Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T15:44:52.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residual Oxygen Determination In Silicon Epilayer, Comparison With Ftir Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. Degas
Affiliation:
CNRS CERI Orléans 45071 cedex2 France
G. Blondiaux
Affiliation:
CNRS CERI Orléans 45071 cedex2 France
B. Pichaud
Affiliation:
MATOP faculteéde Saint Jérome avenue de l'escadrille de Normandie Niemen case 151 13397 Marseille cedex 20 France
Get access

Abstract

For power devices the use of silicon epilayer on CZ substrate is a solution to make devices with a low oxygen concentration in the active zone. Oxygen is probably one of the most important residual impurities in silicon samples. Usualy the determination of the interstitial oxygen is done by Fourier Transform Infra Red spectroscopy (FTIR). In this work we have determined oxygen by Charged Particle Activation Analysis (CPAA). The main difference between these two techniques is that CPAA gives the total oxygen concentration whereas FTIR gives interstitial oxygen.

We have determined the oxygen in 200μm thick silicon epilayer and studied its behavior during thermal treatments. Oxygen concentration is found in the range of 1015/cm3 just after the epitaxial process. After thermal treatment the concentration in the epilayer rose to several 1016/cm3 to 1017/cm3, depending on the treatment. A comparison with FTIR experiment is done and the amount of oxygen precipitate is determined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]: Shimura, F., “Behavior and Role of Oxygen in Silicon Wafers for VLSI” in “VLSI Science and Technology/1982Dell'Oca, C.J. and Bullis, W.M., Eds., p. 17 (1982)Google Scholar
[2]: Chiou, H.D., Solid State Technology (1977) pp. 7781 Google Scholar
[3]: Wijaranakula, W., J.Appl.Phys. 72, 7(1992) pp.27132723 Google Scholar
[4]: Needels, M., Joannopoulos, J.D., Y., Bar-Yam, Pantelides, S.T., Phys.Rev.B, Vol.43, n°5 (1991) pp. 4208–4215 Google Scholar
[5]: Devine, R.A.B., Mathiot, D., Warren, W.L. and Rohr, M.,, Microelectronic Engineering 28 (1995) pp. 341344 Google Scholar
[6]: Devine, R.A.B., Mathiot, D., Warren, W.L and Aspar, B., J.Appl.Phys., Vol.79, n°5 (1996) pp. 23022308 Google Scholar
[7]: Stingeder, G., Gara, S., Pahlke, S., Schwenk, H., Guerrero, E. and Grasserbauer, M., Fresenius Z Anal.Chem. 333 (1989) pp. 576582 Google Scholar
[8]: Pichaud, B., unpublished resultsGoogle Scholar
[9]: F, Degas, Thesis, University of Orléans (1997)Google Scholar
[10]: Bains, S.K., Griffiths, D.P., Wilkes, J.G., Series, R.W. and Barraclough, K.G., J.Electrochem.Soc., Vol.137, n°2 (1990) 647 Google Scholar