Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:40:44.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling evolution in the near field of a cementitious repository

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. R. Hoch ,
G. M. N. Baston ,
F. P. Glasser ,
F. M. I. Hunter  and
V. Smith
A. R. Hoch*
Affiliation:
AMEC, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QB, UK
G. M. N. Baston
Affiliation:
AMEC, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QB, UK
F. P. Glasser
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, School of Natural and Computing Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Meston Building, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK
F. M. I. Hunter
Affiliation:
AMEC, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QB, UK
V. Smith
Affiliation:
AMEC, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QB, UK
*
*E-mail: andrew.hoch@amec.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the United Kingdom, disposal of radioactive waste may involve packages of grouted waste being placed in a geological disposal facility (GDF) and surrounded by a cementitious backfill. This paper describes modelling that has been carried out to develop an understanding of the possible spatial and temporal evolution within the GDF.

A single waste package is assumed to be filled with an encapsulation grout, placed in an underground vault and surrounded by a cementitious backfill. Groundwater from the host rock flows into the vault and through the backfill. A simplified model system examines the interactions between groundwater, cementitious backfill and grout.

In most cases the model predicts a reduction in the backfill porosity due to precipitation and dissolution reactions, particularly at the upstream edge of the vault. The degree to which this occurs depends on the groundwater composition. The model also predicts precipitation and dissolution reactions would occur in the grouts close to their interface with the backfill, reducing the local porosity significantly which may isolate the grouts from the backfill, so that the pH within the grouts would be unchanged over an extended period.

Keywords

transport modellingTOUGHREACTcementgeological disposal facilityradioactive waste
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 8 , December 2012 , pp. 3055 - 3069
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2012] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

