Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-8dvf2 Total loading time: 0.442 Render date: 2022-10-06T02:36:51.373Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Chemical and textural interpretation of late-stage coffinite and brannerite from the Olympic Dam IOCG-Ag-U deposit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2018

Edeltraud Macmillan*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia BHP Billiton Olympic Dam, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
Nigel J. Cook
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
Kathy Ehrig
Affiliation:
BHP Billiton Olympic Dam, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
Allan Pring
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia

Abstract

The Olympic Dam iron-oxide copper-gold-silver-uranium deposit, South Australia, contains three dominant U minerals: uraninite; coffinite; and brannerite. Microanalytical and petrographic observations provide evidence for an interpretation in which brannerite and coffinite essentially represent the products of U mineralizing events after initial deposit formation at 1.6 Ga. Marked compositional and textural differences between the various types of brannerite and coffinite highlight the role of multiple stages of U dissolution and reprecipitation.

On the basis of petrography (size, habit, textures and mineral associations) and compositional variation, brannerites are divided into four distinct groups (brannerite-A, -B, -C and -D), and coffinite into three groups (coffinite-A, -B and -C). Brannerite-A ranges in composition from what is effectively uraniferous rutile to stoichiometric brannerite, and has elevated (Mg +Mn + Na + K) and (Fe + Al) compared to other brannerite types. It displays the most diverse range of morphologies, including complex irregular-shaped aggregates, replacement bands, and discrete elongate seams. The internal structure of brannerite-A consists of randomly-oriented hair-like needles and blades. Brannerite-B (>5 μm in size) is generally prismatic and typically associated with baryte and REY minerals (REE+Y= REY). Brannerite-C and -D are both associated with Cu-(Fe)-sulfides and are typically composed of irregular masses and blebs (10–50 μm in size) with a more uniform or massive internal structure. Brannerite-D is distinct from -C and always contains inclusions of galena. Brannerite-B to -D all contain elevated ΣREY, with brannerite-B and -C having elevated As, and brannerite-D having elevated Nb.

All coffinite is typically globular (each globule is 2–10 μm in size) to collomorphic in appearance. Coffinite-A ranges from discrete globules to collomorphic bands completely encompassing quartz. Coffinite-B is always found with uraninite, and includes collomorph coffinite enveloped by massive uraninite, as well as aureoles of coffinite on the margins of uraninite crystals. Coffinite-C is associated with brannerite and REY minerals. The majority of coffinite is heterogeneous.

Brannerite and coffinite have probably precipitated as part of a late-stage hydrothermal U-event, which might have involved the dissolution and/or reprecipitation of earlier precipitated uraninite, or could represent the products of a later U mineralizing event. Evidence which supports formation of late-stage coffinite and brannerite includes: (1) low-Pb contents of both minerals; (2) coffinite is commonly found on the edges of uraninite, implying later deposition; and (3) coffinite is often found on the edge of brannerite aggregates, suggestive of brannerite precipitation occurred before coffinite. Moreover, there are many features (e.g. banding, scalloped edges, alteration rinds, variable compositions etc.) indicative of hydrothermal alteration processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S.S., Curtis, H.S. and Hafen, P.L. (1974) Alteration of detrital magnetite-ilmenite in continental sandstones of the Morrison Formation, New Mexico. Pp. 219253. In: Formation of Uranium Deposits. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Alexandre, P. and Kyser, T.K. (2005) Effects of cationic substitutions and alteration in uraninite, and implications for the dating of uranium deposits. The Canadian Mineralogist, 43, 10051017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavier, N., Szenknect, S., Costin, D.T., Mesbah, A., Poinssot, C. and Dacheux, N. (2014) From thorite to coffinite: A spectroscopic study of Th1-xUxSiO4 solid solutions. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 118, 302307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlkamp, F.J. (1978) Classification of uranium deposits. Mineralium Deposita, 13, 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R.V., Kennedy, J., McIlroy, R.W., Spence, R. and Hill, K.M. (1964) Extraction of uranium from sea water. Nature, 203, 11101115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deditius, A.P., Utsunomiya, S. and Ewing, R.C. (2008) The chemical stability of coffinite, USiO4·nH2O; 0 > n > 2, associated with organic matter: A case study from Grants uranium region, New Mexico, USA. Chemical Geology, 251, 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deditius, A.P., Utsunomiya, S., Wall, M.A., Pointeau, V. and Ewing, R.C. (2009) Crystal chemistry and radiation-induced amorphization of P-coffinite from the natural fission reactor at Bangombé, Gabon. American Mineralogist, 94, 827837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, J.J. (2014) Probe for EPMA: Acquistion, automation and analysis. Ver. 10.3.5 Xtreme Edition, Probe Software, Inc., Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
Drake, M.J. andWeill, D.F. (1972) New rare earth element standards for electron microprobe analysis. Chemical Geology, 10, 179181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrig, K., McPhie, J. and Kamenetsky, V. (2012) Geology and mineralogical zonation of the Olympic Dam Iron Oxide Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, South Australia. Pp. 237267 in: Geology and Genesis of Major Copper Deposits Society of Economic Geologists, Publication Number 16.Google Scholar
Fayek, M., Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C. (1997) Mineral chemistry and oxygen isotopic analyses of uraninite, pitchblende and uranium alteration minerals from the Cigar Lake Deposit, Saskatchewan, Canada. Applied Geochemistry, 12, 549565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C.S. and Ruud, C.O. (1971) Brannerite: its occurrences and recognition by microprobe. Colorado School of Mines Quarterly, 66, 135.Google Scholar
Finch, R.J. and Hanchar, J.M. (2003) Structure and chemistry of zircon and zircon group minerals. Pp. 126 in: Zircon (J.M. Hanchar and P.W.O. Hoskin, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 53. Mineralogical Society of America and the Geochemical Society, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, R.J. and Murakami, T. (1999) Systematics and paragenesis of uranium minerals. 38, Pp. 91179. In: Uranium: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and the Environment (P.C. Burns and R.J. Finch, editor). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnie, K.S., Zhang, Z., Vance, E.R. and Carter, M.L. (2003) Examination of U valence states in the brannerite structure by near-infrared diffuse reflectance and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopies. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 317, 4653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, H.J. (2006) Composition and origin of intermediate solid solutions in the system thorite–xenotime– zircon–coffinite. Lithos, 88, 3555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frondel, C. (1958) Systematic Mineralogy of Uranium and Thorium. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin.Google Scholar
Fuchs, L.H. and Gebert, E. (1958) X-ray studies of synthetic coffinite, thorite and uranothorites. American Mineralogist, 43, 243248.Google Scholar
Gaines, R.V., Skinner, H.C.W., Foord, E.E., Mason, B., Rosenzweig, A., King, V.T. and Dowty, E. (1997) Dana's New Mineralogy, 8th edition, Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Geisler, T., Pöml, P., Stephan, T., Janssen, A. and Putnis, A. (2005) Experimental observation of an interfacecontrolled pseudomorphic replacement reaction in a natural crystalline pyrochlore. American Mineralogist, 90, 16831687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, M.B., Hemingway, B.S., Mohagheghi, A., Reynolds, R.L. and Northrop, H.R. (1987) Origin of coffinite in sedimentary rocks by a sequential adsorption-reduction mechanism. Bulletin de Mineralogie, 110, 131144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandstaff, D.E. (1976) A kinetic study of the dissolution of uraninite. Economic Geology, 71, 14931506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M.J., Wilde, A.R. and Jones, P.A. (2005) Uranium deposits of the Mount Isa region and their relationship to deformation, metamorphism, and copper deposition. Economic Geology, 100, 537546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, J.W. (1959) The decomposition of ilmenite. Economic Geology, 54, 13151316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Y. (2003) Automated scanning electron microscope based mineral liberation analysis: an introduction to JKMRC/FEI Mineral Liberation Analyser. Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterisation & Engineering, 2, 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X., Szenknect, S., Mesbah, A., Labs, S., Clavier, N., Poinssot, C., Ushakov, S.V., Curtius, H., Bosbach, D., Ewing, R.C. et al. (2015) Thermodynamics of formation of coffinite, USiO4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 65516555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansley, P.L. and Fitzpatrick, J.J. (1989) Composition and crystallographic data on REE-bearing coffinite from the Grants uranium region, northwestern NewMexico. American Mineralogist, 74, 263270.Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Ewing, R.C. and Sverjensky, D.A. (2009) Evolution of uranium and thorium minerals. American Mineralogist, 94, 12931311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C. (1992) Coffinitization - a mechanism for the alteration of UO2 under reducing conditions. Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, 257, 497504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C. (1995) Mechanisms of lead release from uraninite in the natural fission reactors in Gabon. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 19171931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C. (1996) Phosphatian coffinite with rare earth elements and Ce-rich francoisite-(Nd) from sandstone beneath a natural fission reactor at Bangombe, Gabon. Mineralogical Magazine, 60, 665669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, A., Putnis, A., Geisler, T. and Putnis, C.V. (2010) The experimental replacement of ilmenite by rutile in HCl solutions. Mineralogical Magazine, 74, 633644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K.A. and Ewing, R.C. (1998) Petrography and chemistry of uraninites and uraninite alteration phases from the uranium mineral deposits at Bangombé. Pp. 139159 in: Proceedings 1st Annual Progress Meeting of the OKLO-Natural Analogue Phase II Project (D. Louvat and C. Davies, editors). Sitges, Spain.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.P. (1993) The geochronology and radiogenic isotope systematics of the Olympic Dam Copper-Uranium-Gold-Silver deposit, South Australia. Unpublished PhD thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Keppler, H. and Wyllie, P.J. (1990) Role of fluids in transport and fractionation of uranium and thorium in magmatic provinces. Nature, 348, 531533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchenbaur, M., Maas, R., Ehrig, K., Kamenetsky, V.S., Strub, E., Ballhaus, C. and Münker, C. (2016) Uranium and Sm isotope studies of the supergiant Olympic Dam Cu-Au-U-Ag deposit, South Australia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 180, 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komninou, A. and Sverjensky, D.A. (1996) Geochemical modeling of the formation of an unconformity-type uranium deposit. Economic Geology, 91, 590606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontonikas-Charos, A., Ciobanu, C.L., Cook, N.J., Ehrig, K., Krneta, S. and Kamenetsky, V.S. (2017) Feldspar evolution in the Roxby Downs Granite, host to Feoxide Cu-Au-(U) mineralisation at Olympic Dam, South Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 80, 838859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzer, T.G. and Kyser, T.K. (1993) O , U, and Pb isotopic and chemical variations in uraninite: Implications for determining the temporal and fluid history of ancient terrains. American Mineralogist, 78, 12621274.Google Scholar
Leroy, J.L. and Turpin, L. (1988) REE,, Th and U behaviour during hydrothermal and supergene processes in a granitic environment. Chemical Geology, 68, 239251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, K.R. and Cooper, J.A. (1984) Geochronology of Precambrian granites and associated U-Ti-Th mineralization, northern Olary province, South Australia. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 86, 298308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, K.R. and Grauch, R.I. (1980) Coexisting coffinite and uraninite in some sandstone-host uranium ores of Wyoming. Economic Geology, 75, 296302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumpkin, G.R., Leung, S.H.F. and Ferenczy, J. (2012) Chemistry, microstructure, and alpha decay damage of natural brannerite. Chemical Geology, 291, 5568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumpkin, G.R., Gao, Y., Gieré, R., Williams, C.T., Mariano, A.N. and Geisler, T. (2014) The role of Th- U minerals in assessing the performance of nuclear waste forms. MineralogicalMagazine, 78, 10711095.Google Scholar
Lynd, L.E. (1960) Alteration of ilmenite. Economic Geology, 55, 10641068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, E., Cook, N.J., Ehrig, K., Ciobanu, C.L. and Pring, A. (2016) Uraninite from the Olympic Dam IOCG-U-Ag deposit: linking textural and compositional variation to temporal evolution. American Mineralogist, 101, 12951320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, N. and Einaudi, M.T. (1990) Origin of rare earth element-enriched hematite breccias at the Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, Roxby Downs, South Australia. Economic Geology, 85, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, N. and Einaudi, M.T. (1992) Origin of hydrothermal fluids at Olympic Dam: Preliminary results from fluid inclusions and stable isotopes. Economic Geology, 87, 6490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pabst, A. (1954) Brannerite from California. American Mineralogist, 39, 109117.Google Scholar
Parks, G.A. and Pohl, D.C. (1988) Hydrothermal solubility of uraninite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 52, 863875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, J.A., Simpson, P.R., Smith, B. and Windley, B.F. (1999) Uranium ore deposits - products of the radioactive earth. Pp. 255319 in: Uranium: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and the Environment (P.C. Burns and R.J. Finch, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Vol. 38. Mineralogical Society of America and the Geochemical Society, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pointer, C.M., Ashworth, J.R. and Ixer, R.A. (1988) The zircon-thorite mineral group in metasomatized granite, Ririwai, Nigeria 1. Geochemistry and metastable solid solution of thorite and coffinite. Mineralogy and Petrology, 38, 245262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnis, A. (2002) Mineral replacement reactions: from macroscopic observations to microscopic mechanisms. Mineralogical Magazine, 66, 689708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramdohr, P. (1957) Die “Pronto-Reaktion”. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Monatshefte, 1011, 217222.Google Scholar
Reeve, J.S., Cross, K.C., Smith, R.N. and Oreskes, N. (1990) The Olympic Dam copper-uranium-gold-silver deposit, South Australia. Pp. 10091035 in: Geology of Mineral Deposits of Australia and Papua New Guniea (F.E. Hughes, editors). Australian Institute of Mining & Metallurgy Monograph 14. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Robit-Pointeau, V., Poinssot, C., Vitorge, P., Grambow, B., Cui, D., Spahiu, K. and Catalette, H. (2006) Assessment of the relevance of coffinite formation within the near-field environment of spent nuclear fuel geological disposals. Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings, 932, 489496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruh, R. andWadsley, A.D. (1966) The crystal structure of ThTi2O6 (brannerite). Acta Crystallographica, 21, 974978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A.J. (1998) Ernest-Henry Copper-Gold Deposit. Pp. 759768 in: Geology of Australian and Papua New Guinean Mineral Deposits (D.A. Berkman and D.E. Mackenzie, editors). Monograph 22. Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
Saager, R. and Stupp, H.D. (1983) U−Ti phases from Precambrian quartz-pebble conglomerates of the Elliot Lake area, Canada, and the Pongola basin, South Africa. Tschermaks Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen, 32, 83102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattonnay, G., Ardois, C., Corbel, C., Lucchini, J.F., Barthe, M.F., Garrido, F. and Gosset D. (2001) Alpharadiolysis effects on UO2 alteration in water. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 288, 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savary, V. and Pagel, M. (1997) The effects of water radiolysis on local redox conditions in the Oklo, Gabon, natural fission reactors 10 and 16. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 61, 44794494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schidlowski, M. (1966) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der radioaktiven Bestandteile der Witwatersrand Konglomerate. II. Brannerit und “Uranpecherzgeister”. Neus Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Abhandlungen, 105, 310324.Google Scholar
Singh, K.D.P., Bhargava, L.R., Ali, M.A. and Swarnkar, B.M. (1990) An unusual brannerite from Tai, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Exploration and Research for Atomic Minerals, 1, 117122.Google Scholar
Smith, D.K. (1984) Uranium mineralogy. Pp. 4388 in: Uranium Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Geology, Exploration and Resources (De Vivo, B., Ippolito, F., Capaldi, G. and Simpson, P.R., editor). The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, EnglandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, G. (1989) (U,Th)-bearing silicates in reefs of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. The Canadian Mineralogist, 27, 643656.Google Scholar
Speer, J.A. (1980) The actinide orthosilicates. Pp. 113135 in: Orthosilicates (R.G. Burns, editor). Reviews in Mineralogy 5. Geological Society of America, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Stieff, L.R., Stern, T.W. and Sherwood, A.M. (1956) Coffinite, a uranous silicate with hydroxyl substitution: a new mineral. American Mineralogist, 41, 675688.Google Scholar
Szymanski, J.T. and Scott, J.D. (1982) A crystal structure refinement of synthetic brannerite UTi2O6 and its bearing on rate of alkaline-carbonate leaching of brannerite in ore. The Canadian Mineralogist, 20, 271280.Google Scholar
Trueman, N.A., J.V.P., Long, S.J.B., Reed and Chinner, G. A. (1986) The lead-uranium systematics, and rareearth-element distributions of some Olympic Dam and Stuart Shelf mineralisation. Internal Report, Western Mining Corporation, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Vance, E.R., Watson, J.N., Carter, M.L., Day, R.A. and Begg, B.D. (2001) Crystal chemistry and stabilization in air of brannerite, UTi2O6. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 84, 141144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, E.R., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Gregg, D.J., McLeod, T. and Jovanovic, M. (2015) Solid solutions of higher valence actinides in TiO2 and ZrO2–Y2O3. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 462, 268272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A.W.G. (1954) The radioactive minerals of South Australia and their petrogenetic significance. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 2, 2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yermolayev, N.P. (1971) Processes of redistribution and extraction of uranium in progressive metamorphism. Geochemistry International, 8, 599609.Google Scholar
30
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Chemical and textural interpretation of late-stage coffinite and brannerite from the Olympic Dam IOCG-Ag-U deposit
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Chemical and textural interpretation of late-stage coffinite and brannerite from the Olympic Dam IOCG-Ag-U deposit
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Chemical and textural interpretation of late-stage coffinite and brannerite from the Olympic Dam IOCG-Ag-U deposit
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *