Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-s2vjv Total loading time: 0.43 Render date: 2023-01-28T21:09:18.276Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Backfill Modification Using Geochemical Principles to Optimize High Level Nuclear Waste Isolation in a Geological Repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Donald Langmuir
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry & Geochemistry, Colorado School of Mines, Golden CO 80401
Michael J. Apted
Affiliation:
Intera Sciences, Inc., 3609 S. Wadsworth Blvd., #550, Denver CO 80235
Get access

Abstract

The clay backfill that will surround a buried high level nuclear waste package in most national repository programs, could be modified to play a greater role as a barrier to radionuclide (RN) releases. The RN steady state release (Mb) rate from a clay backfill to adjacent rock is directly proportional to backfill porosity (ε), RN diffusion rate In the backfill (Ds), and RN solubility at the waste form surface (C*), and Inversely proportional to RN half-life (λ) and RN retardation coefficient (R) in the backfill [1]. We propose ways to reduce ε, Ds and C* and Increase R for important radionuclides, mostly through the addition of reactive minerals to the backfill. Silica, calcite and anhydrite may be added to precipitate and clog porosity. Increased backfill compaction similarly reducesε, Ds and Mb for all the RN's. Strongly sorbent phases can be added to selectively adsorb both cationic and anionic RN's (e.g. 1–129). However, adsorption will not Importantly reduce peak release rates of most long-lived RN's. The backfill can be poised at reducing Eh's with mineral additives to lower Ds and so immobilize radioisotopes of NI, Np, Pa, Pu, Se, Tc and U. Minerals of stable or more stable isotopes of Cs, NI, Se, Sn and U can be added to lower Ds values of the RN's and to coprecipitate them in solid solution. Phosphorite-apatites, which are known to have high selectivities for rare earths and RN's, may be added to coprecipitate Am, Np, Pu, Sr, Th and U.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chambré, P.L, written communication, (Univ. of California, Berkeley CA, 1991).Google Scholar
2. Langmulr, D., In Coupled Processes Associated with Nuclear Waste Repositories, edited by Tsang, C-F. (Academic Press, Inc. 1987) pp. 167–101.Google Scholar
3. Apted, M.J., In Fourth Natural Analogue Working Group Meeting and Pocos de Caldas Prolect Final Workshop, Final Meeting Report, edited by Come, B. and Chapman, N.A. (CEC Report ri EUR 13014 EN, 1992), In press.Google Scholar
4. Albinsson, Y., Forsyth, R., Skarnemark, G., Skblberg, M., Torstenfelt, B. and Werme, L in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 176, edited by Oversby, V.M. and Brown, P.W. (Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburg, PA, 1990) pp. 559565.Google Scholar
5. Bruno, J. and Carroll, S.A., Abs. No.2BP-4 In 2nd Intl. Conf. on Chemistry and Migration Behavior of Actinides and Fission Products In the Geosphere, Monterey Conf. Center, Monterey, CA. Co-sponsored by CEC, Brussels, Belgium and U.S. DOE, Washington D.C. p. 78.Google Scholar
6. Liu, W.-C. and Tsal, C.-M., in Chemistry and Miairation Behavior of ActInIdes and Fission Products In the Geosohere, Second Intl. Conf., Monterey Conf. Center, Monterey CA, Nov. 6-10, 1989, Abs. 2B-4 (Co-Sponsored by CEC, Brussels, Belgium and U.S. DOE, Washington, D.C., 1989) p. 135.Google Scholar
7. Langmuir, D. and Riese, A.C., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 49,1593 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gauglitz, R., Holterdorf, M., Franke, W. and Marx, G., Poster A.IX.P1 In EMRS 1991 Fall Meetinq, Strasbourg, France, Nov. 4-8, 1991.Google Scholar
9. Kim, K.H., Lee, S.Y. and Ammons, J.T. In Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, edited by Abrajano, T. Jr., and Johnson, L H. (Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburg, PA, 1991) pp. 633640.Google Scholar
10. Andersson, K., Kjellbert, N.A. and Forsberg, B., Radionuclide Migration Calculations with Respect to the KBS-3-Concept, Tech. Rept. SKI 84:1 (Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, Sweden, 1984), 51 pp.Google Scholar
11. Nuclear Waste Management in Switzerland: Feasibility Studies and Safety Analyses, Project Report NGB 85-09, Nagra, Baden/Switzerland.Google Scholar
12. Moore, D.E., Morrow, C.A. and Byerlee, J.D., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 47, 445 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Glassley, W.E., In Hydrologic Properties of the Waste Package Environment, Study Plan for WBS Element 1.2.2.2.L, SCP Section 8.3.4.2.4.2, (Lawrence Livermore Nati. Laboratory, for U.S. Dept. of Energy, OCRWM, July 22, 1988), p. 11.Google Scholar
14. Pusch, R., Borgesson, L and Erisrom, M., Alteration of Isolation Properties of Dense Smectite Clay In Repository Environment at Exemplified by Seven Pre-Quaternary Clays, SKB Tech. Rept. 88–29 (Stockholm, Sweden, 1987).Google Scholar
15. Langmulr, D. and Melchior, D., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 49, 2423 (1985).Google Scholar
16. Nordstrom, D.K., Plummer, L.N., Langmulr, D., Busenberg, E., May, H.M., Jones, B.F. and Parkhurst, D.L., In Chemical Modeling of Aqueous Systems II, edited by Melchior, D.C. and Bassett, R.L. (ACS Symp. Ser. 416, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C., 1990) pp. 398413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Conca, J.L., Ashida, T. and Sato, H., in High Level Radioactive Waste Mana-gement, Vol. 2, Proc. 2nd Annual Intl. Conf., Las Vegas NV, Apr. 28-May 3, 1991 (Am. Nuclear Soc., Inc., La Grange Park IL, 1991) p. 1382.Google Scholar
18. McKinley, I.G., The Geochemistry of the Near-Field, EIR-Bericht Nr. 563, (Swiss Federal Inst. for Reactor Research, CH-5303 Wurenlingen, Oct. 1985).Google Scholar
19. Mumpton, F.A., in Mineralogy and Geology of Natural Zeolites, edited by Mumpton, F.A., (Reviews In Mineralogy 4 (Min. Soc. Am., Washington D.C., 1981), p. 177204.Google Scholar
20. Langmuir, D., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 42, 547 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Gu, B. and Schulz, R.K., Anion Retention in Soil: Possible Application to Reduce Miaration of Buried Technetium and Iodine, A Review,(NUREG/CR-5464, U.S. Nuclear Reg. Commission, 1991) 32 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Vilks, P. and Degueldre, C., Applied Geochem. 6(5), 553 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. R.M. Smith and Martell, A.E., Critical Stability Constants, (Plenum Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
24. Wickberg, P., In Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R. W. (Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburg, PA, 1988) p. 373.Google Scholar
25. Gascoyne, M., Ross, J.D. and Watson, R.L., in Proc. Fourth Canadian/American Conf. on Hydrogeol, Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer and Mass Transport in Fractured Rocks, Banff, Aib. Canada, Jun 21-24, 1988, edited by Hitchon, B. and Bachu, S. (Nati. Water Well Assoc., Dublin OH, USA, 1988) pp. 2031.Google Scholar
26. Langmuir, D., In Procedures in Sedimentary Petrology, edited by Carver, R. E. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971) pp. 597634.Google Scholar
27. SKB Tech. Rept. 89-40, Stockholm, Sweden, May 1989, p. 81.Google Scholar
28. Bennington, K.O., Beyer, R.P. and Johnson, G.K., Thermodynamic Properties of Pollucite (a Cesium-Aluminum-Silicate, Bu. Mines Rept. of Investigations RI-8779 (U.S. Dept. Interior, 1983) 18 pp.Google Scholar
29. Palache, C., Berman, H. and Frondel, C., The System of Mineralogy 7th ed., Vol. I and II. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1952) 834 and 1124 pp.Google Scholar
30. Lemire, R.J. and Garisto, F., The Solubility of U. Np, Pu, Th and Tc in a Geological Diposal Vault for Used Nuclear Fuel, Report AECL-1 0009 (Whiteshell Nucl. Res. EsI., Pinawa Manitoba ROE 1 LO, 1989) 70 pp.Google Scholar
31. Wright, J., Schrader, H. and Holser, W.T., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 51, 631 (1987).Google Scholar
32. Altschuler, Z.S., Clarke, R.S. Jr., and Young, E.J., Geochemistry of Uranium in Apatite and Phosphorite, Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 314-D (U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1958) 87 pp.Google Scholar
33. Shamsuddln, M. and Wadsworth, M.E., Uranium-Phosphorus Chemistry and Extraction of Uranium from Uraniferous Phosphorites U.S. Bur. Mines Open File Rept. 99-80 (Nati. Tech. Info. Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfield VA, 1980) 80 pp.Google Scholar
34. Koeppenkastrop, D. and Carlo, E.H. De, Earth and Planetary Sci. Letters Submitted, (1990).Google Scholar
35. Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A. and Zussman, J., An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966) 528 pp.Google Scholar
36. Cappellen, P. Van and Berner, R.A., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 55, 1219 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Jahnke, R.A., Emerson, S.R., Roe, K.K. and Burnett, W.C., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 47, 259 (1983).Google Scholar
38. Eanes, E.D., in Biologlcal Mineralization, edited by Zipkin, I., (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973) pp. 227256.Google Scholar
39. Burt, D.M., In Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Rare Earth Elements, Reviews in Mineralogy 21, edited by Lipin, B.R. and McKay, G.A., (Min. Soc. Am., Washington, D.C., 1989) pp. 259307.Google Scholar
40. Whittacker, E.J.W. and Muntus, R., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 34 945 (1970).Google Scholar
41. Nrlagu, J.O., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 38 887 (1974).Google Scholar
42. Rai, D., Unpublished Report, Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland WA.Google Scholar
43. Shannon, R.D., Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 32 751 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Lipin, B.R. and McKay, G.A., editors, Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Rare Earth Elements. Review In Mineralogy 21 (Min. Soc. Am., Washington, D.C., 1989) 348 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. McKay, G.A., In Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Rare Earth Elements, Reviews in Mineralogy 21, edited by Lipin, B.R. and McKay, G.A., (Min. Soc. Am., Washington D.C., 1989) pp. 4577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Baar, H.J.W. De, Brewer, P.G. and Bacon, P.M., Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 49 1943 (1985).Google Scholar
47. Altschuler, Z.S., Marine Phosphorites, edited by Bentor, Y.K., SEPM Special Publ. 29 (SEPM, Tulsa OK, 1980), pp. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Grenthe, I., Fuger, J., Lemire, R.J., Muller, A.B., Nguyen-Trung, C. and Wanner, H., Chemical Thermodynamics of Uranium (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992, In press).Google Scholar
49. Uraniferous Phosphate Resources and Technoloay and Economics of Uranium Recovery from Phosphate Resources United States and the Free World, (U.S. Dept. of Energy Rept. GJBX-1 10(79), 1979).Google Scholar
50. Eyal, Y. and Olander, D.R., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 127, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (MRS, Pittsburg, PA, 1989), pp. 269276.Google Scholar
51. Snellman, M., Uotila, H. and Rantanen, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 84, edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W. B., (MRS, Pittsburg, PA, 1987) pp. 781790.Google Scholar
52. Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A., Groundwater, (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1979), 604 pp.Google Scholar
53. Natural Analogues in Performance Assesments for the Disposal of Long Lived Radioactive Wastes. Tech Rept. Ser. 304, (Intl. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1989), 57 pp.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Backfill Modification Using Geochemical Principles to Optimize High Level Nuclear Waste Isolation in a Geological Repository
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Backfill Modification Using Geochemical Principles to Optimize High Level Nuclear Waste Isolation in a Geological Repository
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Backfill Modification Using Geochemical Principles to Optimize High Level Nuclear Waste Isolation in a Geological Repository
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *