Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-58z7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-02T10:14:38.116Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Effects of salt concentrations on the structural transitions of peptide-amphiphile solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2014

Takahiro Otsuka
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan
Atsushi Hotta
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan
Get access


A new peptide amphiphile (PA) called C16-W3K has hierarchical structures, presenting unique solution states, micelle structures, and secondary structures. In this work, the effects of salt (sodium dihydrogenorthophosphate) concentration on the hierarchical structural transitions of the C16-W3K solution due to its active hydrogen bonding in the peptide were discussed. In order to analyze the effects of salt on the structural transitions, the mechanical and structural analyses were conducted by viscosity measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and circular dichroic (CD) spectroscopy. It was found that the C16-W3K solutions with different salt concentrations presented different multi-scale structural transitions from spherical micelles with α-helix molecular conformations in the sol state to wormlike micelles with β-sheet conformations in the gel state. Additionally, we found that the speed of transition increased as the salt concentration increased and the conformational ratio of β-sheet to α-helix in the solutions increased with the increase in the salt concentration.

Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Luo, Z and Zhang, S, Chemical Society Reviews, 41(13), 47364754 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manasa Nune PK, , Krishnan, Uma Maheswari and Sethuraman, Swaminathan, Current Protein and Peptide Science, 14(1), 7084 (2013).Google Scholar
Ghosh, A, Haverick, M, Stump, K, Yang, X, Tweedle, MF, and Goldberger, JE, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134(8), 36473650 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X-D, Jin, Y, Liu, Y, Zhang, X-Z, and Zhuo, R-X, Colloids and Surfaces B, Biointerfaces, 81(1), 329335 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelletto, V, Hamley, IW, Cenker, C, and Olsson, U, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 114(23), 80028008 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, JS, Zhang, GP, Holt, PD, Jung, H-T, Carrano, CJ, Haygood, MG, and Butler, A, Science, 287(5456), 12451247 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Zou, A-H, Ye, R-Q, and Mu, B-Z, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113(46), 1527215277 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagdas, YS, Tombuloglu, A, Tekinay, AB, Dana, A, and Guler, MO, Soft Matter, 7(7), 35243532 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoorchian, A, Cole, JT, and Holland, NB, Macromolecules, 43(9), 43404345 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, T, Lee, S, Bates, FS, Hotta, A, and Tirrell, M, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113(42), 1371113714 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, T, Megley, K, Tirrell, M, and Hotta, A. Soft Matter, 7(19), 88568861 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar