Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-lm8cj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-10T11:54:26.268Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Modeling and Simulation of n-Type Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistors Using Ca as Contact Electrodes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Aurangzeb Khan
Affiliation:, University of South Alabama, Electrical Engineering, 307 university Blvd, ECEB51, Mobile, AL 36688, Mobile, AL, 36688, United States, 2514606923
A. Q.S Shah
Affiliation:, University of south Alabama, ECE, 307 university Blvd., Mobile, AL, 36688, United States
Jihua Gou
Affiliation:, University of South Alabama, Mechanical Engineering, 307 University Blvd., Mobile, AL, 36688, United States
Get access


In this research work, a model has been proposed in view of the recent experimental demonstration using Calcium (Ca) as a contact metal to realize the n-type carbon nanotube field effect transistors (CNTFET). In order to fully optimize this proposed device model, effects of different parameters like the work function, oxide thickness, the oxide capacitance and the source velocity limits were studied. Among all the parameters, the work function of the contact metal plays an important role for controlling the flow of carriers through the carbon nanotube channel and to reduce the threshold voltage. A semi-classical simulation of the proposed n-type CNTFET has been performed. Results show an excellent subthreshold swing value of 62.91 mV/decade, close to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor (ITRS) specifications.

Research Article
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1. Horiuchi, K., Kato, T., Hashii, S., Hashimoto, A., Sasaki, T., Aoki, N., Ochiai, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 2005, 86, 153108.Google Scholar
2. Pourfath, M., Ungersböck, E., Gehring, A., Cheong, B.-H., Park, W., Kosina, H., Selberherr, S., proceeding of the 34th European Solid-State Device Research Conference,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2004, 429.Google Scholar
3. Martel, R., Derycke, V., Lavoie, C., Appenzeller, J., Chan, K., Tersoff, J. and Avouris, P., “Ambipolar electrical transport in semiconducting single-wall carbon nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 87, no. 25, pp. 256807, 2001.Google Scholar
4. Appenzeller, J., Knoch, J., Derycke, V., Martel, R., Wind, S., and Avouris, P., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 89, 126801.Google Scholar
5. Ren, Z., Ph. D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Dec. 2001.Google Scholar
6. Gou, J. and Lundstrom, M., IEEE Trans. On Electron Devices, vol. 49, issue 11, pp. 18971902, 2002.Google Scholar
7. Nosho, Y., Ohno, Y., Kishimoto, S., and Mizutani, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 86, pp. 073105, Feb. 2005.Google Scholar
8. Ishii, H., Sugiyama, , Ito, E. and Seki, K. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.), vol. 11, pp. 605, 1999.Google Scholar
9. Javey, A., Gou, J., Farmer, D. B., Wang, Q., Wang, D., Gordon, R. G., Lundstom, M., and Dai, H., Nano letter, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 447450, 2004.Google Scholar
10.FETToy2.0 tool information,,” 10/03/2005.Google Scholar
11. Natori, K., J. Applied Phys., vol. 76, no. 8, 15 Oct., 1994.Google Scholar
12.International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor, 2001 Edition, Semiconductor Industry Association, “,” 10/03/2005.Google Scholar
13. Javey, A., Gou, J., Wang, Q., Lundstrom, M., Dai, H., Nature, 2003, 424, 654.Google Scholar