References

Allen, A.J., Thomas, J.J. and Jennings, H.M. (2007) Composition and density of nanoscale calciumsilicate- hydrate in cement. Nature Materials, 6, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, A.J., Chambers, A.V., Jackson, C.P., Porter, J.D., Sinclair, J.E., Sumner, P.J., Thorne, M.C. and Watson, S.P.(1997) Nirex 97. An Assessment of the Post-closure Performance of a Deep Waste Repository at Sellafield. Volume 3: the Groundwater Pathway. Nirex, Science Report S/97/ 012.*Google Scholar
Balonis, M. and Glasser, F.P. (2009) The density of cement phases. Cement and Concrete Research 39, 733–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baston, G.M.N., Glasser, F.P., Smith, V. and Hoch, A.R. (2011) Modelling pH evolution in the near-field of a geological disposal facility for ILW/LLW. Serco Report SERCO/003011/002b Issue 2b.*Google Scholar
Baur, I., Keler, P., Mavrocordatos, D., Wehrli B. and Johnson, C.A. (2004) Dissolution-precipitation behaviour of ettringite, monosulfate, and calcium silicate hydrate. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, U.R. (1988) Modelling the incongruent dissolution of hydrated cement minerals. Radiochimica Acta, 44/55, 387–393.Google Scholar
Bond, K.A. and Tweed, C.J. (1995) Groundwater Compositions for the Borrowdale Volcanics Group, Boreholes 2, 4 and RCF3, Sellafield, Evaluated using Thermodynamic Modelling. Nirex Report NSS/R397.*Google Scholar
Carey, J.W. and Lichtner P.C. (2007) Calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) solid solution model applied to cement degradation using the continuum reactive transport model FLOTRAN. Pp. 73–106.in: Transport Properties and Concrete Quality: Materials Science of Concrete (B. Mobasher and J. Skalny, editors) American Ceramic Society Special Volume. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Chen, J.J., Thomas, J.J., Taylor, H.F.W.and Jennings, H.M. (2004) Solubility and structure of calcium silicate hydrate. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 1499–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, J. and Glasser, F.P. (1992) The reaction between cement and natural waters containing dissolved carbon dioxide. Advances in Cement Research, 4, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, A.J., Cather, R. and Crossland, I.G. (1997) Nirex Safety Assessment Research Programme: Development of the Nirex Reference Vault Backfill. Nirex Report S/97/014.*Google Scholar
Gaucher, E.C., Blanc, P., Bardot, F., Braibant, G., Buschaert, S., Crouzet, C., Gautier, A., Girard, J., Jacqout, E., Lassin, A., Negrel, G., Tournassat, C., Vinsot, A. and Altmann, S. (2006) Modelling the porewater chemistry of the Callovian-Oxfordian formation at a regional scale. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 338, 917–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, L.J., Harris, A.W. and Haworth, A. (2001) Calculation of the Volume of Backfill Required in the Near-field of a Repository. AEA Technology Report AEAT/ERRA-2270.*Google Scholar
Greenberg, S.A. and Chang, T.N. (1965) Investigation of colloidal hydrated calcium silicates: ii. Solubility relationships in the calcium oxideu` silica–water system at 25ºC. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 69, 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A.W. and Nickerson, A.K. (1995) The Masstransport Properties of Cementitious Materials for Radioactive Waste Repository Construction. Nirex Report NSS/R309.*Google Scholar
Harris, A.W., Manning, M.C., Tearle W.M. and Tweed, C.J. (2002) Testing of models of the dissolution of cements-leaching of synthetic C-S-H gels. Cement and Concrete Research, 32, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A.W., Manning, M.C. and Tearle, W.M. (2003) Carbonation of Nirex Reference Backfill. Serco Report SERCO/ERRA-0454.*Google Scholar
Heath, T.G. and Hunter, F.M.I. (2012) Calculation of Near-field pH buffering: Effect of Polymer Encapsulant. Serco Report SA/ENV-0909 Issue 2.*Google Scholar
Heath, T.G., Hunter, F.M.I., Magalhaes, S. and Smith, V. (2011) Spreadsheet Model for the Impact of Waste Packages on Local pH Conditioning. Serco Report SERCO/TAS/000356/01 Issue 1.*Google Scholar
Holland, T.R. and Tearle, W.M. (2003) A Review of NRVB Mineralogy. Serco Report SERCO/ERRA- 0455.*Google Scholar
Hummel, W., Berner, U., Curti, E., Pearson, F.J. and Thoenen, T. (2002) Nagra/PSI Chemical Thermodynamic Data Base 01/01. Nagra Report NTB 02–16. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kulik, D.A. and Kersten, M. (2001) Aqueous solubility diagrams for cementitious waste stabilization systems: II, End-member-stoichiometries of ideal calcium silicate hydrate solid solutions. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 84, 3017–3026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtner, P.C. and Carey, J.W. (2006) Incorporating solid solutions in reactive transport equations using a discrete-composition approach. Geochiminica et Cosmochimica Acta, 70, 1356–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lothenbach, B. and Winnefeld, F. (2006) Thermodynamic modelling of the hydration of Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 36, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lothenbach, B., Matschei, T., Möschner, G. and Glasser, F.P. (2008) Thermodynamic modelling of the effect of temperature on the hydration and porosity of Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marty, N.C.M., Tournassat, C., Burnol, A., Giffaut, E. and Gaucher, E.C. (2009) Influence of reaction kinetics and mesh refinement on the numerical modelling of concrete/clay interactions. Journal of Hydrology, 364, 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matschei, T., Lothenbach, B. and Glasser, F.P. (2007) Thermodynamic properties of Portland cement hydrates in the system CaO-Al2O3–SiO2-CaSO4- CaCO3-H2O. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 1379–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nirex (1994) Dounreay Geological Investigations: Hydrogeology. Nirex Report 660.*Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010a) Geological Disposal: Radionuclide Behaviour Status Report. NDA Report NDA/RWMD/034..Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010b) Geological Disposal: Near-field Evolution Status Report. NDA Report NDA/RWMD/033..Google Scholar
Qian, J.C., Lachowski, E.E. and Glasser, F.P. (1988) Microstructure and chemical variation in class F fly ash glass. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 113, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, J.S. and Thompson, O.R. (2008) Development of a Model of the Spatial and Temporal Evolution of pH in Cementitious Backfill of a Geological Repository. National Nuclear Laboratory Report NNL(08) 9601 Issue 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, B.T., Bamforth, P.B., Hoch, A.R., Jackson, C.P., Roberts, D.A.and Baston, G.M.N. (2010) Cracking, Flow and Chemistry in NRVB. Serco Report SERCO/TAS/000505/01 Issue 2.*Google Scholar
Swift, B.T., Bamforth, P.B. and Baston, G.M.N. (2012) Cracking in a cementitious backfill, and the implications for flow and chemistry. Mineralogical Magazine, 76, 3071–3082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C.S., Savage, D., Tyrer, M. and Vala Ragnarsdottir, K. (2007) Non-ideal solid solution aqueous solution modeling of synthetic calcium silicon hydrate. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, T., Sonnenthal, E., Spycher, N. and Pruess, K. (2004) TOUGHREACT User’s Guide: A Simulation Program for Non-isothermal Multiphase Reactive Geochemical Transport in Variably Saturated Geologic Media. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report LBNL-55460. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA. CrossRefGoogle Scholar