Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T19:27:08.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concerning nilpotent wreath products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Hans Liebeck
Affiliation:
Department of MathematicsUniversity of KeeleStaffordshire

Extract

In a recent paper, (2), Baumslag showed that a wreath product of A by B is nilpotent if and only if A and B are nilpotent p-groups for the same prime p, with A of finite exponent and B finite. We shall calculate the (nilpotency) class of such groups when A and B are Abelian. This provides a lower bound for the class in the general case. We give a simple construction for a set of non-nilpotent metabelian groups which satisfy a finite Engel condition. With Engel class defined by Definition 6·1, we show that there are nilpotent groups of arbitrarily large nilpotency class for which the nilpotency class is equal to the Engel class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Baer, R., Nilpotent groups and their generalizations. Trans. American Math. Soc. 47 (1940), 393434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Baumslag, G., Wreath products and p-groups. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 55 (1959), 224231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Cohn, P. M., A non-nilpotent Lie ring satisfying the Engel condition, and a non-nilpotent Engel group. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51 (1955), 401405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Gruenberg, K. W., Two theorems on Engel groups. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 49 (1953), 377380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Gruenberg, K. W., Residual properties of infinite soluble groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 7 (1957), 2962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Gruenberg, K. W., The Engel elements of a soluble group. Illinois J. Math. 3 (1959), 151168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar