Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-qtg9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-03T07:40:58.567Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistive Electrical Switching of Cu+ and Ag+ based Metal-Organic Charge Transfer Complexes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Robert Mueller ,
Joris Billen ,
Aaron Katzenmeyer ,
Ludovic Goux ,
Dirk J. Wouters ,
Jan Genoe  and
Paul Heremans
Robert Mueller
Affiliation:
robert.muller@imec.be, IMEC v.z.w., PT\SOLO\PME, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium, 0032-16281908, 0032-16281097
Joris Billen
Affiliation:
j.billen@scarlet.be, IMEC v.z.w., PT\SOLO\PME, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
Aaron Katzenmeyer
Affiliation:
akatzenmeyer@gmail.com, IMEC v.z.w., PT\SOLO\PME, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
Ludovic Goux
Affiliation:
Ludovic.Goux@imec.be, IMEC v.z.w., PT\CMOSRD\MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
Dirk J. Wouters
Affiliation:
Dirk.Wouters@imec.be, IMEC v.z.w., PT\CMOSRD\MEMORY, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
Jan Genoe
Affiliation:
Jan.Genoe@imec.be, IMEC v.z.w., PT\SOLO\PME, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
Paul Heremans
Affiliation:
Paul.Heremans@imec.be, IMEC v.z.w., PT\SOLO, Kapeldreef 75, Leuven, 3001, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Memory cells based on Cu+ and Ag+ metal-organic charge-transfer complexes, as for example CuTCNQ (where TCNQ denotes 7,7',8,8'-tetracyanoquinodimethane), are well known for their bistable resistive electrical switching since 1979. The switching mechanism however remained unclear for very long time. In this contribution we describe the different views (bulk vs. interfacial switching), give evidence for interfacial switching in the case of CuTCNQ, and present a model allowing explaining the bipolar resistive electrical switching by an interfacial effect, even for experiments considered until now as proof for bulk switching. The proposed switching mechanism is based on bridging of an ion-permeable layer (or gap) by conductive Cu channels, which are formed and dissolved by an electrochemical reaction implying monovalent Cu+ cations, originating from a solid ionic conductor (as for example CuTCNQ). The model was furthermore generalized to other memory systems consisting of a permeable layer and a solid ionic conductor, including also inorganic solid ionic conductors as for example Ag2S.

Keywords

memoryionic conductormetal-insulator transition
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1071: Symposium F – Materials Science and Technology for Nonvolatile Memories , 2008 , 1071-F06-04
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.http://www.itrs.net/Links/2006Update/2006UpdateFinal.htm (last accessed on 7th April 2008)Google Scholar
2. Baek, I.G. Lee, M.S. Seo, S. Lee, M.J. Seo, D.H. Suh, D.S. Park, J.C. Park, S.O. Kim, H.S. Yoo, I.K. Ching, U.I. and Moon, J.T. Electron Devices Meeting, 2004. IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International, 587 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Hudgens, S. and Johnson, B. MRS Bull. 29, 829 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kozicki, M.N. Park, M. and Mitkova, M. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 4, 331 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Kozicki, M.N. Balakrishnan, M. Gopalan, C. Ratnakumar, C. and Mitkova, M. Non-Volatile Mem. Technol. Symp. (2005), 83.Google Scholar
6. Kaeriyama, S. Sakamoto, T. Sunamura, H. Mizuno, M. Kawaura, H. Hasegawa, T. Terabe, K. Nakayama, T. and Aono, M. IEEE J Solid-State Circ. 40, 168 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Meijer, G. Science 319, 1625 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Yang, Y. Ma, L. and Wu, J. MRS Bull. 29, 833 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Scott, J.C. and Bozano, L.D. Adv. Mat. 19, 1452 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ling, Q.-D. Liaw, D.-J. Teo, E. Y.-H. Zhu, C. Chan, D. S.-H. Kang, E.-T. and Neoh, K.-G. Polymer 48, 5182 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Potember, R.S. Poehler, T.O. and Cowan, D.O. Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 405 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kever, T. Nauenheim, C. Böttger, U., and Waser, R. Thin Solid Films 515, 1893 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Müller, R., Billen, J. Naulaerts, R. Rouault, O. Goux, L. Wouters, D.J. Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 997, 101–10 (2007)Google Scholar
14. Müller, R., Jonge, S. De, Myny, K. Wouters, D.J. Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 223501 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Müller, R., Goux, L. Wouters, D.J. Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. (unpublished)Google Scholar
16. Oyamada, T. Tanaka, H. Matsushige, K. Sasabe, H. and Adachi, C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1252 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Müller, R., Naulaerts, R. Billen, J. Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 063503 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Potember, R.S. Poehler, T.O. Rappa, A. Cowan, D.O. and Bloch, A.N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 3659 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Kamitsos, E.I. Tzinis, C.H. and Risen, W.M. Jr., Solid State Commun. 42, 561 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Matsumoto, M. Nishio, Y. Tachibana, H. Nakamura, T. Kawabata, Y. Samura, H. and Nagamura, T. Chem. Lett. 1021 (1991).Google Scholar
21. Yamaguchi, S. and Potember, R.S. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 267, 241 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Heintz, R.A. Zhao, H. Ouyang, X. Grandinetti, G. Cowen, J. Dunbar, K.R. Inorg. Chem. 38, 144 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Hefczyc, A. Beckmann, L. Becker, E. Johannes, H.-H. and Kowalsky, W. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 205, 647 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Sato, C. Wakamatsu, S. Tadokoro, K. and Ishii, K. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6535 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Hoagland, J.J. Wang, X.D. and Hipps, K.W. Chem. Mater. 5, 54 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Kever, T. Böttger, U., Schindler, C. and Waser, R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 083506 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Billen, J. Steudel, S. Müller, R., Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 263507 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Billen, J. Müller, R., Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. Proceed. 2nd Int. Conf. Mem. Technol. & Des., Giens (France) (2007) 135.Google Scholar
29. Müller, R., Naulaerts, R. Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. (unpublished).Google Scholar
30. Fan, Z.Y. Mo, X.L. Chen, G.R. and Lu, J.G. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 5, 72 (2003).Google Scholar
31. Kozicki, M.N. Mitkova, M. Park, M. Balakrishnan, M. and Gopalan, C. Superlat. & Microstruct. 34, 459 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Terabe, K. Hasegawa, T. Nakayama, T. and Aono, M. RIKEN Rev. 37, 7 (2001).Google Scholar
33. Ohachi, T. and Taniguchi, I. J. Cryst. Growth 13-14, 191 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Serebrennikova, I. and White, H.S. Electrochem. Sol.-State Lett. 4, B4 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Serebrennikova, I. Lee, S. and White, H.S. Far. Discuss. 121, 199 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Müller, R., Krebs, C. Goux, L. Wouters, D.J. Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. (unpublished).Google Scholar
37. Müller, R., Genoe, J. and Heremans, P. (unpublished)Google Scholar
38. Weitz, R.T. Walter, A. Engl, R. Sezi, R. and Dehm, C. Nano Lett. 6, 2810 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Aratani, K. Ohba, K. Mizuguchi, T. Yasuda, S. Shiimoto, T. Tsushima, T. Sone, T. Endo, K. Kouchiyama, A. Sasaki, S. Maesaka, A. Yamada, N. and Narisawa, H. Electron Device Meeting (IEDM), 783 (2007)Google Scholar
40. Kever, T. Klopstra, B. Böttger, U., and Waser, R. 7th Ann. Non-Volatile Mem. Technol. Symp., 119 (2006)Google Scholar