Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:29:41.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-Time Monitoring of Epitaxial Processes by Parallel-Polarized Reflectance Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Nikolaus Dietz  and
Klaus J. Bachmann
Get access

Extract

The engineering of advanced micro-electronic circuits, optoelectronic devices, and integrated optical circuits requires precise control of the lateral dimensions and thicknesses of device features and of the stoichiometry and doping of epitaxial semiconductor regions. This is preferably achieved by real-time monitoring and control of the individual deposition and etching processes that constitute the processing sequence. The use of optical probe techniques for the real-time monitoring of etching and/or growth processes is favored because of their nondestructive character and their potential use in real-time feedback control. Some of these methods are ideal in monitoring the overall growth process and/or substrate temperature in industrial applications, requiring low cost and maintenance. For example, in situ reflectance-spectroscopy methods, such as dynamic optical reflectivity (DOS), spectral-resolved normal incidence reflectance spectroscopy (MRS), or pyrometric interferometry (PI), are successfully applied to various deposition processes and provide information on both the growth rate and the composition of the deposits. However, small changes in the reflectance (because of chemical interactions at the surface of the films with the reactants supplied from the vapor phase) are of the order of 10−3 to 10−4 and are hardly observable with normal-incidence reflectance techniques because of the high reflectivity of substrate/film interface, which is typically of the order of 40%–60% for many semiconductors.

In order to increase the sensitivity to surface- and interface-related growth properties, alternative optical-observation methods such as reflectance difference spectroscopy (RDS), surface photoabsorption (SPA), and spectral ellipsometry (SE) have been developed.

Type
In Situ, Real-Time Characterization of Thin-Film Growth Processes
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , May 1995 , pp. 49 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Armstrong, J.V., Farrell, T., Joyce, T.B., Kightley, P., T.J. Bullough, and Goodhew, P.J., J. Cryst. Growth 120 (1992) p. 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Killeen, K.P. and Breiland, W.G., J. Electron. Mater. 23 (2) (1993) p. 279.Google Scholar
3.Grothe, H. and Boebel, F.G., J. Cryst. Growth 127 (1993) p. 1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Aspnes, D.E., Harbison, J.P., Studna, A.A., and Florez, L.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (12) (1988) p. 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Aspnes, D.E., Proc. SPIE 1285, edited by Madhukar, Anupam (International Society of Optical Engineers, 1990) p. 2.Google Scholar
6.Kobayashi, N. and Horikoshi, Y., Jpn. Appl. Phys. 28 (11) (1989) p. L1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Horikoshi, Y., Prog. in Cryst. Growth and Characterization of Mater. 23 (1992) p. 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Aspnes, D.E., Quinn, W.E., and Gregory, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (25) (1990) p. 2,569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Aspnes, D.E., Quinn, W.E., and Gregory, S., J. Vac. Sci. & Technol. A 9 (3) (1991) p. 870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Dietz, N., Miller, A.E., Kelliher, J.T., Venables, D., and Bachmann, K.J., J. Cryst. Growth in press.Google Scholar
11.Dietz, N., Miller, A.E., and Bachmann, K.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13 (1995) p. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Bachmann, K.J., Dietz, N., Miller, A.E., Venables, D., and Kelliher, J.T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13 (3) in press.Google Scholar
13.Miller, A.E., Kelliher, J.T., Dietz, N., and Bachmann, K.J., in Evolution ofThin-Film and Surface Structure and Morphology, edited by Demczyk, B.G., Williams, E.D., Garfunkel, E., Clemens, B.M., and Cuomo, J.E. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 355, Pittsburgh, 1995).Google Scholar
14.Humphreys-Owen, S.P.F.b.t.l., Proc. Phys. Soc. 77 (1961) p. 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Dietz, N. and Lewerenz, H.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 (19) (1992) p. 2,403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Dietz, N. and Lewerenz, H.J., Appl. Surf. Sci. 69 (1993) p. 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Azzam, R.M.A., Appl. Optics 22 (24) (1983) p. 4,155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Dietz, N., Stephens, D.J., Lucovsky, G., and Bachmann, K.J., in Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials Processing, edited by Glembocki, O.J., Pang, S.W., Pollak, F.H., Crean, G.M., and Larrabee, G. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 324, Pittsburgh, 1994) p. 27.Google Scholar
19.Kelliher, J.T., Thornton, J., Dietz, N., Lucovsky, G. and Bachmann, K.J., Mat. Sci. & Eng. B 22 (1993) p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lu, Z., Habermehl, S., Lucovsky, G., Dietz, N., and Bachmann, K.J., in Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Cleaning Technol. in Semiconductor Device Manufacturing 94–97 (New Orleans, 1994) p. 416.Google Scholar
21.Habermehl, S., Dietz, N., Lu, Z., Bachmann, K.J., and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12 (4) (1994) p. 990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Kobayashi, N., Makimoto, T., Yamauchi, Y., and Horikoshi, Y., J. Cryst. Growth 107 (1–4) (1991) p. 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Pirouz, P., Ernst, F., and Cheng, T.T., in Heteroepitaxy on Silicon: Fundamentals, Structures, and Devices, edited by Choi, H.K., Hull, R., Ishiwara, H., and Nemanich, R.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 116, Pittsburgh, 1988) p. 57.Google Scholar
24.Ernst, F. and Pirouz, P., J. Appl. Phys. 64 (9) (1988) p. 4,526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar