Hostname: page-component-7d8f8d645b-2q4x6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-28T16:29:38.742Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

Production Aspects of Organic Photovoltaics and Their Impact on the Commercialization of Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Christoph J. Brabec ,
Jens A. Hauch ,
Pavel Schilinsky  and
Christoph Waldauf
Get access

Abstract

The essential cost-driving factor for the production of classical photovoltaic devices is the expensive investment in costly semiconductor processing technologies. This unfavorable cost structure has so far prohibited the technology from having a significant impact on global energy production. Nevertheless, the continued high interest in photovoltaics originates from the fact that they represent the only truly portable renewable-energy conversion technology available today. Therefore, the potential of fabricating organic photovoltaic elements on low-cost, thin plastic substrates by standard printing and coating techniques and packaged by lamination is not only intriguing, but highly attractive from a cost standpoint. In this article, we discuss the economic and technical production aspects for organic photovoltaics.

Keywords

organic photovoltaicspolymer electronicsprinting technologies.
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 30 , Issue 1: Technical Theme: Organic–Based Photovoltaics , January 2005 , pp. 50 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Morita, S., Zakhidov, A.A., and Yoshino, K., Solid State Commun. 82 (1992) p. 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Halls, J.J.M., Walsh, C.A., Greenham, N.C., Marseglia, E.A., Friend, R.H., Moratti, S.C., and Holmes, A.B., Nature 376 (1995) p. 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Yu, G., Gao, J., Hummelen, J.C., Wudl, F., and Heeger, A.J., Science 270 (1995) p. 1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sariciftci, N.S., Smilowitz, L., Heeger, A.J., and Wudl, F., Science 258 (1992) p. 1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Schilinsky, P., Waldauf, C., Riedel, I., Dyakonov, V., and Brabec, C.J., unpublished.Google Scholar
6.Schilinsky, P., Waldauf, C., and Brabec, C.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (1) (2002) p. 3885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Waldauf, C., Schilinsky, P., Hauch, J., and Brabec, C.J., Thin Solid Films 451–452 (2004) p. 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar