Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T11:24:01.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deep levels of antisite defects clusters in ZnGeP2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Valeriy G. Voevodin
Affiliation:
Siberian Physico-Technical Institute 1 Revolution sq., 634050, Tomsk, Russia
Sergey N. Grinyaev
Affiliation:
Siberian Physico-Technical Institute 1 Revolution sq., 634050, Tomsk, Russia
Get access

Abstract

On the basis of the methods of pseudopotential and large unit cell the research of deep lev- els of point and cluster defects in ZnGeP2 (ZGP) was carried out. It was shown that owing to lowering of the crystal lattice symmetry localised states of point defects in the ternary compound essentially differ from such states in its binary analogue GaP. Small quasicubic antisite defects clusters reduce the value of band gap, but render weak influence on the probability of optical transitions. But both single and the cluster antisite defects cause large modifications in deep levels of another point defects closed to them. On an example of phosphorus vacancy it was shown that intensive optical transitions with small energies can appear and cause an absorption in near IR – range because of antisite defects effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Zapol, P., Pandey, R., Ohmer, M., Gale, J., J.Apll.Phys. 79, 671 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Shay, J.L. and Wernick, J.H., Ternary Chalcopyrite Semiconductors: Growth, Electronic Properties and Application (Pergamon, Oxford, 1974).Google Scholar
3. Shimony, Y., Kimmel, G., Raz, O., Dariel, M.P., Journ.Cryst.Growth. 198/199, 583(1999).Google Scholar
4. Grinyaev, S.N., Chaldyshev, V.A., Semiconductors, 35, 86 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Bellaiche, L., Wei, S.-H., Zunger, A., Phys.Rev. B54, 17568 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Schwartz, G., Kley, A., Neugebauer, J., Scheffler, M., Phys.Rev. B58, 1392 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Brudnyi, V.N., Grinyaev, S.N., Stepanov, V.E., Physica B212, 429 (1995).Google Scholar