Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:13:54.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of standard thermodynamic properties and solubility data for baryte, Ba2+(aq) and SO42–(aq)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

B. Y. Zhen-Wu*
Affiliation:
Nano-Science Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen OE, Denmark Maersk Oil and Gas A/S, Esplanaden 50, 1263 Copenhagen K, Denmark
K. Dideriksen*
Affiliation:
Nano-Science Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen OE, Denmark
D. A. Belova
Affiliation:
Nano-Science Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen OE, Denmark
P. J. Raahauge
Affiliation:
Maersk Oil and Gas A/S, Esplanaden 50, 1263 Copenhagen K, Denmark
S. L. S. Stipp
Affiliation:
Nano-Science Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen OE, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The thermodynamic solubility product for baryte, determined at standard conditions, from data in commonly used compilations, was compared with published experimental solubility products for baryte and with the solubility products from databases used by the PHREEQC geochemical speciation code and MultiScale, which is often used by oil companies to predict or describe baryte scaling. The values in the various databases agree well with experimental data (10–10.05–10–9.96; Melcher, 1910; Neuman, 1933; Templeton, 1960; Davis and Collins, 1971; Blount, 1977; Felmy et al., 1990), which agree within uncertainty with the values presented in the compilations of Robie et al. (1979), Wagman et al. (1982), Lide (2005), Raju and Atkinson (1988), as well as Nordstrom and Munoz (1994), whose values have the least uncertainty. In solutions of 50% seawater mixed with 50% reservoir formation waters, the data predict baryte supersaturation, both at standard temperature and at the temperatures expected in the reservoir, completely consistent with field observations. This provides confidence that the Pitzer approach for activity correction and the database is valid for investigations of baryte precipitation rates in high ionic strength solutions.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2014] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014

References

Blount, C.W. (1977) Barite solubilities and thermodynamic quantities up to 300ºC and 1400 bars. American Mineralogist, 62, 942957.Google Scholar
Brown, O.L.I., Smith, W.V. and Latimer, W.M. (1936) The heat capacity and entropy of barium chloride dihydrate from 15 to 300ºK. The heat of solution of barium chloride dihydrate. The entropy of barium ion. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 58, 17581759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busenberg, E. and Plummer, L.N. (1986) The solubility of BaCO3(cr) (witherite) in CO2-H2O solutions between 0 and 90ºC, evaluation of the association constants of BaHCO3(aq) + and BaCO3(aq) o between 5 and 80ºC, and a preliminary evaluation of the thermodynamic properties of Ba2+ (aq).. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 50, 2225–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busenberg, E., Plummer, L.N. and Parker, V.B. (1984) The solubility of strontianite (SrCO3) in CO2-H2O solutions between 2 and 91ºC, the association constants of SrHCO+ 3(aq) and SrCO0 3 (aq) between 5 and 80ºC, and an evaluation of the thermodynamic properties of Sr2+(aq) and SrCO3(cr) at 25ºC and 1 atm total pressure. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 48, 20212035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, T.J. and Goldberg, E.D. (1960) On the marine geochemistry of barium. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 20, 192198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordfunke, E.H.P., Konings, R.J.M. and Ouweltjes, W. (1990) The standard enthalpies of formation of MO(s), MCl2(s), and M2+(aq, ?) (M= Ba, Sr).. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 22, 991996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J.D., Wagman, D.D. and Medvedev, V.A. (1989) CODATA (Committee on Data for Science and Technology) key values for thermodynamics. Hemisphere Republishing Corporation, New York, 271 pp.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (1999) Geochemical modelling – A review of current capabilities and future directions. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden, SNV Report 262, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, J.W. and Collins, A.G. (1971) Solubility of barium and strontium sulfates in strong electrolyte solutions. Environmental Science & Technology, 5, 10391043.Google Scholar
DeKock, C.W. (1986) Thermodynamic properties of selected metal sulfates and their hydrates. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular 9081, 59 pp.Google Scholar
Egorov, A.M. and Titova, Z.P. (1962) Temperature dependence of solubility products of salts with polyatomic ions. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 7, 141142.Google Scholar
Felmy, A.R., Rai, D. and Amonette, J.E. (1990) The solubility of barite and celestite in sodium sulfate: evaluation of thermodynamic data. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 19, 175185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgibbon, G.C., Huber, E.J. Jr. and Holley, C.E. Jr. (1973) The enthalpy of formation of barium monoxide. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 5, 577582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, E.M. and Paytan, A. (2012) Barite in the oceanoccurrence, geochemistry and paleoceanographic applications.. Sedimentology, 59, 18171835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanor, J.S. (2000) Barite-celestite geochemistry and environments of formation. Pp. 193275 in: Sulfate Minerals (C.N. Alpers, J.L. Jambor and D.K. Nordstrom, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 40. Mineralogical Society of American, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
Helgeson, H.C. (1969) Thermodynamics of hydrothermal systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. American Journal of Science, 267, 729804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, M.V. (1981) The global biogeochemical sulphur cycle. Pp. 6178 in: Some Perspectives of the Major Biogeochemical Cycles (G.E. Likens, editor). SCOPE Report 17, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Jiang, C. (1996) Solubility and solubility constant of barium sulfate in aqueous sodium sulfate solutions between 0 and 80ºC. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 25, 105111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.H. and Sunner, S. (1963) The heats of solution and oxidation of sulfur oxide. Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 17, 19171924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M.M., Collins, I.R. and Mackay, E.J. (2008) Low sulfate seawater injection for barium sulfate scale control: A life-of-field solution to a complex challenge. The Society of Petroleum Engineering, SPE98096, 192209.Google Scholar
Kaasa, B. (1998) Prediction of pH, mineral precipitation and multiphase equilibria during oil recovery. Doctoral thesis, Institutt for Uorganisk Kjemi, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Norway, 272 pp.Google Scholar
Kastner, M. (1999) Oceanic minerals: Their origin, nature of their environment, and significance.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, Colloquium Paper 96, 380387.Google ScholarPubMed
Kelley, K.K. and King, E.G. (1961) Contributions to the data on theoretical metallurgy. XIV. Entropies of the elements and inorganic compounds. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines, B.l.etin 592, 149 pp.Google Scholar
Khodakovsky, I.L., Mishin, I.V. and Zhogina, V.V. (1966) About temperature dependence of solubility constants and some limits on the chemical composition of hydrothermal solutions. Russian Geokhimiya, 861866.Google Scholar
Latimer, W.M. (1952) The Oxidation States of the Elements and their Potentials in Aqueous Solutions, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall I.c., New York, USA, 392 pp.Google Scholar
Latimer, W.M.G., Hicks, J.F. Jr. and Schutz, P.W. (193) The heat capacities and entropies of calcium and barium sulfates from 15 to 300ºK. The entropy and free energy of sulfate ion. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1, 620624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latimer, W.M., Pitzer, K.S. and Smith, W.V. (1938) The entropies of aqueous ions. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60, 18291831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lide, D.R. (editor) (2005) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, Tables: 5-8, 5-85 and 5-86. Online version http://www.hbcpnetbase.com. Google Scholar
Mackenzie, F.T. and Andersson, A.J. (2013) The marine carbon system and ocean acidification during Phanerozoic time. Geochemical Perspectives, 2, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majzlan, J., Navrotsky, A. and Neil, J.M. (2002) Energetics of anhydrite, barite, celestine, and anglesite: A high-temperature and differential scanning calorime t ry study.. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 66, 18391850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinin, S.D., Uchameyshvili, N.Y.. and Khitarov, N.I. (1969) Application of the theory of strong electrolytes to the solubility of barite in aqueous metal chlorides under hydrothermal conditions. Geochemistry International, 6, 732741.Google Scholar
Melcher, A.C. (1910) The solubility of silver chloride, barium sulphate, and calcium sulphate at high temperature.. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 32, 5066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnin, C. and Galinier, C. (1988) The solubility of celestite and barite in electrolyte solutions and natural waters at 25ºC: a thermodynamic study. Chemical Geology, 71, 283296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, E.W. (193) Solubility relations of barium sulfate in aqueous solutions of strong electrolytes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 55, 879884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIST (National Institute of Standard and Technology) (2014) NIST Standard Reference Database 121. NIST Physical Measurement Laboratory,. U.S. Department of Commerce.. Online version: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/index.html Google Scholar
Nordstrom, D.K. and Munoz, J.L. (1994) Geochemical Thermodynamics, 2nd edition. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, USA, 493 pp.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, D.K., Plummer, L.N., Langmuir, D., Busenberg, E., May, H.M., Jones, B.F. and Parkhurst, D.L. (1990) Revised chemical equilibrium data for major water-mineral reactions and their limitations. Pp. 398413 in: Chemical Modeling in Aqueous Systems II (R.L Bassett and D. Melchior, e.i.ors). American Chemical Society Symposium Series 416, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Palandri, J.L. and Kharaka, Y.K. (2004) A compilation of rate parameters of water–mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington DC, USA, 64 pp.Google Scholar
Parker, V.B., Wagman, D.D. and Evans, W.H. (1971) Selected values of chemical thermodynamic properties. Tables for the alkaline earth elements. Institute for Materials Research, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC, USA, N.S.Technical Note 270-6, 128 pp.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, D.L. and Appelo, C.A.J. (2013) Description of Input and Examples for PHREEQC. Version 3 – A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-reaction, One-dimensional Transport , and Inverse Geochemical Calculations. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chapter A43, 497 pp. Online version: http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/ GWC_coupled/phreeqcGoogle Scholar
Raju, K. and Atkinson, G. (1988) Thermodynamics of scale mineral solubilities. 1. BaSO4(s) in H2O and aqueous NaCl. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 3, 490495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robie, R.A. and Hemingway, B.S. (1995) Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (105 Pascals) pressure and at higher temperatures. U.S. Geological Survey, B.l.etin 2131, 470 pp.Google Scholar
Robie, R.A., Hemingway, B.S. and Fisher, J.R. (1979) Thermodynamic properties of minerals and related substances at 298.15 K and 1 bar (105 Pascals) pressure and at higher temperatures. U.S. Geological Survey, B.l.etin 1452, 464 pp.Google Scholar
Scale Consult AS (2006) MultiScale. Version 8. Trondheim, Norway. http://scaleconsult.com/index.html Google Scholar
Schulien, S. (1987) High-temperature/high-pressure solubility measurements in the systems BaSO4- NaCl-H2O and SrSO4-NaCl-H2O in connection with scale studies. The Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 16264, 23246.Google Scholar
Sillén, L.G. and Martell, A.E. (1964) Stability constants of metal-ion complexes. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Special Publication No. 17, Burlington House, London, UK, 754 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, R.M. and Martell, A.E. (1976) Critical Stability Constants. Volume 4: Inorganic Complexes. Plenum Press, New York, USA, 257 pp.Google Scholar
Templeton, C.C. (1960) Solubility of barium sulfate in sodium chloride solutions from 25º to 95ºC. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 5, 514516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchameyshvili, N.Y., Malinin, S.D. and Khitarov, N.I. (1966) Solubility of barite in concentrated chloride solutions of some metals at elevated temperatures in relation to problems of the genesis of barite deposits. Geokhimiya (Geochemistry International), 10, 951963 (11931205).Google Scholar
von Allmen, K., Böttcher, M.E., Samankassou, E. and Nägler, T.F. (2010) Barium isotope fractionation in the global barium cycle: First evidence from barium minerals and precipitation experiments. Chemical Geology, 277, 7077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagman, D.D., Evans, W.H., Parker, V.B., Halow, I., Baily, S.M. and Schumm, R.H. (1968) Selected values of chemical thermodynamic properties. Institute for Basic Standards, National Bureau of Standards, Washington DC, USA, N.S.Technical Note 270-3, 264 pp.Google Scholar
Wagman, D.D., Evans, W.H., Parker, V.B., Schumm, R.H., Halow, I., Bailey, S.M., Churney, K.L. and Nuttall, R.L. (1982) The National Bureau of Standard (NBS) tables of chemical thermodynamic properties. Selected values for inorganic and C1 and C2 organic substances in SI units. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1, Supplement 2, 407 pp.Google Scholar
Wolery, T.J. and Sutton, M. (2013) Evaluation of Thermodynamic Data. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA, LLNL-TR-640133, 38 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolgemuth, K. and Broecker, W.S. (1970) Barium in sea water. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 8, 372378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, M., Todd, A.C. and Sorbie, K.S. (1994) Sulphate scale precipitation arising from seawater injection: a prediction study. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 11, 2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar