Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:55:20.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Americium Speciation and Distribution Coefficients in a Granitic Ground Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Gary W. Beall
Affiliation:
United Catalysts, Inc., P.O. Box 32370, Louisville, KY 40232, USA
William W.-L. Lee
Affiliation:
R.F. Weston, Inc., 2301 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
Abraham E. Van Luik
Affiliation:
Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Get access

Abstract

We call attention to the possible importance of pH-dependent speciation in determining the distribution coefficient of americium in a granitic ground water. We obtained experimental distribution coefficients for americium. We used the geochemical code PHREEQE to calculate the amount present of americium complexes with hydroxides and carbonates over a range of pH, using formation constants taken from the literature and one estimated for AmOHCO3, a neutral complex suspected of playing an important role in the aqueous chemistry of americium, although not experimentally evaluated. Combining the above inputs, we calculated individual distribution coefficients for americium complexes. We are able to show that the batch distribution coefficient for americium can be seen as the sum of individual distribution coefficients of various complexes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sheppard, M.I., Beals, D.I., Thibault, D.H. and O'Connor, P., Soil Nuclide Distribution Coefficients and their Statistical Distributions. AECL-8364 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Beall, G.W. and Allard, B., 1981. in Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions, edited by Tewari, P.H. (Plenum, New York, 1981) pp. 193212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D.C. and Plummer, L.N., USGS Water Resources Investigations 80–96, revised 1982.Google Scholar
4. Brookin, D.G., Geochemical Aspects of Radioactive Waste Disposal, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Allard, B. and Beall, G.W., in Proceedings of a Workshop on the Environmental Chemistry of the Actinide Elements, Warrenton, VA, 1978.Google Scholar
6. Allard, B., Olofsson, U. and Torstenfelt, B., Inorg. Chemica Acta, 94, 205 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Edelstein, N., Bucher, J., Silva, R. and Nitsche, H., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-14325, 1983.Google Scholar
8. Kerrisk, J.F., Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-10040-MS, 1984.Google Scholar
9. Rai, D., Strickert, R.G., Moore, D.A. and Serne, R.J., Geochem Cosmochim Acta, 45, 2257 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bidoglio, G., Avogardo, A., de Plano, A. and Lazzari, G.P., Radioactive Waste Management and the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, 5, 311 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Muller, A.B., Radioactive Waste Management & the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, 6, 19 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Phillips, S.L., Phillips, C.A. and Skeen, J., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-14996, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Beall, G.W., Mulligan, W.O. and Mroczkowski, S., Acta Cryst., B 32, 11 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Silva, R.J. and Nitsche, H., in NRC Nuclear Waste Geochemistry '83, edited by Alexander, D.H. and Birchard, G.F., NUREG/CP-0052. p.70.Google Scholar
15. Silva, R.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, edited by McVay, G.L. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1984) pp. 875881.Google Scholar
16. Silva, R.J., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCRL-91821, 1985.Google Scholar
17. Bernkopf, M.F. and Kim, J.I., Inst. fur Radiochimie der Tech. Univ. Munchen RCM-02884, 1984.Google Scholar
18. Fried, S., Friedman, A.M., Hines, J.J., Atcher, R.W., Quarterman, L.A. and Volesky, A., in Actinides in the Environment, edited by Friedman, A.M. (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1976).Google Scholar