Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T01:03:14.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pressure-Sensitive Microvalves Made from Polymer Brushes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

E.M. Sevick  and
D.R.M. Williams
E.M. Sevick
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0424
D.R.M. Williams
Affiliation:
Institute of Advanced Studies, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, and Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California at Santa Barbara, CA, 93106 and Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109-1120
Get access

Abstract

We describe a novel microvalve, constructed from polymer chains end-grafted onto opposing surfaces of a narrow slit. The assembly of polymer chains acts as both sensor and valve for microflow control and bypasses the need to construct an external feedback mechanism. This microflow control results from densely grafted chains which repel one another and stretch away from the surface, forming a brush which acts as an elastic and impenetrable layer. The height of a sheared brush increases or decreases depending upon solvent quality, i.e the layer can show a negative Poission's ratio. The discharge through the brushlined conduit is a non-linear function of pressure enabling different modes of valve operation. For brushes which extend moderately into the inter-slit region the valve assembly maintains constant discharge over a wide range of pressure. For brushes which extend far into the inter-slit region the valve assembly cuts off flow above a critical pressure, limiting the maximum discharge.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 360 , 1994 , 329
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Halperin, A., Tirrell, M. and Lodge, T.P., Adv. Polymer. Sci. 100, 100 (1992).Google Scholar
[2]Milner, S.T., Science 905, 251, (1991).Google Scholar
[3]Klein, J., Perahia, D. and Warburg, S., Nature 352, 143 (1991).Google Scholar
[4]Klein, J.Pure Appl. Chem 64, 1577 (1992).Google Scholar
[5]Barrat, J.-L., Macromolecules 25, 832–834 (1992).Google Scholar
[6]Kumaran, V., Macromolecules 26, 2464 (1993).Google Scholar
[7]Sekimoto, K. and Leibler, L., Europhys. Lett. 23, 113 (1993). Note that this paper appears to contain an error which invalidates their central result: K. Sekimoto and Y. Rabin, Europhys. Lett. 27, 445 (1994)Google Scholar
[8]Sevick, E.M. and Williams, D.R.M., Macromolecules 27, 5285 (1994).Google Scholar
[9]Williams, D.R.M.,Macromolecules 26, 5806 (1993).Google Scholar
[10]Howell, J.A., Sanchez, V. and Field, R.W., Membranes in Biprocessing: Theory and Applications; (Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, 1993).Google Scholar
[11]Le, M.S. and Howell, J.A.Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 62, 373 (1984)Google Scholar
[12]Weldring, J.A.G. and Riet, K. van't, J. Membrane Sci 38, 127, (1988).Google Scholar
[13]Ko, M.K. and Pellegrino, J.J., J. Membrane Sci. 74, 141 (1992).Google Scholar
[14]Bosch, D., Heimhofer, B., Muck, G. and Seidel, H., Sensors and Actuators-A Physical 37, 684 (1993).Google Scholar
[15]Tirén, J., Tenerz, L. and Hök, B., Sensors and Actuators 18, 389 (1989).Google Scholar
[16]Emmer, A., Jansson, M., Roeraade, J., Lindberg, U. and Hök, B., J. Microcolumn Separations 4, 13 (1992).Google Scholar
[17]Esashi, M., Shoji, S. and Nakano, A., Sensors and Actuators 20, 163 (1989). (a) G.H. Fredrickson, A. Ajdari, L. Leibler and J.-P. Carton, Macromolecules 25, 282 (1992). (b) D.R.M. Williams, Macromolecules 26, 5096 (1993). (c) S.A. Safran and J. Klein, J. Phys. Paris 11 3, 794 (1993).Google Scholar
[19]Lakes, R.S., Advanced, R.S.Materials 5, 293 (1993).Google Scholar
[20]Auroy, P., Auvray, L., and Leger, L., Macromolecules 24, 2523, (1991).Google Scholar
[21]Halperin, A. and Zhulina, E.B., Europhys. Lett. 16, 337 (1991).Google Scholar
[22]Zhulina, E.B. and Halperin, A., Macromolecules 25, 5730 (1992).Google Scholar
[23]Halperin, A. and Zhulina, E.B., Prog. Colloid Polym. Sci. 90, 156, (1992).Google Scholar
[24]Halperin, A. and Williams, D.R.M., Macromolecules 26, 6652 (1993).Google Scholar
[25]Rabin, Y. and Alexander, S., Europhys. Lett. 13, 49 (1990).Google Scholar
[26]Gennes, P.G. de, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics; (Cornell Univeristy Press: Ithica, N.Y., 1979).Google Scholar
[27]Pincus, P.A., Macromolecules 9, 386 (1976).Google Scholar
[28]Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M., Fluid, E.M.Mechanics, (Pergamon Publishers, Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
[29] β1 is obtained as follows. In general the q versus p plot has a maxima and a minima. These are given by solutions of 0 = dq/dp which implies 0 = dq/dΔ = (dp/dΔ)(1 - βΔ) - 3βp. This equation only has two real roots for β > β1. For β < β1 there are no real roots and the q(p) relation is monotonic.+β1.+For+β+<+β1+there+are+no+real+roots+and+the+q(p)+relation+is+monotonic.>Google Scholar
[30]Yamagishi, H., Saito, K., Furusaki, S., Sugo, T., Hosoi, F. and Okamoto, J., J. Membrane Sci. 85, 71 (1993).Google Scholar
[31]Webber, R.M., Anderson, J.L., and Myung, S.J., Macromolecules 23, 1026 (1990).Google Scholar
[32]Brochard-Wyart, F., Europhys. Lett. 23, 105 (1993).Google Scholar