Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-p6h7k Total loading time: 0.634 Render date: 2022-05-17T00:49:56.818Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Surface Diffusion of Fe and Cu on Fe (001) Under Electric Field Using First-Principles Calculations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2019

Toshiharu Ohnuma*
Materials Science Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), 2-6-1 Nagasaka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa-ken 240-0196, Japan
Author for correspondence: Toshiharu Ohnuma, E-mail:


First-principles calculations were performed to determine the Fe on Fe (001) evaporation field and to characterize the surface diffusion of Fe and Cu on Fe (001) and on a step structure under an applied electric field. The evaporation field of Fe on Fe (001) was calculated by the nudged elastic band (NEB) method, using the combination of the effective screening medium and constant electrode potential methods to obtain a condition of constant electric field. The calculated evaporation field of Fe on Fe (001) was 32.4 V/nm, which agrees well with the experimental value. In the surface diffusion of Fe and Cu on Fe (001) and on a step structure, the activation barrier energies were determined by the NEB method with constant applied electric field. It was found that Cu diffuse more easily on the Fe (001) and step structure than Fe under an applied electric field. The activation barrier energy of surface diffusion in the saddle point configuration is small when the distance between Cu and Fe on the surface is larger, and the activation barrier energy becomes smaller when passing through a path far away from the surface due to the effect of the electric field.

Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Antczak, G & Ehrlich, G (2007). Jump processes in surface diffusion. Surf Sci Rep 62, 3961.10.1016/j.surfrep.2006.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, N, Morishita, T, Sugino, O & Otani, M. (2012). First-principles molecular dynamics at a constant electrode potentia. Phys Rev Lett 109, 266101266101-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadel, E, Vurpillot, F, Larde, R, Duguay, S & Deconihout, B. (2009). Depth resolution function of the laser assisted tomographic atom probe in the investigation of semiconductors. J Appl Phys 106, 044908044908-6.10.1063/1.3186617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feibelman, PJ. (2001). Surface-diffusion mechanism versus electric field: Pt/Pt(001). Phys Rev B64, 125403-1125403-6.Google Scholar
Gault, B, Danoix, F, Hoummadad, K, Mangelinck., D & Leitner, H (2012 a) Impact of directional walk on atom probe microanalysis. Ultramicroscopy 113, 182191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gault, B, Moody, MP, Cairney, JM & Ringer, SP (2012 b) Atom Probe Microscopy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gault, B, Moody, MP, de Geuser, F, Haley, D, Stephenson, LT & Ringer, SP (2009). Origin of the spatial resolution in atom probe microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 95, 034103-1034103-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannozzi, P, Baroni, S, Bonini, N, Calandra, M, Car, R, Cavazzoni, C, Ceresoli, D, Chiarotti, GL, Cococcioni, M, Dabo, I, Dal Corso, A, Fabris, S, Fratesi, G, de Gironcoli, S, Gebauer, R, Gerstmann, U, Gougoussis, C, Kokalj, A, Lazzeri, M, Martin-Samos, L, Marzari, N, Mauri, F, Mazzarello, R, Paolini, S, Pasquarello, A, Paulatto, L, Sbraccia, C, Scandolo, C, Sclauzero, G, Seitsonen, AP, Smogunov, A, Umari, P & Wentzcovitch, RM (2009). QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J Phys: Condens Matter 21, 395502395502-19.Google ScholarPubMed
He, Y & Che, JG. (2009). Electric-field effects on the diffusion of Si and Ge adatoms on Si(001) studied by density functional simulations. Phys Rev B79, 225430-1225430-5Google Scholar
Karahka, M & Kreuzer, HJ (2013). Field evaporation of oxides: a theoretical study. Ultramicroscopy 132, 5459.10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.10.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karahka, ML & Kreuzer, HJ (2016). New physics and chemistry in high electrostatic fields. Surf Sci 643, 164171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Y, Takahashi, J & Kawakami, K (2011). Anomalous distribution in atom map of solute carbon in steel. Ultramicroscopy 111, 600603.10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreuzer, HJ (1991). Physics and chemistry in high electric fields. (invited talk, 37th international field emission symposium, albuquerque, NM, July 30 August 3, 1990). Surface Sci 246, 336347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer, HJ & Nath, K (1987). Field evaporation. Surf Sci 183, 591608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer, HJ, Wang, LC & Lang, ND. (1992). Self-consistent calculation of atomic adsorption on metals in high electric fields. Phys Rev B 45, 1205012055.10.1103/PhysRevB.45.12050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, DJ, Prosa, TJ, Ulfig, RM, Geiser, BP & Kelly, TF (2013). Local Electrode Atom Probe Tomography. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, MK & Forbes, RG (2014). Atom-Probe Tomography: The Local Electrode Atom Probe. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-7430-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, MK & Smith, GDW. (1989). Atom Probe microanalysis: Principles and application to materials problems, Published by Materials Research Society.Google Scholar
Monkhorst, HJ & Pack, JD (1976). Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13, 5192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, MD & Seidman, DN (2011). Voltage-pulsed and Laser-pulsed atom probe tomography of a multiphase high-strength low-carbon steel. Microsc Microanal 17, 950962.10.1017/S1431927611011895CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberdorfer, C & Schmitz, G (2011). On the field evaporation behavior of dielectric materials in three-dimensional atom probe: a numeric simulation. Microsc Microanal 17, 1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ono, T & Hirose, K (2004). First-principles study on field evaporation for silicon atom on Si(001) surface. J Appl Phys 95, 15681571.10.1063/1.1636258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, T, Sasaki, T, Otsuka, J & Hirose, K (2005). First-principles study on field evaporation of surface atoms from W(0 1 1) and Mo(0 1 1) surfaces. Surf Sci 577, 4246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otani, M & Sugino, O. (2006). First-principles calculations of charged surfaces and interfaces: a plane-wave nonrepeated slab approach. Phys Rev B 73, 115407115407-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peralta, J, Broderick, SR & Rajan, K (2013). Mapping energetics of atom probe evaporation events through first principles calculations. Ultramicroscopy 132, 143151.10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.02.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perdew, P, Burke, K & Ernzerhof, M (1996). Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77, 38653868.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pseudopotentials (2006). We used the pseudopotentials Fe.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF and Cu.pbe-d-rrkjus. UPF from Scholar
Sanchez, CG, Lozovoi, AY & Alavi, A (2004). Field-evaporation from first-principles. Mol Phys 102, 10451055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengupta, D (2006). Effect of external field on bond energy and activation barrier for surface diffusion. J Cryst Growth 286, 9195.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silaeva, EP, Karahka, M & Kreuzer, HJ (2013). Atom probe tomography and field evaporation of insulators and semiconductors: Theoretical issues. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 17, 211216.10.1016/j.cossms.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchorski, Yu, Ernst, N, Schmidt, WA, Medvedev, VK, Kreuzer, HJ, & Wang, RLC (1996). Field desorption and field evaporation of metals. Progr Surf Sci 53, 135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchorski, Yu, Schmidt, WA, Block, JH & Kreuzer, HJ (1994). Comparative studies on field ionization at surface sites of Rh, Ag, and Au: differences in local electric field enhancement. Vacuum 45, 259262.10.1016/0042-207X(94)90184-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchorski, Yu, Schmidt, WA, Ernst, N, Block, JH & Kreuzer, HJ. (1995). Electrostatic fields above individual surface atoms. Prog Surf Sci 48, 121134.10.1016/0079-6816(95)93420-CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomanek, D, Kreuzer, HJ & Block, JH. (1985). Tight-binding approach to field desorption: N2 on Fe(111). Surf Sci 157, L315-L322.10.1016/0039-6028(85)90623-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsong, TT (2001). Mechanisms of surface diffusion. Prog Surf Sci 67, 235248.10.1016/S0079-6816(01)00026-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsong, TT & Kellogg, G (1975). Direct observation of the directional walk of single adatoms and the adatom polarizability. Phys Rev B 12, 13431353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukada, M, Tamura, H, McKenna, KP, Shluger, AL, Chen, YM, Ohkubo, T & Hono, K (2011). Mechanism of laser assisted field evaporation from insulating oxides. Ultramicroscopy 111, 567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vurpillot, F, Bostel, A & Blavette, D. (2000 a) Trajectory overlaps and local magnification in three-dimensional atom probe. Appl Phys Lett 76, 31273129.10.1063/1.126545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vurpillot, F, Bostel, A, Cadel, E & Blavette, D (2000 b) The spatial resolution of 3D atom probe in the investigation of single-phase materials. Ultramicroscopy 84, 213224.10.1016/S0304-3991(00)00035-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vurpillot, F, De Geuser, F, Da Costa, G & Blavete, D (2004). Application of Fourier transform and autocorrelation to cluster identification in the three-dimensional atom probe. J Microsc 216, 234240.10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01413.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, LC & Kreuzer, HJ. (1990). Kinetic theory of field evaporation of metals. Surface Sci 237, 337346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Surface Diffusion of Fe and Cu on Fe (001) Under Electric Field Using First-Principles Calculations
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Surface Diffusion of Fe and Cu on Fe (001) Under Electric Field Using First-Principles Calculations
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Surface Diffusion of Fe and Cu on Fe (001) Under Electric Field Using First-Principles Calculations
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *