Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-jjt9s Total loading time: 0.265 Render date: 2021-06-21T10:30:18.628Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Reactions in Cemented Nuclear Waste forms – the Need for a Toolbox of Different Cement Types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Neil B Milestone
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Yun Bai
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Paulo R Borges
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Nick C Collier Jean-Phillipe Gorce
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Laura E Gordon
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Anthony Setiadi
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Claire A Utton
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Qizhi Zhou
Affiliation:
Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Engineering Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin St, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Get access

Abstract

Encapsulation of low and intermediate level waste (LLW and ILW) into a monolithic waste form is a key method for preparing such wastes for storage and ultimate disposal. One of the most efficient ways of doing this is by cementation, successfully used for much of today's operational waste in the UK. Formulations are based on composite cements where high levels ofpulverised fuel ash or blast furnace slag replace ordinary Portland cement (OPC). These provide cementing systems with good fluidity, lowered heat of hydration and a matrix with lower porosity and permeability. Further the alkaline hydrated calcium silicate matrix ensures insolubility of many metal hydroxides and hydrated oxides. Dealing with historic or legacy wastes presents a challenge as for many, a suitable cementing formulation has yet to be devised. To achieve ultimate durability, likely interactions between the waste and the cementing matrix need to be well understood when choosing the cement system to be used. The alkaline OPC based matrix causes corrosion with metals such as Al and Mg and porous silicates and layered metal hydroxides used to selectively remove radionucleides react in the alkaline environment, potentially releasing the adsorbed species. Slurries of materials normally considered inert show interactions within the OPC composite systems, although these are not considered detrimental for durability. This paper describes the chemistry of some interactions that occur within OPC composite cements. It also details some results for alternative cementing systems that may provide a toolbox of cement types that may address many of the interaction issues. These include calcium sulphoaluminate cements, inorganic polymers or geopolymers, and activated slag systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Utton, CA., Milestone, NB and Hill, J, Proc. Ann. Conf. Amer. Ceram. Soc. (2005)Google Scholar
2. Duff, MC, Coughlin, J Urbanik and Hunter, DB, Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 66, 35333547 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Collier, NC, Milestone, NB and Godfrey, IH, 24th Cem. and Concr. Sci. Conf. University of Warwick, UK, (2004)Google Scholar
4. Setiadi, A, Milestone, NB, and Hayes, M, 24th Cem. and Concr. Sci. Conf. University of Warwick, UK, (2004)Google Scholar
5. Gordon, LE and Milestone, NB, 24th Cem. and Concr. Sci. Conf. University of Warwick, UK, (2004)Google Scholar
6. Mumpton, F, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 34633470, (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gorce, JP and Milestone, NB, 24th Cem. and Concr. Sci. Conf. University of Warwick, UK, (2004)Google Scholar
8. Gartner, E, Cem. Concr. Res. 34 14891498 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Zhang, L. Su, M, and Wang, Y,. Adv. Cem. Res. 11 1521,(1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Gougar, MLD, Scheetz, BE, & Roy, DM, Waste Manag. 16 295303 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Zhou, Q, Milestone, NB and Hayes, M, in press J. Hazard. Mater Google Scholar
12. Glukhovsky, V. D, et al. , US Patent 4410365, (1983)Google Scholar
13. Qian, G, Sun, DD, Tay, JH, J. Hazard. Mater. 101 6577, (2003); Cem.Concr. Res. 33 1251-1256, (2003), Cem. Concr. Res. 33 1257-1262 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Bai, Y and Milestone, NB, Submitted to Nuclear Future.Google Scholar
15. British Standard BS 4248: 2004 – Super sulphated cementGoogle Scholar
16. Davidovits, J, Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, 131149, (1994); Concr. Internat., 16 53-58, (1994); US Patent 5 349 118 (1994).Google Scholar
17. Xu, H and Deventer, JSJ van Int. J. Min. Proc., 59 247266 (2000); JW Phair and JSJ van Deventer, Min. Eng., 14 289-304, (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Swanepoel, JC and Strydom, CA, Appl. Geochem., 17 1143–48, (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Jaarsfeld, JCS van, Deventer, JSJ van and Lorensen, L, Min. Eng., 10 659669 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Perera, DS, Vance, ER, Aly, Z, Finnie, KS, Hanna, JV, Nicholson, CL, Trautman, RL, Stewart, MWA, Proc ICEM '03 3 1807 1814 Google Scholar
21. Connelly, A and Milestone, NB, 24th Cem. Concr. Science Conf. University of Warwick, UK (2004)Google Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Reactions in Cemented Nuclear Waste forms – the Need for a Toolbox of Different Cement Types
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Reactions in Cemented Nuclear Waste forms – the Need for a Toolbox of Different Cement Types
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Reactions in Cemented Nuclear Waste forms – the Need for a Toolbox of Different Cement Types
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *