Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T13:25:42.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solving Peak Overlaps for Proximity Histogram Analysis of Complex Interfaces for Atom Probe Tomography Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

Jens Keutgen ,
Andrew J. London  and
Oana Cojocaru-Mirédin
Jens Keutgen
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen, I. Physikalisches Institut (1A), Aachen, Germany
Andrew J. London
Affiliation:
UK Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Science Centre, OxfordshireOX14 3DB, UK
Oana Cojocaru-Mirédin*
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen, I. Physikalisches Institut (1A), Aachen, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence: Oana Cojocaru-Mirédin, E-mail: cojocaru-miredin@physik.rwth-aachen.de
Get access

Abstract

Atom probe tomography is a powerful tool for investigating nanostructures such as interfaces and nanoparticles in material science. Advanced analysis tools are particularly useful for analyzing these nanostructures characterized very often by curved shapes. However, these tools are very limited for complex materials with non-negligible peak overlaps in their respective mass-to-charge ratio spectra. Usually, an analyst solves peak overlaps in the bulk regions, but the behavior at interfaces is rarely considered. Therefore, in this work, we demonstrate how the proximity histogram generated for a specific interface can be corrected by using the natural abundances of isotopes. This leads to overlap-solved proximity histograms with a resolution of up to 0.1 nm. This work expands on previous work that showed the advantage of a maximum-likelihood peak overlap solving. The corrected proximity histograms together with the maximum-likelihood peak overlap algorithm were implemented in a user-friendly software suite called EPOSA.

Keywords

atom probe tomographyinterfaces
Type
Materials Science Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 28 - 35
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baerentzen, JA & Aanaes, H (2005). Signed distance computation using the angle weighted pseudonormal. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 11, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, DJ, Hornbuckle, BC, Darling, KA & Thompson, GB (2019). The influence of isoconcentration surface selection in quantitative outputs from proximity histograms. Microsc Microanal 25, 401–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blum, TB, Darling, JR, Kelly, TF, Larson, DJ, Moser, DE, Perez-Huerta, A, Prosa, TJ, Reddy, SM, Reinhard, DA, Saxey, DW, Ulfig, RM & Valley, JW (2017). Best practices for reporting atom probe analysis of geological materials. In Microstructural Geochronology: Planetary Records Down to Atom Scale, Moser, DE, Corfu, F, Darling, JR, Reddy, SM & Tait, K (Eds.), pp. 369–373. Hoboken, New Jersey (USA): Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Y, Cojocaru-Mirédin, O, Keutgen, J, Yu, Y, Küpers, M, Schumacher, M, Golub, P, Raty, J, Dronskowski, R & Wuttig, M (2019). Understanding the structure and properties of sesqui-chalcogenides (i.e., V2 VI3 or Pn2 Ch3 (Pn=pnictogen, Ch=chalcogen) compounds) from a bonding perspective. Adv Mater 31, 1904316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cojocaru-Mirédin, O, Choi, P, Wuerz, R & Raabe, D (2011). Atomic-scale characterization of the CdS/CuInSe2 interface in thin-film solar cells. Appl Phys Lett. 98, 103504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, D, Choi, P & Raabe, D (2015). Guided mass spectrum labelling in atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 159, 338–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellman, OC, Du Rivage, JB & Seidman, DN (2003). Efficient sampling for three-dimensional atom probe microscopy data. Ultramicroscopy 95, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornbuckle, BC, Kapoor, M & Thompson, GB (2015). A procedure to create isoconcentration surfaces in low-chemical-partitioning, high-solute alloys. Ultramicroscopy 159, 346–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, LJS, Thuvander, M, Stiller, K, Odén, M & Hultman, L (2013). Blind deconvolution of time-of-flight mass spectra from atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 132, 60–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MW (1995). 3D Distance from a Point to a Triangle. Department of Computer Science, University of Wales Swansea Technical Report CSR-5.Google Scholar
Kelly, TF (2011). Kinetic-energy discrimination for atom probe tomography. Microsc Microanal 17, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, TF & Larson, DJ (2012). Atom probe tomography 2012. Annu Rev Mater Res 42, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, DJ, Prosa, TJ, Ulfig, RM, Geiser, BP & Kelly, TF (2013). Local Electrode Atom Probe Tomography. New York, NY: Springer New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, CL, Hanson, RJ & Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1995). Solving Least Squares Problems. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W, Hao, T, Gao, R, Wang, X, Zhang, T, Fang, Q & Liu, C (2017). The effect of Zr, Ti addition on the particle size and microstructure evolution of yttria nanoparticle in ODS steel. Powder Technol 319, 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, AJ (2019). Quantifying uncertainty from mass-peak overlaps in atom probe microscopy. Microsc Microanal 25, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, AJ, Haley, D & Moody, MP (2017). Single-ion deconvolution of mass peak overlaps for atom probe microscopy. Microsc Microanal 23, 300–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, AJ (n.d.). APTTools download | SourceForge.net. Available at: https://sourceforge.net/projects/apttools/ (accessed April 23, 2020).Google Scholar
London, AJ, Santra, S, Amirthapandian, S, Panigrahi, BK, Sarguna, RM, Balaji, S, Vijay, R, Sundar, CS, Lozano-Perez, S & Grovenor, CRM (2015). Effect of Ti and Cr on dispersion, structure and composition of oxide nano-particles in model ODS alloys. Acta Mater 97, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, L, Amirifar, N, Shinde, D, Blum, I, Gilbert, M, Vella, A, Vurpillot, F, Lefebvre, W, Lardé, R, Talbot, E, Pareige, P, Portier, X, Ziani, A, Davesnne, C, Durand, C, Eymery, J, Butté, R, Carlin, JF, Grandjean, N & Rigutti, L (2014). Composition of wide bandgap semiconductor materials and nanostructures measured by atom probe tomography and its dependence on the surface electric field. J Phys Chem C 118, 24136–24151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, TL, Radecka, A, Sun, L, Simm, T, Dye, D, Perkins, K, Gault, B, Moody, MP & Bagot, PAJ (2016). Insights into microstructural interfaces in aerospace alloys characterised by atom probe tomography. Mater Sci Technol 32, 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maus, M, Cotlet, M, Hofkens, J, Gensch, T, De Schryver, FC, Schaffer, J & Seidel, CAM (2001). An Experimental Comparison of the Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Nonlinear Least-Squares Fluorescence Lifetime Analysis of Single Molecules. Available at: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac000877g (accessed October 1, 2019).Google Scholar
Müller, EW, Panitz, JA & McLane, SB (1968). The atom-probe field ion microscope. Rev Sci Instrum 39, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, K, Prosa, TJ, Fu, J, Kelly, TF & Subramaniam, S (2012). Chemical mapping of mammalian cells by atom probe tomography. J Struct Biol 178, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodenkirchen, C, Cagnoni, M, Jakobs, S, Cheng, Y, Keutgen, J, Yu, Y, Wuttig, M & Cojocaru-Mirédin, O (2020). Employing interfaces with metavalently bonded materials for phonon scattering and control of the thermal conductivity in TAGS- x thermoelectric materials. Adv Funct Mater 30, 1910039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soni, P, Cojocaru-Miredin, O & Raabe, D (2015). Interface engineering and nanoscale characterization of Zn(S,O) alternative buffer layer for CIGS thin film solar cells. In 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, PVSC 2015. New Orleans (USA): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.Google Scholar
Soni, P, Raghuwanshi, M, Wuerz, R, Berghoff, B, Knoch, J, Raabe, D & Cojocaru-Mirédin, O (2019). Sputtering as a viable route for In2S3 buffer layer deposition in high efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. Energy Sci Eng 7, 478–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, L, Simm, TH, Martin, TL, McAdam, S, Galvin, DR, Perkins, KM, Bagot, PAJ, Moody, MP, Ooi, SW, Hill, P, Rawson, MJ & Bhadeshia, HKDH (2018). A novel ultra-high strength maraging steel with balanced ductility and creep resistance achieved by nanoscale β-NiAl and laves phase precipitates. Acta Mater 149, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, J, Kawakami, K & Kobayashi, Y (2011). Quantitative analysis of carbon content in cementite in steel by atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 111, 1233–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, KE, Noebe, RD, Hellman, OC & Seidman, DN (2004). Dependence of interfacial excess on the threshold value of the isoconcentration surface. Surf Interface Anal 36, 594–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, M, Cojocaru-Mirédin, O, Mio, AM, Keutgen, J, Küpers, M, Yu, Y, Cho, J-Y, Dronskowski, R & Wuttig, M (2018). Unique bond breaking in crystalline phase change materials and the quest for metavalent bonding. Adv Mater 30 , 1706735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Keutgen et al. Supplementary Materials

Keutgen et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Keutgen et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 1 MB