Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T02:59:39.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of the Binder/Solvent Pair on the Electrochemical Performance of Aluminium Batteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2019

Jasmin Smajic ,
Amira Alazmi  and
Pedro M. F. J. Costa Open the ORCID record for Pedro M. F. J. Costa [Opens in a new window]
Jasmin Smajic
Affiliation:
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Physical Science and Engineering Division, Thuwal23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
Amira Alazmi
Affiliation:
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Physical Science and Engineering Division, Thuwal23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
Pedro M. F. J. Costa*
Affiliation:
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Physical Science and Engineering Division, Thuwal23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
*
*(Email: Pedro.DaCosta@KAUST.EDU.SA)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In energy storage systems, every component that makes up an electrode can greatly affect the electrochemical performance. One example includes the so-called “binders” used in secondary batteries. Herein, we compare the influence of using polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) or sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) on the electrochemical performance of an aluminium chloride battery (ACB) system. The active material of the cathode was a reduced graphene oxide dried under supercritical conditions (RGOCPD). Interestingly, while PVDF enabled one of the highest capacities reported for ACBs, the CMC resulted in a significant degradation of the cell’s performance.

Keywords

energy storageCgrapheneporosityAl
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 14: Energy-Transfer, Storage and Conversion , 2019 , pp. 807 - 812
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019

References

REFERENCES

Smajic, J., Alazmi, A., Patole, S. and Costa, P. M. F. J., RSC Advances, 7(63), 39997-40004 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smajic, J., Alazmi, A., Batra, N., Palanisamy, T., Anjum, D. H. and Costa, P. M. F. J., Small, 1803584 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alazmi, A., Tall, O., Rasul, S., Hedhili, M. N., Patole, S. P. and Costa, P. M. F. J., Nanoscale 8(41), 17782-17787 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alazmi, A., Rasul, S., Patole, S. P. and Costa, P. M. F. J., Polyhedron, 116, 153-161 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormashenko, Y., Pogreb, R., Stanevsky, O. and Bormashenko, E., Polymer Testing, 23(7), 791-796 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adarsh, K. and Ramaprabhu, S., AIP Advances 2(3), 032183 (2012)Google Scholar
Hina, S., Zhang, Y. and Wang, H., Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 40, 215-226 (2015)Google Scholar
Zhao, T., Liu, L., Li, G., Du, L., Zhao, X., Yan, J., Cheng, Y., Dang, A. and Li, T., Chinese Science Bulletin 57(14), 1620-1625 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anna, M., Laskowska, A., Boiteux, G., Zaborski, M., Gain, O. and Serghei, A., Macromolecular Symposia, 341(1), 7-17 (2014)Google Scholar