Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:01:18.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arsenic and Antimony Doping: An Attempt to Deposit n-type CVD Diamond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Paul William May
Affiliation:
paul.may@bris.ac.uk, University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom, +44 (0)117 9289927, +44 (0)117 9251295
Martin Davey
Affiliation:
m.davey@bris.ac.uk, University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
Keith N Rosser
Affiliation:
Keith.Rosser@bristol.ac.uk, University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
Peter J Heard
Affiliation:
Peter.Heard@bristol.ac.uk, University of Bristol, Interface Analysis Centre, 121 St. Michael's Hill, Bristol, BS2 8BS, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

We report the results of experiments that attempt to deposit n-type CVD diamond in a standard hot filament reactor using 1%CH4/H2 gas mixtures, using (i) AsH3 as a gas phase source of arsenic, and (ii) evaporated Sb or Sb(Ph)3 as a source of antimony. SIMS measurements revealed that under these conditions, neither Sb nor As is incorporated into the diamond film, and the Raman spectra, electrical conductivity and crystallite morphology remain unchanged from that of undoped diamond. These experiments confirm the predicted low incorporation efficiency for As and Sb, and we conclude that doping CVD diamond with these elements cannot readily be achieved in this manner.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kalish, R., Diamond Relat. Mater. 10, (2001) 1749.10.1016/S0925-9635(01)00426-5Google Scholar
2. Sque, S.J., Jones, R., Goss, J. P. and Briddon, P. R., Phys. Rev. Letts. 92 (2004) 017402.Google Scholar
3. Goss, J.P., Briddon, P.R., Jones, R., Sque, S., Diamond Relat. Mater. 13 (2004) 684.Google Scholar
4. Correia, J.G., Marques, J.G., Alves, E., Forkel-Wirth, D., Jahn, S.G., Restle, M., Dahner, M., Hofsäss, H., Bharuth-Ram, K., ISOLDE Collaboration, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 127–128, (1997) 723.10.1016/S0168-583X(96)01165-2Google Scholar
5. Quintel, H., Bharuth-Ram, K., Hofsäss, H., Restle, M., Ronning, C., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 118, (1996) 72.Google Scholar
6. Hunn, J.D., Parikh, N. R. and Swanson, M. L., Zuhr, R. A., Diamond Relat. Mater. 2 (1993) 847.Google Scholar
7. Sparrow, G.R., “Quantitative SIMS approximations for general applications in surface analysis”. 25th Annual conference on mass spectroscopy and allied topics, (Washington DC., 1977).Google Scholar
8. O'Neill, M.E., Wade, K., in Comprehensive organometallic chemistry, ed. Wilkinson, G., Stone, F.G.A., Abel, E.W., Vol.1, p.5 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar