Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:08:46.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement for the Dissociation Conditions of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Hydrate in the Presence of Additive Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Yan-Ping Chen ,
Li-Jen Chen ,
Shiang-Tai Lin  and
Muoi Tang
Yan-Ping Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Li-Jen Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Shiang-Tai Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Muoi Tang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
*(Email: ypchen@ccms.ntu.edu.tw)
Get access

Abstract

We report in this study the dissociation conditions for the carbon dioxide hydrate in the presence of additive materials. We measured the hydrate-water-vapor (H-Lw-V) three-phase equilibrium data using the isochoric method. Examples of these phase equilibrium data for the additive materials of 1,3,5-trioxane, 2,5-dihydrofuran, 1,3-dioxolane, and 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran are presented. The experimental pressure range is from 1.6 to 3.3 MPa, and the concentration of each additive is at 10 wt%. The experimental results indicate that cyclic ethers of 1,3,5-trioxane, 2,5-dihydrofuran, and 1,3-dioxolane promote the formation of carbon dioxide hydrate. Their promotion effects at a given pressure are up to 5 K, 6.9 K, and 4.2 K, respectively, The additive material of 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran, however, shows the inhibitor behavior. The average inhibition effect is about 1.3 K at a given pressure.

Keywords

additivesphase equilibriaenergy storage
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 15: Energy and Sustainability , 2016 , pp. 1013 - 1019
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sloan, E.D., Koh, C.A., Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, Third Edition (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatti, I., Delahaye, A., Fournaison, L., Petitet, J.-P., Benefits and drawbacks of clathrate hydrates: a review of their areas of interest, Energ Convers Manage, 46 (2005) 1333–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, H.J., Robinson, D.B., Hydrate Formation in Systems Containing Methane, Ethane, Propane, Carbon-Dioxide or Hydrogen-Sulfide in the Presence of Methanol, Fluid Phase Equilibr, 21 (1985) 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, S.S., Guo, T.M., Hydrate formation of CO2-rich binary and quaternary gas mixtures in aqueous sodium chloride solutions, J Chem Eng Data, 44 (1999) 829–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., Meyer, L., IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
Rochelle, C.A., Camps, A.P., Long, D., Milodowski, A., Bateman, K., Gunn, D., Jackson, P., Lovell, M.A., Rees, J., Can CO2 hydrate assist in the underground storage of carbon dioxide?, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 319 (2009) 171–183.Google Scholar
Mooijer-van den Heuvel, M.M., Witteman, R., Peters, C.J., Phase behaviour of gas hydrates of carbon dioxide in the presence of tetrahydropyran, cyclobutanone, cyclohexane and methylcyclohexane, Fluid Phase Equilibr, 182 (2001) 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, Y., Kang, S.P., Lee, S., Lee, H., Experimental Measurements of Hydrate Phase Equilibria for Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of THF, Propylene Oxide, and 1,4-Dioxane, J Chem Eng Data, 53 (2008) 2833–2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabil, K.M., Witkamp, G.J., Peters, C.J., Phase equilibria of mixed carbon dioxide and tetrahydrofuran hydrates in sodium chloride aqueous solutions, Fluid Phase Equilibr, 284 (2009) 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tohidi, B., Burgass, R.W., Danesh, A., Ostergaard, K.K., Todd, A.C., Improving the accuracy of gas hydrate dissociation point measurements, Ann Ny Acad Sci, 912 (2000) 924–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, P.C., Chen, L.J., Lin, S.T., Chen, Y.P., Measurements for the dissociation conditions of methane hydrate in the presence of tert-butanol, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55 (2010) 5036–5039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, T., Equilibrium Conditions for Carbon Dioxide Hydrates in the Presence of Aqueous Solutions of Alcohols, Glycols, and Glycerol, J Chem Eng Data, 55 (2010) 1280–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sa, J.H., Lee, B.R., Park, D.H., Han, K., Chun, H.D., Lee, K.H., Amino Acids as Natural Inhibitors for Hydrate Formation in CO2 Sequestration, Environ Sci Technol, 45 (2011) 5885–5891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heriot-Watt University Hydrate model: http://www.pet.hw.ac.uk/research/hydrate/, (accessed on December 10,2015).Google Scholar