Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-4htn5 Total loading time: 0.279 Render date: 2021-06-20T06:28:23.518Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Effect of Crystallochemistry of Starting Materials on the Rate of Smectite to Illite Reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Tsutomu Sato
Affiliation:
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki 319–11, Japan
Takashi Murakami
Affiliation:
Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790, Japan
Hiroshi Isobe
Affiliation:
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki 319–11, Japan
Toshihiko Ohnuki
Affiliation:
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Ibaraki 319–11, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A series of hydrothermal experiments was performed to determine the effect of layer charge of starting materials on the smectite to illite reaction rate that might be applied to nuclear-waste repository design. The experiments were conducted on K-saturated <2μm fractions of Wyoming smectite (SWy-1) and Tsukinuno smectite (SKu-F, commercially, Kunipia-F) in a closed system at temperatures of 95, 150, 200, 250, 300°C for run durations of up to 477 days with a 1:20 mass ratio of solid to deionized water. The mean layer charge and tetrahedral charge of SKu-F are larger than those of SWy-1. The proportion of smectite layers in illite/smectite interstratified minerals rapidly decreases, and then slowly decreases with increase in reaction time; a plot of In (100/% smectite) vs. time produces two distinct straight lines in all experiments. These lines are suggestive of two first-order kinetic processes with different rates for this reaction; the first process has a greater rate than the second one. An Arrhenius plot of the reaction rates for each process produces a folding and straight lines for the first and second processes, respectively, suggesting that there are at least two parallel processes in the first process, and a dominant process is different between high- and low-temperature reactions. The activation energies of the first and second processes determined from the plots are the same for the two starting materials, meaning that the reaction mechanisms for the two starting materials are the same. However, the rate of the first process is different between the two starting materials, although that of the second process is similar. The difference in the rate of the first process results possibly from the difference in the amount of layer charge between the two starting smectites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Burst, J. F., Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 53, 73 (1969).Google Scholar
2. Bruce, C. H., AAPG Bulletin 68, 637 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Boles, J. R. and Franks, S. G., J.Sed. Petrology 49, 55 (1979).Google Scholar
4. Inoue, A., Utada, M. and Wakita, K., Applied Clay Science 7, 131 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eberl, D. D. and Hower, J., Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 87, 1326 (1976).2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Roberson, H. E. and Lahann, R. W., Clays and Clay Miner. 29, 129 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Howard, J. J. and Roy, D. M., Clays and Clay Miner. 33, 81 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Huang, W. L., Longo, J. M. and Pevear, D. R., Clays Clay Miner. 41, 162 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bethke, C. M. and Altaner, S. P., Clays and Clay Miner. 34, 136 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pytte, A. M. and Reynolds, R. C., in The thermal transformation of smectite to illite, edited by Naeser, N. D. and McCulloh, T. H. (Springer, New York, 1989) p. 133.Google Scholar
11. Velde, B. and Vasseur, G., Am. Miner. 77, 967 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Inoue, A., J. Clay Sci. Soc. Jpn. 31, 14 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Eberl, D., Whitney, G. and Khoury, H., Am. Miner. 63, 401 (1978).Google Scholar
14. Giiven, N. and Huang, W. L., Clays Clay Miner. 39, 387 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Laird, D. A., Scott, A. D. and Fenton, T. E., Clays & Clay Miner. 37, 41 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Watanabe, T., Sci. Repts. Dep. Geol. Kyushu Univ. 13, 225 (1977).Google Scholar
17. Whitney, G. and Northrop, R., Am. Miner. 73, 77 (1988).Google Scholar
18. Whitney, G., Clays & Clay Miner. 38, 343 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Whitney, G., Applied Clay Science 7, 97 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effect of Crystallochemistry of Starting Materials on the Rate of Smectite to Illite Reaction
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Effect of Crystallochemistry of Starting Materials on the Rate of Smectite to Illite Reaction
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Effect of Crystallochemistry of Starting Materials on the Rate of Smectite to Illite Reaction
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *