Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:21:01.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3D Process Integration – Wafer-to-Wafer and Chip-to-Wafer Bonding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Thorsten Matthias ,
Markus Wimplinger ,
Stefan Pargfrieder  and
Paul Lindner
Thorsten Matthias
Affiliation:
t.matthias@evgroup.com, EV Group, Technology, 7700 S River Parkway, Tempe, AZ, 85284, United States
Markus Wimplinger
Affiliation:
m.wimplinger@evgroup.com, EV Group, DI Erich Thallner Strasse 1, St. Florian/Inn, 4782, Austria
Stefan Pargfrieder
Affiliation:
s.pargfrieder@evgroup.com, EV Group, DI Erich Thallner Strasse 1, St. Florian/Inn, 4782, Austria
Paul Lindner
Affiliation:
p.lindner@evgroup.com, EV Group, DI Erich Thallner Strasse 1, St. Florian/Inn, 4782, Austria
Get access

Abstract

Many feasibility and design studies during the last years have shown that devices based on 3D chip stacking and integration can significantly outperform traditional planar (2D) devices. Furthermore, as packaging of the devices is a major cost factor, the possibility to integrate multiple functional entities in one package offers a huge potential for cost reduction. On research level the technical feasibility has been proven for a variety of processes. Today's focus lies on innovative manufacturing technologies and process integration schemes, which meet both, the economic and the technical demands.

Stacking of individual chips (both chip-to-wafer and wafer-to-wafer) has the inherent advantage that different functional subsystems like logic and memory can be processed on separate wafers thereby reducing the complexity and the number of process steps greatly. The individual chips can be processed on heterogeneous materials, in different fabs and by different producers.

Wafer-level integration has the advantage of higher throughput, enhanced cleanliness and the flexibility that standard fab equipment can be used for further processing. 3D integration applying chip-to-wafer bonding focuses on the yield (“good known die”) and enables to stack dies of different size e.g. several small dies on one big base die. This allows e.g. the integration of a logic device from a 300mm Si wafer with RF devices from a 150mm GaAs wafer.

In this paper a higher emphasis lies on the key enabling manufacturing technologies and supported processes.

Keywords

semiconductingbondingmicroelectro-mechanical (MEMS)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 970: Symposium Y – Enabling Technologies for 3-D Integration , 2006 , 0970-Y04-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hübner, Holger, et al., “Face-to-face chip integration with full metal interface”, Advanced Metallization Conference, San Diego, 2002.Google Scholar
2. Puligadda, R. at.al., “High Performance Temporary Adhesives for Wafer Bonding Applications”, MRS Fall 2006, Symposium Y, Boston 2006 Google Scholar
3. Matthias, T. et.al., “Trends in aligned wafer bonding for MEMS and IC wafer-level packaging and 3D interconnect technologies”, Proc. of IWLPC 2004, San Jose 2004 Google Scholar
4. Matthias, T. et. al., “SiP and 3-D Interconnects”, Advanced Packaging Magazine Aug./Sept. 2006, p32–37 Google Scholar
5. Kernevez, N., “Ultra-thin chip stacking for 3D interconnect”, Proc. 3D Architectures for Semiconductor Integration and Packaging 2006, Burlingame 2006 Google Scholar
6. Niklaus, F. et al., “Fine Keyed Alignment and Bonding for Wafer-Level 3D ICs”, MRS Symposium Proc. 0914-F10-05Google Scholar
7. Reif, R., Tan, C. S., Fan, A., Chen, K.-N., Das, S., Checka, N., “3-D Interconnects using Cu Wafer Bonding: Technology and Applications”, Advanced Metallization Conference, San Diego, Oct. 1–3, 2002 Google Scholar
8. Chen, K. N., Tan, C. S., Fan, A. and Reif, R., “Morphology and bond strength of copper wafer bonding”, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 7 (1), pp G14–G16, 2004.Google Scholar
9. Morrow, P., Kobrinsky, M., Ramanathan, S., Park, C., Harmes, M., Ramachandrarao, V., Park, H., Kloster, G., List, S., Kim, S., proceedings of Advanced Metallization Conference 2004 Google Scholar
10. Kwon, Y., Lu, J-Q., Gutmann, R.J., Kraft, P.P., McDonald, J.F. and Cale, T.S., “Wafer bonding Using Low-K Dielectrics as Bonding Glue in Three-Dimensional Integration”, The Electrochemical Society, 2001 Joint Meeting, San Francisco, Ca, September 2–7, 2001 Google Scholar
11. Kwon, Y., Yu, J., McMahon, J.J., Lu, J.-Q., Cale, T.S., Gutmann, R.J., “Evaluation of Thin Dielectric-Glue Wafer-Bonding for Three Dimensional Integrated Circuit-Applications”, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 812, F6.16.1Google Scholar
12. Niklaus, Frank, “Adhesive wafer bonding for microelectronic and microelectromechanical systems”, PhD Thesis, Stockholm, 2002 Google Scholar
13. Pozder, S., Lu, J.-Q., Kwon, Y., Zollner, S., Yu, J., McMahon, J.J.,Cale, T.S., Yu, K., and Gutmann, R.J., “Back-End Compatibility of Bonding and Thinning Processes for a Wafer-Level 3D Interconnect Technology Platform”, IITC 2004 Google Scholar
14. Lu, J.-Q., Cale, T.S., Gutmann, R.J., “Dielectric adhesive wafer bonding for back-end wafer-level 3D hyper-integration”, ECS Meeting, Honolulu, Oct. 3–8, 2004 Google Scholar
15. Dragoi, Viorel et al., “Low temperature MEMS manufacturing processes: plasma activated wafer bonding”, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 872 (2005), J7.1.1 Google Scholar