Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-jbjwg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-13T22:41:32.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alterations In Glutamate Synapses In The Nucleus Accumbens Following Sensitization To Cocaine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

L. B. Kozell
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR97201
C. K. Meshul
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR97201 VA Medical Center, Portland, OR97201
Get access

Extract

Repeated intermittent administration of cocaine to rodents has been shown to result in behavioral sensitization, or enhanced locomotor activity. Because there are similarities between effects of intermittent cocaine use in humans and sensitization in rats, understanding the neural mechanism underlying sensitization may provide insights into mechanisms of psychopathologies in humans.

There is abundant evidence that the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathways, originating in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and terminating in both nucleus accumbens (NAc) and prefrontal cortex (PFC), are critically important for development of sensitization to the motor-stimulating effects of cocaine. Evidence also suggests that changes in glutamate (Glu) transmission in the mesolimbic DA pathways are associated with sensitization to cocaine. In recent collaborative studies, we have shown that cocaine administration transiently decreases the density of nerve terminal glutamate immunolabeling within the NAc shell following withdrawal from continuous or intermittent cocaine administration. Locomotor activity was not assessed in either of these studies.

Type
Highlights Of Biological Microscopy In The Pacific Northwest Usa
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Kalivas, P. W. and Stewart, J. Brain Res. Rev. (1991)223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kalivas, P. W. and Alesdatter, J. E. J P. E. T. (1993)486.Google Scholar
3.Kelly, PH. and Iversen, L. L. Psychopharm. (1975)221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Pierce, R. C. et al., J. Neuroscience (1996)1550.Google Scholar
5.Kalivas, P. W. Drug and Alcohol Dependence (1995)95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Meshul, C. K. et al., Synapse (1998)211.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Keys, A. S. et al., Synapse (1998)393.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.This research was supported by a VA Merit Review (CKM) and the PhRMA Foundation (LBK).Google Scholar