Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T01:40:44.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of the Image Contrast in an Ultra-Low Voltage Scanning Electron Microscope Using an Auger Electron Spectrometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2019

Yusuke Sakuda
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 3-1-2, Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo196-8558, Japan Yamagata University, 1-4-12, Kojirakawamachi, Yamagata990-0021, Japan
Shunsuke Asahina*
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 3-1-2, Musashino, Akishima, Tokyo196-8558, Japan
Takanari Togashi
Affiliation:
Yamagata University, 1-4-12, Kojirakawamachi, Yamagata990-0021, Japan
Osamu Terasaki
Affiliation:
Shanghai Tech University, 393 Middle Huaxia Road, Pudong, Shanghai201210, China
Masato Kurihara
Affiliation:
Yamagata University, 1-4-12, Kojirakawamachi, Yamagata990-0021, Japan
*
*Author for correspondence: Shunsuke Asahina, E-mail: sasahina@jeol.co.jp
Get access

Abstract

Surface-sensitive information on a bulk sample can be obtained by using a low incident electron energy (low accelerating voltage/landing voltage) in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). However, topography and composition contrast obtained at low incident electron energies may not be intuitive and should be analyzed carefully. By combining an Auger electron spectrometer (AES) with a low incident electron energy SEM (LE-SEM), we investigated the SEM contrast carefully by separating the secondary electron (SE) and back-scattered electron (BSE) components with high accuracy. For this, we modified an AES to measure the electron energy in the range of 0–0.6 keV with a sample bias voltage of 0 to −0.3 keV. We could clearly observe reversed brightness of gold and carbon (graphite) in BSE images when the energy of the incident electrons was reduced to 0.2–0.3 keV. In addition, reflected electron energy spectroscopy (REELS) is known to be a tool for chemical state analysis of the sample. We demonstrated that it is possible to study the electron states of graphite, diamond, and graphene by acquiring low incident energy REELS spectra from their surfaces with the newly modified AES. This will be a new method for analyzing the electron states of local areas of a surface.

Type
Australian Microbeam Analysis Society Special Section AMAS XV 2019
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asahina, S, Suga, M, Takahashi, H, Jeong, HY, Galeano, C, Schuth, F & Terasaki, O (2014). Direct observation and analysis of yolk-shell materials using low-voltage high-resolution scanning electron microscopy: Nanometal-particles encapsulated in metal-oxide, carbon, and polymer. APL Mater 2, 113317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asahina, S, Takami, S, Otsuka, T, Adschiri, T & Terasaki, O (2011). Exploitation of surface sensitive electrons in scanning electron microscopy reveals the formation mechanism of new cubic and truncated octahedral CeO2 nanoparticles. ChemCatChem 3, 10381048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, E (1994). Low energy electron microscopy. Rep Prog Phys 57, 895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton, RF (2009). Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the TEM. Rep Prog Phys 72, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geim, AK & Novoselov, KS (2007). The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6, 183191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, JI, Newbury, DE, Michael, JR, Ritchie, NWM, Scott, JH & Joy, DC (2017). Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, 4th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ley, L & Cardona, M (1979). Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 27, Photoemission in Solids II. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Mullerova, I & Frank, L (1993). Very low energy microscopy in commercial SEMs. Scanning 15, 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullerova, I & Frank, L (2004). Contrast at very low energies of the gold/carbon specimen for resolution testing. Scanning 26, 1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murooka, Y, Tanaka, N, Hirono, S & Hibino, M (2002). Electron energy-loss spectroscopy of carbon films prepared by electron-cyclotron-resonance plasma sputtering. Mater Trans 43, 2094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novoselov, KS, Geim, AK, Morozov, SV, Jiang, D, Zhang, Y, Dubonos, SV, Grigorieva, IV & Firsov, AA (2004). Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, Y, Kudo, M, Yamada, T, Ikeo, N & Nagasawa, Y (1999). Chemical states analysis by Auger microprobe with hemispherical energy analyzer. J Surface Anal 5, 173175.Google Scholar
Suga, M, Asahina, S, Sakuda, Y, Kazumori, H, Nishiyama, H, Nokuo, T, Alfredsson, V, Kjellman, T, Stevens, SM, Cho, HS & Cho, M (2014). Recent progress in scanning electron microscopy for the characterization of fine structural details of nano materials. Prog Solid State Chem 42, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terasaki, O, Cho, H, Cho, M, Jeong, H, Asahina, S, Sakuda, Y, Suga, M, Kazumori, H, Kudo, M, Nokuo, T & Liu, Z (2013). Novel structural characterisations of insulating and electron beam sensitive materials employing low voltage high resolution scanning electron microscopy. JEOL News 48, 2131.Google Scholar
Wang, ZL & Cowley, JM (1988). Reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy (REELS): A technique for the study of surfaces. Surf Sci 193, 501502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, WSM (2003). Obtaining quantitative information on surface excitations from reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy (REELS). Surf Interface Anal 35, 347353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, Turner, S, Brosens, F & Verbeeck, J (2010). Model-based determination of dielectric function by STEM low-loss EELS. Phys Rev B 81, 035102035105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar