Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-97jns Total loading time: 0.412 Render date: 2021-09-26T12:50:11.556Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

A general equation for estimating Fe3+ concentrations in ferromagnesian silicates and oxides from microprobe analyses, using stoichiometric criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

G. T. R. Droop*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL

Abstract

A simple general equation is presented for estimating the Fe3+ concentrations in ferromagnesian oxide and silicate minerals from microprobe analyses. The equation has been derived using stoichiometric criteria assuming that iron is the only element present with variable valency and that oxygen is the only anion. In general, the number of Fe3+ ions per X oxygens in the mineral formula, F, is given by;

where T is the ideal number of cations per formula unit, and S is the observed cation total per X oxygens calculated assuming all iron to be Fe2+. Minerals for which this equation is appropriate include pyralspite and ugrandite garnet, aluminate spinel, magnetite, pyroxene, sapphirine and ilmenite. The equation cannot be used for minerals with cation vacancies (e.g. micas, maghemite) unless, as in the case of amphiboles, the number of ions of a subset of elements in the formula can be fixed. Variants of the above equation are presented for some of the numerous published schemes for the recalculation of amphibole formulae. The equation is also inappropriate for minerals showing Si4+ = 4H+ substitution (e.g. staurolite, hydrogarnet), minerals containing an unknown proportion of an unanalysed element other than oxygen (e.g. boron-bearing kornerupine) and minerals containing two or more elements with variable valency.

Type
Mineralogy
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A.T. (1968) Oxidation of the La Blache Lake titaniferous magnetite deposit, Quebec. J. Geol. 76, 528-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E.H., and Bradshaw, J.Y. (1979) Phase relations of pyroxene and amphibole in greenstone, blueschist and eclogite of the Franciscan Complex, California. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 71, 67-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, I.S.E. (1967) The iron-titanium oxides of salic volcanic rocks and their associated ferromagnesian silicates. Ibid. 14, 36-64.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.A. (1979) Ompharefs from Greece, Turkey and Guatemala: composition limits of cation ordering. Am. Mineral. 64, 102-8.Google Scholar
Cawthorn, R.G., and Collerson, K.D. (1974) The recalculation of pyroxene end-member parameters and the estimation of ferrous and ferric iron content from electron microprobe analyses. Ibid. 59, 1203-8.Google Scholar
Essene, E.J., and Fyfe, W.S. (1967) Ompharef in Californian metamorphic rocks. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 15, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J.B., Ribbe, P.H., and Herd, R.K. (1979) Sapphirine. I: Crystal chemical contributions. Ibid. 68, 349-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsley, D.A. (1983) Pyroxene thermometry. Am. Mineral. 68, 477-93.Google Scholar
Meagher, E.P. (1982) Silicate garnets. In Reviews in Mineralogy,5 0rthosilicates(P. H. Ribbe, ed.) 25-66. Mineral. Soc. America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papike, J.J., Cameron, K.L., and Baldwin, K. (1974) Amphiboles and pyroxenes: characterisation of other than quadrilateral components and estimates of ferric iron from microprobe data. G.S.A. Abstracts with Programs, 6,1035-5. (abs.)Google Scholar
Richardson, S.W. (1968) Staurolite stability in a part of the system Fe A1 Si-O-H. J. Petrol. 9, 467-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rick wood, P.C. (1968) On recasting analyses of garnet into end-member molecules. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 18, 17598.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1980) The composition space of terrestrial pyroxenes—-internal and external limits. In Reviews in Mineralogy, 7 Pyroxenes(C. T. Prewitt, ed.) 419-94. Mineral. Soc. America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear, F.S., Schumacher, J.C., Laird, J., Klein, C., Evans, B.W., and Doolan, B.L. (1982) Phase relations of metamorphic amphiboles: natural occurrence and theory. Ibid. 9B Amphiboles: Petrology and experimental phase relations(D. R. Veblen and P. H. Ribbe, eds.) 1-227.Google Scholar
Stout, J.H. (1972) Phase petrology and mineral chemistry of coexisting amphiboles from Telemark, Norway. J. Petrol. 13, 99-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A.J.R. (1964) Clinopyroxenes from eclogites and basic granulites. Am. Mineral. 49, 883-8.Google Scholar
Yoder, H.S. and Tilley, C.E. (1962) Origin of basalt magmas: an experimental study of natural and synthetic rock systems. J. Petrol. 3, 342-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1072
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A general equation for estimating Fe3+ concentrations in ferromagnesian silicates and oxides from microprobe analyses, using stoichiometric criteria
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

A general equation for estimating Fe3+ concentrations in ferromagnesian silicates and oxides from microprobe analyses, using stoichiometric criteria
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

A general equation for estimating Fe3+ concentrations in ferromagnesian silicates and oxides from microprobe analyses, using stoichiometric criteria
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *