Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:36:29.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpretive approaches and the study of Italian politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2016

James L. Newell*
Affiliation:
European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT. Telephone: 0161 295 5660, Fax 0161 295 5077. E-mail: j.l.newell@salford.ac.uk

Extract

This article asks why, despite their doubtful utility, the categories used in accounts of contemporary Italian politics are almost universally negative in character. It is suggested that at least part of the explanation has to do with the ontological and epistemological assumptions informing the accounts, together with the social circumstances that have given rise to their production. More fruitful, less uncritically negative analyses require the adoption of approaches informed by alternative ontologies and epistemologies, that is, interpretive approaches. These seek to account for social phenomena by rendering intelligible the meaningful action in which the latter are rooted and, as the example of corruption shows, yield less negative accounts by allowing researchers to imagine themselves acting, given similar circumstances, in ways similar to those they study.

Type
Contexts and Debates
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Ginsborg, Paul, ‘Italian Political Culture in Historical Perspective’, Modern Italy , 1, 1, 1995, pp. 317, p. 4.Google Scholar

2. Dickie, John, ‘Imagined Italies’, in Forgacs, David and Lumley, Robert (eds), Italian Cultural Studies: An Introduction , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996, pp. 1933, p. 19.Google Scholar

3. Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Ibid. , p. 12.Google Scholar

5. Ibid. , p. 402–4.Google Scholar

6. Ibid. , p. 403.Google Scholar

7. Ibid. , p. 13.Google Scholar

8. Cassese, Sabino, ‘Il sistema amministrativo italiano, ovvero l'arte di arrangiarsi’, in Cassese, Sabino and Franchini, Claudio (eds), L'amministrazione publica italiana: un profilo , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1994, pp. 1321.Google Scholar

9. Ginsborg, Paul, L'Italia del tempo presente: famiglia, società civile, Stato , Einaudi, Turin, 1998.Google Scholar

10. Cassese, , ‘Il sistema amministrativo italiano’, p. 18.Google Scholar

11. Sani, Giacomo, ‘The Political Culture of Italy: Continuity and Change’, in Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney (eds), The Civic Culture Revisited , Sage, Newbury Park, London and New Delhi, 1980, p. 276.Google Scholar

12. Almond, and Verba, , The Civic Culture , pp. 273324, p. 99.Google Scholar

13. Ibid. p. 105.Google Scholar

14. Sani, , ‘The Political Culture of Italy’, p. 281.Google Scholar

15. Almond, and Verba, , The Civic Culture , p.490.Google Scholar

16. LaPalombara, Joseph, Democracy Italian Style , Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987, p. 50; Newell, James L., ‘Democratic Destination: The Examples of Britain and Italy’, in Garrard, John, Tolz, Vera and White, Ralph (eds), European Democratization since 1800, Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2000, pp. 246–7.Google Scholar

17. Almond, and Verba, , The Civic Culture , p.404.Google Scholar

18. LaPalombara, , Democracy Italian Style , pp. 237–80.Google Scholar

19. Rosenberg, Alexander, Philosophy of Social Science , Westview Press, Boulder, 1988, p. 28.Google Scholar

20. Ibid. , p. 38.Google Scholar

21. Ibid. Google Scholar

22. Ibid. , p. 41.Google Scholar

23. Ibid. , p. 43–4.Google Scholar

24. Little, Daniel, Varieties of Social Explanation: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Science , Westview Press, Boulder, 1991, p. 72.Google Scholar

25. Bryman, Alan, Social Research Methods , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, p. 269.Google Scholar

26. Berger, Peter and Luckman, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality , Penguin, Harmondswoth, 1967.Google Scholar

27. Ibid. , p. 75.Google Scholar

28. Ibid. Google Scholar

29. Bull, Martin J. and Newell, James L., ‘New Avenues in the Study of Political Corruption’, Crime, Law and Social Change , 27, 3–4, 1997, pp. 169–83, p. 173.Google Scholar

30. Lancaster, Thomas D. and Montinola, Gabriella R., ‘Toward a Methodology for the Comparative Study of Political Corruption’, Crime, Law and Social Change , 27, 3–4, 1997, pp. 185206, p. 95.Google Scholar

31. Van Duyne, Petrus C., Huberts, Leo W.J.C. and Hans, J. van den Heuvel, J., ‘Political Corruption in the Netherlands’, in Bull, Martin J. and Newell, James L., Corruption in Contemporary Politics , Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 149–63.Google Scholar

32. Berger, and Luckman, , The Social Construction of Reality , p. 126.Google Scholar

33. Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy , Routledge, London, 1958, p. 33.Google Scholar

34. Ibid. , p. 51.Google Scholar

35. Ibid. , pp. 7480.Google Scholar

36. Ibid. , p. 75.Google Scholar

37. Ibid. , p. 77.Google Scholar

38. Ibid. , p. 82, emphasis in the original.Google Scholar

39. Colaprico, Piero, Capire Tangentopoli , Il Saggiatore, Milan, 1996, pp. 31–2, author's translation and emphasis.Google Scholar

40. LaPalombara, , Democracy Italian Style , p. 50.Google Scholar

41. Ginsborg, Paul, ‘Explaining Italy's Crisis’, in Gundle, Stephen and Parker, Simon (eds), The New Italian Republic: From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi , Routledge, London, 1996, pp. 1939, p. 29.Google Scholar

42. Ibid. , p. 24.Google Scholar

43. Ibid., pp. 24–5.Google Scholar

44. LaPalombara, , Democracy Italian Style , pp. 3451, p. 51.Google Scholar

45. Ibid. Google Scholar

46. As Michael Eve (‘Comparing Italy: The Case of Corruption’, in Forgacs, and Lumley, , Italian Cultural Studies , pp. 36–7) notes, variation in the visibility of an issue between countries reminds us that the information we have about such phenomena as corruption ‘is not just naturally “given”, but is socially constructed’.Google Scholar