Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T07:42:37.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Numerical study of cavitating flow inside a flush valve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2012

Annie-Claude Bayeul-Lainé*
Affiliation:
Arts et Métiers Paristech, LML, UMR CNRS 8107, 8 boulevard Louis XIV, 59046 Lille Cedex, France
Sophie Simonet
Affiliation:
Arts et Métiers Paristech, LML, UMR CNRS 8107, 8 boulevard Louis XIV, 59046 Lille Cedex, France
Daniel Dutheil
Affiliation:
PRESTO, 4 rue Lavoisier, 17110 Saint Georges de Didonne, France
Guy Caignaert
Affiliation:
Arts et Métiers Paristech, LML, UMR CNRS 8107, 8 boulevard Louis XIV, 59046 Lille Cedex, France
*
aCorresponding author: annie-claude.bayeul@ensam.eu
Get access

Abstract

In water supply installations, noise pollution often occurs. As a basic component of a system, a flush valve may frequently be a source of noise and vibration generated by cavitation or high turbulence levels. During valve closing or valve opening, cavitation can be a problem. In order to decrease the noise and to improve the design inside a flush valve, some experimental and numerical analyses were carried out in our laboratories. These analyses led to some improvements in the design of the valves. Cavitation occurrence was more specifically addressed, using numerical simulation, and this is the main aim of the present paper. Particularly, the use of a simplified numerical test without cavitation model is compared with one using a cavitation model. In order to define potential cavitation risks in some parts of the valve, it has been found that a simplified approach provides an accurate overview. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of cavitating flow of water through an industrial flush valve were performed using the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with a near-wall turbulence model. The flow was assumed turbulent, incompressible and steady. Two commercial CFD codes (Fluent 6.3 and Star CCM+ 3.04.009) were used to analyse the effects of inlet pressure as well as mesh size and mesh type on cavitation intensity in the flush valve.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© AFM, EDP Sciences 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NF EN 12541, Pressure flushing valves and automatic closing urinal valves (PN10), ICS 91.140.70, 2003
BS EN ISO 3822-3/A1, Acoustic laboratory tests on noise emission from appliances and equipment used in water supply installations, 1997
Romeu, J., Jiménez, S., Capdevilla, R., Noise emitted by water supply installations, Applied Acoustics 65 (2004) 401419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Y. Lecoffre, Cavitation Bubbles Trackers, Balkema. 399 pp. ISBN 90 5410 783 9. 75 Hfl., 1999
C.E. Brennen, Cavitation and bubbles dynamics, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-509409, 1995, pp. 291
Gao, H., Fu, X., Yang, H., Tsukiji, T., Numerical investigation of cavitating flow behind a poppet valve in water hydraulic system, Journal of Zheijang University Science V3 4 (2002) 395400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluent documentation user’s guide
Star CCM +  documentation
A.H. Chorin, Numerical Solution of Navier-Stokes equations, Mathematics of computation, 1968, 22-745-762
Demirdzic, I., Lilek, Z., Peric, M., A collocated finite volume method for predicting flows at all speeds, Int. J. Num. Methods Fluids 16 (1993) 10291050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
I. Demirdzic, S. Musaferija, Numerical method for coupled fluid flow, heat transfer and stress analysis using unstructured moving meshes with cells of arbitrary topology, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. (1995) 1–21
J.H. Ferziger, M. Peric, M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd rev. ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002
Mathur, S.R., Murthy, J.Y., Pressure-based method for unstructured meshes, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals 31 (1997) 195214 Google Scholar
Mathur, S.R., Murthy, J.Y., Pressure boundary conditions for incompressible flow using unstructured meshes, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals 32 (1997) 283298 Google Scholar
Peric, M., Kressler, R., Scheuerer, G., Comparison of finite-volume numerical methods with staggered and colocated grids, Computers & Fluids 16 (1988) 389403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launder, B.E., Spalding, D.B., The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows, Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 3 (1974) 269289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D.C. Wilcox, Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, California, 1998
A.K. Singhal, H.Y. Li, M.M. Athavale, Y. Jiang, Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model, ASME FEDSM’01, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2001
Reichardt, H., Vollstaendige Darstellung der turbulenten Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in glatten Leitungen, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 31 (1951) 208-219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfstein, M., The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 12 (1969) 301318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
T.H. Shih, W.W. Liou, A. Shabbir, Z. Yang, J. Zhu, A New k-ε Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows – Model Development and Validation”, NASA TM 106721, 1994
J. Sauer, Instationaer kavitierende Stroemungen – Ein neues Modell, basierend auf Fron Capturing VOF und Blasendynamik, Dissertation, Universitaet Karlsruhe, 2000
S.B. Pope Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 771, ISBN 0-521-59886-9