Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:53:59.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amorphous/Crystalline Structure And Phase Transformations In Metastable Semiconducting Ge1−xSnx

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Susanne M. Lee
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., Livermore, CA 94550 and, Lawrence University, Dept. of Physics, P. O.Box 599, Appleton, WI 54912
Katayun Barmak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, 5 East Packer Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18015.
Get access

Abstract

The semiconducting crystalline alloys, Ge1−xSnx, are of interest due to theoretical predictions about their electronic band structures which make them useful in infrared photodetectors. However the composition region where these alloys have the desired properties is greater than the equilibrium solid solubility limit of Sn in Ge (x<0.01). We have circumvented the solubility limits and produced thin (2000Å) and thick (4–8Μm) films of Gei.xSnx (x<0.31) by rf sputtering. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) Measurements were performed to study grain growth and crystallization processes in these highly metastable semiconductors. X-ray and electron diffraction measurements indicated the materials were amorphous, but the fact that some of the films were fine grained polycrystalline samples only became apparent in their DSC spectra. We present models that describe quantitatively the transformation behavior in both sets of films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Lee, S.M., J. Appl. Phys., publication date:l Feb 1994.Google Scholar
2 Chen, L. C and Spaepen, F., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 679 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Atkinson, H.V., Acta Metall. 36, 469 (1988).Google Scholar
4 Eyring, H., J.Chem.Phys. 3, 107 (1935).Google Scholar
5 Wert, C. A., Phys. Rev. 79, 601 (1950).Google Scholar
6 Ridgway, M. C, Elliman, R. G., Thornton, R. P., Williams, J. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1992 (1990);Google Scholar
Smith, D. A., Tu, K. N., Wiess, B. Z., Ultramicroscopy 30, 90 (1989);Google Scholar
Hewett, C. A., Suni, I., Lau, S. S., Hung, L. S., and Scott, D. M., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 27, 145 (1984). 7 Chen and Spaepen, op. cit., 679.Google Scholar
8 Murr, L. E., Interfacial Phenomena in metals and Alloys. (Addison-Wesley, London, 1975).Google Scholar
9 Burke, J. E. and Turnbull, D., Prog. Metal Phys. 3, 220 (1952);Google Scholar
Wagner, C, Elektrochem, Z.. 65, 581 (1961);Google Scholar
Thompson, C. V., Frost, H. J., and Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. 35, 887 (1987).Google Scholar