Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:03:29.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proposal: Let's Develop a Community Consensus K-ratio Database

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2020

Nicholas Ritchie ,
Dale Newbury ,
Emma Bullock ,
Paul Carpenter ,
John Donovan ,
John Fournelle ,
Anette von der Handt ,
Heather Lowers ,
Aurélien Moy  and
Owen Neill
...Show all authors
Nicholas Ritchie
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
Dale Newbury
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
Emma Bullock
Affiliation:
Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Paul Carpenter
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
John Donovan
Affiliation:
University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States
John Fournelle
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Anette von der Handt
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Heather Lowers
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, DENVER, Colorado, United States
Aurélien Moy
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Owen Neill
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Edward Vicenzi
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, Maryland, United States

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Advances in Quantitative Electron Beam Microanalysis (EDS and WDS)
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 26 , Supplement S2 , August 2020 , pp. 1774 - 1776
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2020

References

BIPM, IEC, ILAC IFCC, IUPAC ISO, and OIML IUPAP. (2011) “Evaluation of measurement data—Supplement 2 to the ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’—Extension to any number of output quantities.” JCGM 102 (2011).Google Scholar
Nagel, D. (1968). Absorption edge effects in electron probe microanalysis. In Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis, Heinrich, K.F.J (Ed.), vol. 298, pp. 189–196. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards Special Publication.Google Scholar
Fischer, D. W. and Baun, W. L. (1967) “Self-Absorption Effects in the Soft X-Ray Mα and Mβ Emission Spectra of the Rare Earth Elements” J. Appl Physics. 38 4830-4836.10.1063/1.1709229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopon, P., Fournelle, J., Sobol, P. & Llovet, X. (2013). Low-voltage electron-probe microanalysis of Fe-Si compounds using soft X-rays. Microsc Microanal 19, 1698–1708.10.1017/S1431927613012695CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llovet, X., Pinard, P.T., Heikinheimo, E. and Richter, S. (2016) Electron Probe Microanalysis of Ni Silicides Using Ni-L X-Ray Lines, Microsc. Microanal. 22, 1233–124310.1017/S1431927616011831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastin, G.F., Heijligers, H.J.M. (1991) Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis of Ultra-Light Elements (Boron-Oxygen). In: Heinrich, K.F.J., Newbury, D.E. (eds) Electron Probe Quantitation. Springer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar