Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:26:06.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuronal dynamics on patterned substrates measured by fluorescence microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

Joao Marcos Vensi Basso ,
Marc Simon  and
Cristian Staii
Joao Marcos Vensi Basso
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, 574 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Marc Simon
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, 574 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Cristian Staii*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, 574 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Cristian Staii at cstaii01@tufts.edu
Get access

Abstract

Geometrical features are known to be very important in neuronal growth and the formation of neuronal networks. We present an experimental and theoretical investigation of axonal growth and dynamics for neurons cultured on patterned polydimethylsiloxane surfaces. We utilize fluorescence microscopy to image the axonal dynamics and show that these substrates impart a strong directional bias to neuronal growth. We model axonal dynamics using a general stochastic model and use this framework to extract key dynamical parameters. These results provide novel insight into how geometrical cues influence neuronal growth and represent important advances toward bioengineering neuronal growth platforms.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 487 - 492
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wen, Z. and Zheng, J.Q.: Directional guidance of nerve growth cones. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 52–58 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lowery, L.A. and van Vactor, D.: The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 332–343 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Spedden, E., White, J.D., Naumova, E.N., Kaplan, D.L., and Staii, C.: Elasticity maps of living neurons measured by combined fluorescence and atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 103, 868–877 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Clark, P., Britland, S., and Connolly, P.: Growth cone guidance and neuron morphology on micropatterned laminin surfaces. J. Cell Sci. 105, 203–212 (1993).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Staii, C., Viesselmann, C., Ballweg, J., Shi, L., Liu, G-Y., Williams, J.C., Dent, E.W., Coppersmith, S.N., and Eriksson, M.A.: Positioning and guidance of neurons on gold surfaces by directed assembly of proteins using atomic force microscopy. Biomaterials 30, 3397–3404 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Staii, C., Viesselmann, C., Ballweg, J., Williams, J.C., Dent, E.W., Coppersmith, S.N., and Eriksson, M.A.: Distance dependence of neuronal growth on nanopatterned gold surfaces. Langmuir 27, 233–239 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Rosoff, W.J., Urbach, J.S., Esrick, M.A., McAllister, R.G., Richards, L.J., and Goodhill, G.J.: A new chemotaxis assay shows the extreme sensitivity of axons to molecular gradients. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 678–682 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Francisco, H., Yellen, B.B., Halverson, D.S., Friedman, G., and Gallo, G.: Regulation of axon guidance and extension by three-dimensional constraints. Biomaterials 28, 3398–3407 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Beighley, R., Spedden, E., Sekeroglu, K., Atherton, T., Demirel, M.C., and Staii, C.: Neuronal alignment on asymmetric textured surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 143701 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Spedden, E., Wiens, M.R., Demirel, M.C., and Staii, C.: Effects of surface asymmetry on neuronal growth. PLoS ONE 9, e106709 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Rizzo, D.J., White, J.D., Spedden, E., Wiens, M.R., Kaplan, D.L., Atherton, T.J., and Staii, C.: Neuronal growth as diffusion in an effective potential. Phys. Rev. E 88, 042707 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Schienbein, M and Gruler, H.: Langevin equation, Fokker-Planck equation and cell migration. Bull. Math. Biol. 55, 585–608 (1993).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Betz, T., Lim, D., and Kas, J.A.: Neuronal growth: a bistable stochastic process. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098103 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Risken, H.: Fokker-Planck equation for several variables: methods of solutions. In The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, Haken, H. ed. Springer: Berlin, 1996; p. 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Moore, S.W. and Sheetz, M.P.: Biophysics of substrate interaction: influence on neural motility, differentiation, and repair. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 1090–1101 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Frey, M.T., Tsai, I.Y., Russell, T.P., Hanks, S.K., and Wang, Y.L.: Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. Biophys. J. 90, 3774–3782 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed