Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:11:30.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogen-Induced Phase Separation of Palladium-Rhodium Alloys Using an Environmental Cell TEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D.F. Teter
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545
R.D. Field
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545
D.J. Thoma
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545
Get access

Extract

The palladium-rhodium system has been extensively studied for its hydrogen absorption characteristics. However, the phase diagram of the palladium-rhodium system has not been conclusively determined below 800 K. Shield and Williams have experimentally determined the incoherent miscibility gap in Pd-Rh alloys using electrical resistivity studies, however the coherent miscibility gap and spinodal have not been determined. Recently work by Noh and Flanagan has suggested that hydrogen enhances metal atom mobility and may increase the kinetics of phase separation in Pd-Rh alloys. Field and Thoma found that hydrogen causes a Pd-10%Rh alloy to decompose during an in situhydrogen charging experiment in an environmental cell TEM. According to the calculations by Gonis et al. of the miscibility gap for the palladium-rhodium system, the Pd-10%Rh alloy may be within the chemical spinodal at room temperature.

In this work, two palladium-rhodium compositions were investigated. The first was a Pd-10 at.% Rh alloy produced by melt-spinning, and the second was a Pd-30at.

%Rh alloy which had been arc-melted and cold rolled followed by an annealing treatment to homogenize the material. TEM specimens were prepared by punching 3 mm disks from the material.

Type
In Situ Studies in Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shield, J. E. and Williams, R. K., Scripta Met. 21, (1987) 14751479.10.1016/0036-9748(87)90286-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, H., et al., J. Alloys Comp. 196, (1993) 716.10.1016/0925-8388(93)90562-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, H., et al., Scripta Met. Mater. 25, (1991) 225230.10.1016/0956-716X(91)90385-ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, H., et al., J. Alloys Compounds 240, (1996) 235248.10.1016/0925-8388(95)02193-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, R. D. and Thoma, D. J., to be published in Scripta Met. (1997) .Google Scholar
Gonis, A.et al., J. Less Comm. Metals 168, (1991) 127144.10.1016/0022-5088(91)90040-BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teter, D., et al., New Techniques for Characterizing Corrosion and Stress Corrosion (TMS, 1996), pp. 5371.Google Scholar
Lee, T. C., et al., Rev. Sci. Inst. 62, (1991) 14381444.10.1063/1.1142464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, E., et al., Acta Met. 27, (1979) 841853.10.1016/0001-6160(79)90119-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar