Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-pf4mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-01T05:37:19.776Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Direct Observation of Cationic Ordering in Double Perovskite Sr2FeReO6 Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2013

Si-Young Choi*
Affiliation:
Advanced Characterization and Analysis Group, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon 641-831, Republic of Korea
Jong Bong Lim
Affiliation:
Nano-Functional Materials Group, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon 641-831, Republic of Korea
Yuichi Ikuhara
Affiliation:
Institute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Danilo Suvorov
Affiliation:
Department of Advanced Materials, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana SI-1000, Slovenia
Jae-Ho Jeon
Affiliation:
Nano-Functional Materials Group, Korea Institute of Materials Science, Changwon 641-831, Republic of Korea
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: youngchoi@kims.re.kr

Abstract

Two kinds of Sr2FeReO6 (SFRO) samples, pristine SFRO and Re-excess SFRO, were prepared and we visualized the local atomic structure in terms of cationic ordering in the prepared SFRO samples via high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). HAADF-STEM results demonstrated the high degree of cationic ordering maintains in both the pristine SFRO and Re-excess SFRO samples. On the other hand, defective structures such as antiphase boundary and Re-deficient phase were observed dominantly in the pristine SFRO, and thus the poor magnetic property in the pristine SFRO is attributed to those defective structures related with the frustrated Fe/Re ordering.

Type
Materials Sciences Abstracts
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2013 

Introduction

Cation ordering double perovskites, having the typical formula A2BB′O6 where A is an alkaline earth cation and B and B′ are heterovalent transition metals, are half-metallic magnetic oxides that have been attracting a great deal of attention in the field of spin-polarized transport applications. Moreover, these double perovskites have become one of a group of promising magnetic materials for spin electronics because of their high T c, the value of which is much higher than 300 K, and their tunneling-type magnetoresistance (Kobayashi et al., Reference Kobayashi, Kimura, Sawada, Terakura and Tokura1998; Fang et al., Reference Fang, Terakura and Kanamori2001). The magnetic structure of A2BB′O6 is known to originate from the ordered arrangement of parallel Fe3+ (3d5, S = 5/2) magnetic moments, antiferromagnetically coupled with Mo5+ (4d1, S = 1/2) spins or Re5+ (5d2, S = 1) spins. These oxides present antisite (AS) defects, in which cationic ordering in B-sites is frustrated by the occupation of B cations of B′ sites and vice versa; this situation is known to remarkably degrade the magnetic saturation, as well as the magnetoresistance (Balcells et al., Reference Balcells, Navarro, Bibes, Roig, Martinez and Fontcuberta2001; García-Hernádez et al., Reference García-Hernádez, Martínez, Martínez-Loe, Casais and Alonso2001; Navarro et al., Reference Navarro, Balcells, Sandiumenge, Bibes, Roig, Martinez and Fontcuberta2001).

So far, the conventional way to determine the presence of cationic ordering such as AS defects is to utilize a statistical tool (Lindén et al., Reference Lindén, Yamamoto, Karppinen, Yamauchi and Pietari2000; Nakamura & Oikawa, Reference Nakamura and Oikawa2003; Zajac et al., Reference Zajac, Sikora, Prochazka, Borowiec, Stepien, Kapusta, Riedi, Marquina, De Teresa and Ibarra2007) such as neutron diffraction, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Mossbauer spectroscopy, but the atomic-scale observation of the local distribution of Fe/Re disordering cannot be predicted by such macroscopic analytical tools, even though the atomic-scale defective structures, such as antiphase boundary (APB) and antiferromagnetic Fe–O–Fe islands, have been suggested to diminish the magnetic property (Lindén et al., Reference Lindén, Yamamoto, Karppinen, Yamauchi and Pietari2000; Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou, Dass, Zhou, McDevitt and Goodenough2000; García-Hernádez et al., Reference García-Hernádez, Martínez, Martínez-Loe, Casais and Alonso2001; Navarro et al., Reference Navarro, Balcells, Sandiumenge, Bibes, Roig, Martinez and Fontcuberta2001). In this study, we utilized scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) with a spherical aberration corrector to visualize the cationic ordering in Sr2FeReO6 (SFRO), as the correction of aberrations in electron microscopy (Haider et al., Reference Haider, Uhlemann, Schwan, Kabius, Rose and Urban1998; Batson et al., Reference Batson, Dellby and Krivanek2002; Nellist et al., Reference Nellist, Chisholm, Dellby, Krivanek, Murfitt, Szilagyi, Lupini, Borisevich, Sides and Pennycook2004; Jia et al., Reference Jia, Mi, Urban, Vrejoiu, Alexe and Hesse2008) has allowed the resolution of images to be significantly enhanced to the subangstrom level and furthermore facilitates the observation of sensitive variations in atomic column images (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Chung, Yamamoto and Ikuhara2009; Chung et al., Reference Chung, Choi, Yamamoto and Ikuhara2009).

Methods and Materials

The pristine SFRO powder was first synthesized by the conventional solid-state method, using SrCO3, Fe2O3, and ReO3; 15 wt%-Re-excess SFRO powder was also prepared using the same starting materials, along with ReO3. The mixed powders were pressed into discs and calcined at 900°C for 3 h under Ar atmosphere. All calcined powders were charged into 10-mm-diameter graphite molds and then sintered at 1,100°C for 10 min by using spark plasma sintering (SPS-1050; Sumitomo Coal Mining) under 65 MPa of pressure in Ar atmosphere. The sintered bodies were followed by annealing in air at 700°C for 0.5 h to remove the contamination of carbon on the sample surfaces.

High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) images were recorded with an STEM (JEM-2100F, JEOL) at 200 kV with a spherical aberration corrector (CEOS GmbH), and thus the size of the electron probe was ~1.0 Å. In the HAADF imaging, a HAADF detector with an inner angle greater than ~80 mrad was used in order to allow for large-angle elastic scattering of electrons for clear Z-sensitive images. The obtained raw images were filtered to eliminate background noise using 2D difference filters (HREM Research Inc.). Image simulations based on the multislice method were performed using WinHREM (HREM Research Inc.).

Results and Discussion

Magnetization–magnetic field hysteresis loops indicated that the value of the saturated magnetization (M s) of pristine SFRO was found to deteriorate down to 14.3 emu/g, compared with Re-excess SFRO (21.4 emu/g). Moreover, the pristine SFRO sample can be saturated at a higher magnetic field and, accordingly, can exhibit a larger coercive magnetic field (H c). Lower M s and higher H c in the pristine SFRO sample reveals that the ferromagnetic alignment of Fe and Re atoms is interfered with by the Fe/Re disordering. Before an atomic-scale analysis, the pristine and Re-excess SFRO samples were analyzed with an XRD diffractometer. It was found that Fe/Re disordering structure in the pristine SFRO was determined to reach up to ~15%, whereas the Re-excess SFRO showed a much higher degree of Fe/Re ordering, with a value of <3%. Therefore, the magnetic property and the XRD results demonstrated that the magnetic saturation was diminished by the Fe/Re disordering.

For both the pristine and the Re-excess SFRO samples, the HAADF-STEM images from the [001] and [110] projections are shown in Figures 1a and 1b, respectively. Although only two atomic columns of the Fe and Re column (orange sphere) and the Sr column (green sphere) were distinguished in the [001] projection, three kinds of atomic columns of the Fe column (yellow sphere), the Re column (blue sphere), and the Sr column (green sphere) can be clearly noticed in the [110] projection, indicating that the Fe/Re ordering in SFRO can be confirmed on an atomic scale in the [110] projection. Figure 1c includes three intensity profiles of columns along from the pristine SFRO (red line), the Re-excess SFRO (blue line), and the simulated image (green symbols). Although the HAADF-STEM image simulation was carried out based on the defect-free SFRO structure and the pristine SFRO exhibits the high degree of cationic disordering (~15% from XRD result), all of the profiles have a strong resemblance, confirming that SFRO sample originally exhibits a well-ordered Fe/Re structure even in SFRO sample holding a large amount of Fe/Re disordering.

Figure 1. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images from the pristine SFRO sample perpendicular to the (a) [001] and (b) [110] crystallographic axes. The insets represent the simulated HAADF-STEM images. The atomic arrays in the SFRO are superimposed on each inset (Sr, green; Re/Fe, orange; Fe, yellow; and Re, blue). c: Intensity profiles along direction from HAADF-STEM images of the pristine (red) and Re excess (blue) through [110] projection. Green symbols indicate the intensity profile from the simulated image.

Although a well-ordered Fe/Re structure is typically observed in both samples, we can notice several defective structures associated with Fe/Re ordering, mainly in the pristine SFRO sample, which was predicted from XRD results. First, the AS defects were observed, as shown in Figure 2a, where the Fe atomic columns indicated by the red and green arrows exhibit higher intensities than that of the one indicated by the yellow arrow. Owing to the sensitivity of the HAADF-STEM image to the atomic number, the unusually strong intensity of the Fe atomic column directly indicates the occurrence of the AS defects. To quantitatively confirm the AS defects, HAADF-STEM image simulation was performed as a function of the degree of exchange between Fe and Re sites. Figures 2b–2d provide a series of simulated HAAD-STEM images in the [110] projection when the Fe–Re exchange occurs at 10, 15, and 20%, respectively. The relative intensity of the Fe atomic column indicated by the yellow arrow in Figure 2a is comparable to the one from the simulated HAADF-STEM image with 10% Fe–Re exchange (Fig. 2b). The profiling behaviors of the Fe columns indicated by the green and red arrows seem to exhibit more of AS defects as they are in a good agreement with those of the simulated cases at 15% (Fig. 2c) and 20% (Fig. 2d) Fe–Re exchanges, respectively. Second, we are able to directly confirm the APB, which supposedly hindered the movement of the magnetic domain wall in the double perovskite oxides (Yin et al., Reference Yin, Zhou, Dass, Zhou, McDevitt and Goodenough2000; Navarro et al., Reference Navarro, Balcells, Sandiumenge, Bibes, Roig, Martinez and Fontcuberta2001). APB is regarded as the boundary area at which Fe/Re ordering seems to be impeded, as can be seen in Figure 3a. Figure 3b shows the profiled intensity of the atomic column, indicated by the red rectangle in Figure 3a, and shows that the intensity profile is quite symmetric around the Sr atom indicated by the red arrow. In this APB region, the intensities of the Re columns (column #4–column #7) are found to gradually decrease along with the increased intensity of the Fe columns (blue arrows). This indicates that an APB region is correlated with the Fe/Re cationic disordering; that strong antiferromagnetic interaction of Fe–O–Fe at APB can occur; and furthermore that the magnetic spin of Fe can be inverted across the APB. Finally, we briefly mention the Re-deficient phase, which exists only in the pristine SFRO despite the low observed frequency. The Re-deficient phase appears on the right in the dark portion of Figure 4. It is most likely SrFeO3 that has retained the antiferromagnetic Fe–O–Fe order (Mathi Jaya et al., Reference Mathi Jaya, Jagadish, Rao and Asokamani1991; Falcon et al., Reference Falcon, Barbero, Alonso, Martinez-Lope and Fierro2002). The source material for Re, ReO3, is highly volatile and therefore the formation of Re-deficient phase can be inhibited by adding 15 wt% Re.

Figure 2. a: High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of the pristine SFRO and the intensity profile of the atomic columns indicated by the red rectangle. The simulated HAADF-STEM images of SFRO having (b) 10%, (c) 15%, and (d) 20% Fe/Re disordering and the intensity profiles from each image.

Figure 3. a: High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy image of Re-excess SFRO showing the atomic structure of the antiphase boundary (APB) and (b) the intensity profile along [110] direction across the APB.

Figure 4. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy image from the pristine SFRO showing the well-ordered structure of Fe/Re (left side) and Re-deficient phase (dark and right side). Inset is the enlarged image of the red square.

Conclusions

We have successfully controlled the Fe/Re ordering structure and the subsequent magnetic saturation as a function of Re source metal and elucidated a local configuration of Fe/Re ordering in AS defects and APB via the direct imaging of individual atomic columns in aberration-corrected STEM along with the HAADF-STEM image simulations. The Fe/Re ordering structure in SFRO can be directly identified through the [110] crystallographic axis, and a high degree of Fe/Re ordering was observed in both pristine and Re-excess SFRO, although AS defects were apparently observed in some of the pristine SFRO. This atomic-scale analysis suggests that the frustration of Fe/Re ordering is accompanied by the appearance of a local distribution of AS defects and APBs rather than the homogeneous distribution of AS defects in the whole area of double perovskites.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea through a grant provided by the Korean Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MEST; No. 2008-00664).

References

Balcells, L.I., Navarro, J., Bibes, M., Roig, A., Martinez, B. & Fontcuberta, J. (2001). Cationic ordering control of magnetization in Sr2FeMoO6 double perovskite. Appl Phys Lett 78(6), 781783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, P.E., Dellby, N. & Krivanek, O.L. (2002). Sub-ångstrom resolution using aberration corrected electron optics. Nature 418(6898), 617620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, S.-Y., Chung, S.-Y., Yamamoto, T. & Ikuhara, Y. (2009). Direct determination of dopant site selectivity in ordered perovskite CaCu3Ti4O12 polycrystals by aberration-corrected STEM. Adv Mater 21(8), 885889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, S.-Y., Choi, S.-Y., Yamamoto, T. & Ikuhara, Y. (2009). Orientation-dependent arrangement of antisite defects in lithium iron(II) phosphate crystals. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(3), 543546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falcon, H., Barbero, J.A., Alonso, J.A., Martinez-Lope, M.J. & Fierro, J.L.G. (2002). SrFeO3-δ perovskite oxides: Chemical features and performance for methane combustion. Chem Mater 14(5), 23252333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, Z., Terakura, K. & Kanamori, J. (2001). Strong ferromagnetism and weak antiferromagnetism in double perovskites: Sr2FeMO6 (M = Mo, W, and Re). Phys Rev B 63(18), 180407-1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Hernádez, M., Martínez, J.L., Martínez-Loe, M.J., Casais, M.T. & Alonso, J.A. (2001). Finding universal correlations between cationic disorder and low field magnetoresistance in FeMo double perovskite series. Phy Rev Lett 86(11), 24432446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, M., Uhlemann, S., Schwan, E., Kabius, B., Rose, H. & Urban, K. (1998). Electron microscopy image enhanced. Nature 392(667B), 768769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, C.L., Mi, S.-B., Urban, K., Vrejoiu, I., Alexe, M. & Hesse, D. (2008). Atomic-scale study of electric dipoles near charged and uncharged domain walls in ferroelectric films. Nat Mater 7(1), 5761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, K.I., Kimura, T., Sawada, H., Terakura, K. & Tokura, Y. (1998). Room temperature magnetoresistance in an oxide material with an ordered double-perovskite structure. Nature 395(15), 677680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindén, J., Yamamoto, T., Karppinen, M., Yamauchi, H. & Pietari, T. (2000). Evidence for valence fluctuation of Fe in Sr2FeMoO6-w double perovskite. Appl Phys Lett 76(20), 29252927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathi Jaya, S., Jagadish, R., Rao, R.S. & Asokamani, R. (1991). Electronic structure and magnetism of SrFeO3 and SrCoO3. Phys Rev B 43(16), 1327413279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, S. & Oikawa, K. (2003). Precise structure analysis consistent with Mössbauer quadrupole effect: A case of the ordered double perovskites Sr2FeMO6 (M = Mo and Re). J Phys Soc Jpn 72(12), 31233127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Balcells, L.I., Sandiumenge, F., Bibes, M., Roig, A., Martinez, B. & Fontcuberta, J. (2001). Antisite defects and magnetoresistance in Sr2FeMoO6 double perovskite. J Phys: Condens Matter 13(37), 84818488.Google Scholar
Nellist, P.D., Chisholm, M.F., Dellby, N., Krivanek, O.L., Murfitt, M.F., Szilagyi, Z.S., Lupini, A.R., Borisevich, A., Sides, W.H. Jr. & Pennycook, S.J. (2004). Direct sub-angstrom imaging of a crystal lattice. Science 305(5691), 1741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, H.Q., Zhou, J.-S., Dass, R., Zhou, J.-P., McDevitt, J.T. & Goodenough, J.B. (2000). Grain-boundary room-temperature low-field magnetoresistance in Sr2FeMoO6 films. J Appl Phys 87(9), 67616763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, D., Sikora, M., Prochazka, V., Borowiec, M., Stepien, J., Kapusta, C., Riedi, P.C., Marquina, C., De Teresa, J.M. & Ibarra, M.R. (2007). Local magnetic and electronic properties of the A2FeM′O6 (A = Ba, Sr, Ca, M′ = Mo, Re) double perovskites. Acta Physica Polonica 111(6), 797820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images from the pristine SFRO sample perpendicular to the (a) [001] and (b) [110] crystallographic axes. The insets represent the simulated HAADF-STEM images. The atomic arrays in the SFRO are superimposed on each inset (Sr, green; Re/Fe, orange; Fe, yellow; and Re, blue). c: Intensity profiles along direction from HAADF-STEM images of the pristine (red) and Re excess (blue) through [110] projection. Green symbols indicate the intensity profile from the simulated image.

Figure 1

Figure 2. a: High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of the pristine SFRO and the intensity profile of the atomic columns indicated by the red rectangle. The simulated HAADF-STEM images of SFRO having (b) 10%, (c) 15%, and (d) 20% Fe/Re disordering and the intensity profiles from each image.

Figure 2

Figure 3. a: High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy image of Re-excess SFRO showing the atomic structure of the antiphase boundary (APB) and (b) the intensity profile along [110] direction across the APB.

Figure 3

Figure 4. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy image from the pristine SFRO showing the well-ordered structure of Fe/Re (left side) and Re-deficient phase (dark and right side). Inset is the enlarged image of the red square.