los Alamos Report LA-10415-MS, 55 (1985); LA-10927-MS, 32 (1987).Google Scholar
[22] Levy, S.S., O’Neil, J.R., Chem. Geol. 76, 321326 (1989).Google Scholar
[23] Smyth, J.R., J. Geol. 90, 195201 (1982).Google Scholar
[24] Bish, D.L., in High Level Radioactive Waste Management, (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, 1990), pp. 596602.Google Scholar
[25] Spengler, R.W., Muller, D.C., Livermore, R.B., U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 791244, 43 (1979).Google Scholar
[26] Gladney, E.S., Burns, C.E., Geostand. Newslet. 7, 3226 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Bish, D.L., Chipera, S.J., Los Alamos Report LA-11497-MS, 68 (1989).Google Scholar
[28] Tegtmeyer, K.J., Farmer, G.L., Geology 18, 59 (1990).Google Scholar
[29] Sawyer, D.A., Fleck, R.J., Lanphere, M.A., Warren, R.G., Broxton, D.E., EOS 71, 1296 (1990); D.A. Sawyer (private communication)Google Scholar
[30] Faure, G., Principles of Isotope Geology (John Wiley, New York, 1986), 589.Google Scholar
[31] Farmer, G.L., DePaolo, D.J., Econ. Geol. 82, 11421151 (1987).Google Scholar
[32] Sturchio, N.C, Muehlenbachs, K., Seitz, M.G., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 16191631 (1986).Google Scholar
[33] Broxton, D.E. (private communication)Google Scholar
[34] Marshall, B.D., Peterman, Z.E., Futa, K., Stuckless, J.S., Mahan, S.A., Downey, J.S., Gutentag, E.D., in High Level Radioactive Waste Disposal, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, 1990), pp. 921923; unpublished data.Google Scholar
[35] McKinley, P.W., Long, M.P., Benson, L.V., U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept, (in press).Google Scholar
[36] White, A.R., Claassen, H.C., Benson, L.V., U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Pap. 1535O, 34 (1980).Google Scholar