Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:38:53.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances Toward Forming Synthetic Mimetic Tendon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Dilinazi Aishanjiang*
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A
Emily C. Green
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A
Heng Li
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A
Marilyn L. Minus
Affiliation:
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Collagen is the most abundant protein present in the human body and found in connective tissues, bone, and tendon. It is also known as a natural resource for healing damaged skin tissues [1]. In this study, under specific microenvironment conditions, mimetic collagen gels were successfully formed synthetically from reconstituted Bovine type I collagen monomers. This was achieved by controlling ionic strength, temperature and pH, allowing fibrils with native mimetic D periodic banding structure to assemble spontaneously within the gels. In addition, by providing appropriate aging temperatures and times, mature collagen fibril growth is also realized in the gels in vitro. Mimetic gels were subsequently formed into fibers through a wet-spinning process. These spun fibers were found to preserve the native mimetic D periodic banding and fibrillar structure formed in the initial gels. As a result, the synthetic fibers resemble native tendon. Here structural development within the gel samples and fibers as a function of processing was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results in this study also show a potentially new route for the fabrication of synthetic collagen fibers mimicking tendon, which may find applications as engineered tissues or scaffolding materials.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boateng, J. S., Matthews, K. H., Stevens, H. N. E. and Eccleston, G. M., J. Pharm. Sci. 97 (8), 28922923 (2008).Google Scholar
Goh, K. L., Meakin, J. R., Aspden, R. M. and Hukins, D. W., Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 272 (1575), 1979-1983 (2005).Google Scholar
Hascall, V. C. and Kuettner, K. E., The Many Faces of Osteoarthritis. (Birkhäuser Basel, 2012), pp. 121124.Google Scholar
Caves, J. M., Kumar, V. A., Wen, J., Cui, W., Martinez, A., Apkarian, R., Coats, J. E., Berland, K. and Chaikof, E. L., Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 93 (1), 2438 (2010).Google Scholar
Zeugolis, D. I., Khew, S. T., Yew, E. S. Y., Ekaputra, A. K., Tong, Y. W., Yung, L.-Y. L., Hutmacher, D. W., Sheppard, C. and Raghunath, M., Biomaterials 29 (15), 22932305 (2008).Google Scholar
Provenzano, P. P. and Vanderby, R. Jr, Matrix Biology 25 (2), 7184 (2006).Google Scholar
Zeugolis, D. I., Paul, R. G. and Attenburrow, G., Acta Biomaterialia 4 (6), 16461656 (2008).Google Scholar
Wang, M. C., Pins, G. D. and Silver, F. H., Biomaterials 15 (7), 507512 (1994).Google Scholar
Orgel, J. P. R. O., Miller, A., Irving, T. C., Fischetti, R. F., Hammersley, A. P. and Wess, T. J., Structure 9 (11), 10611069 (2001).Google Scholar
Bozec, L., van der Heijden, G. and Horton, M., Biophysical Journal 92 (1), 7075 (2007).Google Scholar
Giraud-Guille, M.-M., Belamie, E., Mosser, G., Helary, C., Gobeaux, F. and Vigier, S., Comptes Rendus Chimie 11 (3), 245252 (2008).Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. and McGrath, K., Protein-Based Materials. (Birkhäuser Boston, 2012), pp. 283285.Google Scholar