Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-598jt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-29T08:25:10.149Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Challenges and Solutions for Handling and Characterizing Alkali-Tc-Oxide Salts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Jamie L. Weaver
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA99164, USA Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA
Chuck Soderquist
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA
Nancy Washton
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA
Paul Gassman
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA
Eric Walter
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA
Mark Bowden
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA
Wayne Lukens
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA94720, USA
John S. McCloy*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA99164, USA Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA99352, USA Materials Science and Engineering Program and School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA99164, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

Though not often discussed explicitly in literature, sample handling and preparation for advanced characterization techniques is a significant challenge for radiological materials. In this contribution, a detailed description is given of method development associated with characterization of highly radioactive and, in some cases, hygroscopic oxides of technetium. Details are given on developed protocols, fixtures, and tooling designed for x-ray and neutron diffraction, x-ray absorption, Raman spectroscopy, magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance, and electron paramagnetic resonance. In some cases, multiple iterations of improved sample holder design are described. Lessons learned in handling Tc compounds for these and similar characterization methods are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Segre, E. and Seaborg, G., Phys. Rev. 54, 772 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, E., Libson, K., Jurisson, S. and Lindoy, L.F., In Progress in Inorganic Chemistry, edited by Lippard, S. J., (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1983), pp. 75.Google Scholar
Schwochau, K., Technetium: Chemistry and Radiopharmaceutical Applications, (Wiley, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitsin, V.I., Rosenfeld, I.L., Persiantseva, V.P., Zamoshnikova, N.N. and Kuzina, A.F., Corrosion 21, 211 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, T. and Mazaki, H., Phys. Rev. B 20, 131 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little-Marenin, I.R. and Little, S.J., Astronom. J. 84, 1374 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goriely, S., In Capture Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy and Related Topics, edited, (World Scientific, 2013), pp. 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmitt, R.D.W. and Peacock, R.D., The chemistry of manganese, technetium, and rhenium: Pergamon texts in inorganic chemistry, (Pergamon Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Stennett, M.C., Lee, T.-H., Bailey, D.J., Johnstone, E.V., Heo, J. and Hyatt, N.C., MRS Adv. 2, 753 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. and Kruger, A.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids in press, (2017).Google Scholar
Soderquist, C.Z., Buck, E.C., McCloy, J.S., Schweiger, M.J. and Kruger, A.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 3924 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeway, J.J., Qafoku, N.P., Williams, B.D., Snyder, M.M.V., Brown, C.F. and Pierce, E.M., Appl. Geochem. 66, 210 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukens, W.W., Magnani, N., Tyliszczak, T., Pearce, C.I. and Shuh, D.K., Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 13160 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, B.C., Braband, H., Lawler, K., Mast, D.S., Bigler, L., Stalder, U., Forster, P.M., Czerwinski, K.R., Alberto, R., Sattelberger, A.P. and Poineau, F., Inorg. Chem. 55, 10445 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, D., Kim, D., Schweiger, M.J., Kruger, A.A. and Thallapally, P.K., Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 2724 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegg, I., Radioanal, J.. Nucl. Chem. 305, 1 (2015).Google Scholar
Luksic, S.A., Riley, B.J., Schweiger, M. and Hrma, P., J. Nucl. Mater. 466, 526 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, J., Soderquist, C.Z., Washton, N.M., Lipton, A.S., Gassman, P.L., Lukens, W.W., Kruger, A.A., Wall, N.A. and McCloy, J.S., Inorg. Chem. 56, 2533 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, J., Soderquist, C., Gassman, P., Walter, E., Lukens, W. and McCloy, J.S., MRS Adv. 2, 525 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.-S., Um, W., Wang, G., Kruger, A.A., Lukens, W.W., Rousseau, R. and Glezakou, V.-A., Nat. Commun. 7, 12067 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, R.M., Neeway, J.J., Lawter, A.R., Levitskaia, T.G., Lukens, W.W. and Qafoku, N.P., J. Nucl. Mater. 480, 393 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, J.O., Harsh, J.B., Lukens, W.W. and Pierce, E.M., Chem. Geol. 395, 138 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderquist, C.Z., Schweiger, M.J., Kim, D.-S., Lukens, W.W. and McCloy, J.S., J. Nucl. Mater. 449, 173 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buechele, A.C., McKeown, D.A., Lukens, W.W., Shuh, D.K. and Pegg, I.L., J. Nucl. Mater. 429, 159 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuclear Industry Workforce Getting Younger, Nuclear Energy Institute, www.nei.org (2015).Google Scholar
Squires, L.N., Mariani, R.D., Hartmann, T. and Kennedy, J.R., Adv. X-ray Anal. 56, 54 (2012).Google Scholar
Gassman, P.L., McCloy, J.S., Soderquist, C.Z. and Schweiger, M.J., J. Raman Spectros. 45, 139 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar