Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T21:47:01.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterizing the effect of uniaxial strain on the surface roughness of Si nanowire MEMS-based microstructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2011

E. Escobedo-Cousin
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
S.H. Olsen
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
T. Pardoen
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
U. Bhaskar
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
J.-P. Raskin
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

This work addresses the paucity of roughness measurements by reporting on roughness parameters in uniaxial strained Si beams relevant for state of the art MOSFETs, nanowire and MEMS devices, with varying degrees of strain. Roughness is characterized by high resolution AFM and strain is characterized by Raman spectroscopy. Microstructures comprising a silicon nitride actuator are used to induce a wide range of stress levels in Si beams. The microstructures also allow the comparison of surface evolution in the strain direction (along the Si beam) compared with the unstrained direction (across the Si beam). A gradual reduction in rms roughness amplitude and increase in roughness correlation length in the direction of the applied stress are found for increasing values of strain. In contrast, surface roughness in the direction perpendicular to the applied stress remained largely unchanged from the unstrained initial state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bonno, O., Barraud, S., Mariolle, D. and Andrieu, F., Journal of Applied Physics 103(6), 063715063719 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Zhao, Y., Takenaka, M. and Takagi, S., Electron Device Letters, IEEE 30(9), 987989 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Boé, A., Safi, A., Coulombier, M., Fabregue, D., Pardoen, T. and Raskin, J.-P., Smart Materials and Structures 18(11), 115018 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. André, N., Coulombier, M., De Longueville, V., Fabrègue, D., Gets, T., Gravier, S., Pardoen, T. and Raskin, J.-P., Microelectronics Engineering 84(11), 27142718 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gravier, S., Coulombier, M., Safi, A., André, N., Boé, A., Raskin, J.-P. and Pardoen, T., Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 18(3), 555569 (2009).Google Scholar
6. Goodnick, S. M., Ferry, D. K., Wilmsen, C. W., Liliental, Z., Fathy, D. and Krivanek, O. L., Physical Review B 32(12), 8171 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar