Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T21:41:57.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural Analysis of Proteins on Lipid Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Elizabeth M. Wilson-Kubalek*
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute La Jolla, CA92037, USA
Get access

Extract

Electron microscopy (EM) has become an increasingly powerful method for the determination of three-dimensional (3D) structures of proteins and macromolecular complexes. EM offers advantages over X-ray crystallography and NMR for obtaining structural information about proteins in physiological conditions, as components of large assemblies, that cannot be obtained in large quantity, or that fail to yield 3D crystals. EM has been used to obtain structural data from images of isolated molecules and molecular complexes, two-dimensional (2D) protein crystals, and helical protein arrays. Helically arranged proteins allow the most rapid determination of 3D maps because they contain a complete range of equally spaced molecular views, therefore no tilting of the sample with respect to the electron beam is required. However, so far 3D structure determination of helical assemblies has been limited to proteins that naturally adopt this organization and to proteins that fortuitously crystallize as helices.

Type
Structural Analysis of Proteins on Lipid Substrates
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Jap, B. K. et al, (1992) Ultramicroscopy 46: 4584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Chui, W. et al, (1997) Adv. Biophysics 34: 161172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kubalek, E.W. et al, (1994) J. Struct. Biol 113: 117123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Celia, H. et al, (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 56345639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Wilson-Kubalek, E. M. et al, (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 80408045CrossRefGoogle Scholar