Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:16:06.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alteration of Uranium-Rich Microlite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

R. Gieré
Affiliation:
Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1397, USA; Email:giere@purdue.edu
E. C. Buck
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA
R. Guggenheim
Affiliation:
SEM Laboratory, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
D. Mathys
Affiliation:
SEM Laboratory, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
E. Reusser
Affiliation:
Mineralogy & Petrography, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
J. Marques
Affiliation:
PO Box 2072, Maputo, Mozambique
Get access

Abstract

Microlite, a Ta-rich member of the pyrochlore group, occurs in 440 Ma old lithium pegmatites in Mozambique and exhibits a pronounced growth zoning, with a U-free core surrounded by a U-rich rim (UO2 ≤ 17 wt%). Subsequent to the uplift of the host rock, microlite was subjected to intense low-temperature alteration during which Na, Ca and F were leached from the microlite crystals. This alteration, resulting from exposure to tropical conditions, also led to localized redistribution of radiogenic Pb (formation of plumbomicrolite) and to hydration of microlite, but U remained immobile. The low-temperature alteration effects are only observed in the U-rich rim, which is characterized by abundant microfractures. As demonstrated by electron diffraction images and powder X-ray patterns, the U-rich rim is largely metamict. Our investigation illustrates the importance of natural analogues in evaluating the durability of pyrochlore-based nuclear waste-form materials over geologic time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vance, E.R., Ball, C.J., Day, R.A., Smith, K.L., Blackford, M.G., Begg, B.D. and Angel, P.J., Journal of Alloys and Compounds 213/214, 406409, 1994.Google Scholar
2. Buck, E.C., Chamberlain, D.B. and Gieré, R., in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII, edited by Wronkiewicz, D.J. and Lee, J.H., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 556, Boston, USA, 1999, p. 1926 Google Scholar
3. Harker, A.B., in: Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C., eds., pp. 335392, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
4. Ewing, R.C., Weber, W.J. and Clinard, F.W., Progress in Nuclear Energy 29(2), 63127, 1995.Google Scholar
5. Hogarth, D.D., American Mineralogist 62, 403410, 1977.Google Scholar
6. Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F., Recherches Aérospatiales 1984–3, 167192, 1984.Google Scholar
7. Neves, J.M. Correia, Nunes, J.E. Lopes and Lucas, D.B., Revista de Ciências Geológicas, LourenÇo Marques, Série A 4, 3542, 1971.Google Scholar
8. Knorring, O. Von and Fadipe, A., Bulletin de Minéralogie 104, 496507, 1981.Google Scholar
9. Gieré, R., Swope, R.J., Buck, E., Guggenheim, R., Mathys, D. and Reusser, E., in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIII, edited by Smith, R.W. and Shoesmith, D.W., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 608, Boston, USA, 2000, p. 519524 Google Scholar
10. Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., Physics and Chemistry of Minerals 16, 220, 1988.Google Scholar
11. Vose, R.S., Schmoyer, R.L., Steurer, P.M., Peterson, T.C., Heim, R., Karl, T.R. and Eischeid, J.K., Global Historical Climatology Network, National Climatic Data Center, 2000.Google Scholar
12. Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., American Mineralogist 77, 179188, 1992.Google Scholar
13. Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., American Mineralogist 80, 732743, 1995.Google Scholar
14. Lumpkin, G.R. and Ewing, R.C., American Mineralogist 81, 12371248, 1996.Google Scholar