Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:50:21.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reframing the Compositional Capability: A Resource-Based View on ‘A Composition-Based View of Firm Growth’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Henk W. Volberda  and
Emre Karali
Henk W. Volberda
Affiliation:
Erasmus University, The Netherlands
Emre Karali
Affiliation:
Erasmus University, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This commentary targets the core ideas of the composition-based view (CBV). First, we argue that the deployment of compositional capabilities (CCs) to combine ordinary resources fits the resource-based view (RBV) and that there is therefore no need for a CBV. Second, we argue that the CCs should be presented as a specific type of dynamic capability (DC). We show that even where ordinary resources are being combined, superior combinatory capabilities are needed as competitive advantage cannot otherwise be achieved. Third, we argue that Luo and Child (2015) focused too much on the emerging economy enterprises (EEEs) as the conceptual setting. We conclude with a future research agenda to prepare the ground for research on compositional capabilities within the composition-based view of the firm.

Keywords

competitive advantagecomposition-based viewcompositional capabilitiesdynamic capabilitiesresource-based viewresourcesroutines
Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 11 , Issue 3: Special Issue Building Sustainable Organizations in China , September 2015 , pp. 419 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. 2001. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27: 643–650.Google Scholar
Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2011. Rational heuristics: The ‘Simple Rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1437–1464.Google Scholar
Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2014. Response to Vuori and Vuori's commentary on ‘Heuristics in the strategy context’. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1698–1702.Google Scholar
Carnabuci, G., & Operti, E. (2013). Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1591–1613.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1105–1121.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11: 611–629.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94–118.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. A., & Peteraf, M. A. 2003. The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal: 24. 997–1010.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. A., & Winter, S. G. 2011. Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1243–1250.Google Scholar
Javidan, M. 1998. Core competence: What does it mean in practice? Long Range Planning, 31: 60–71.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm: Combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3 (3): 383–397.Google Scholar
Luo, Y., & Child, J. A composition-based view of firm growth. Management and Organization Review, 11 (3): 379–411.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 363–380.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parmigiani, A., & Howard-Grenville, J. 2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 5: 413–453.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Haerem, T., & Hillison, D. 2011. The (n)ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22: 1369–1383.Google Scholar
Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179–191.Google Scholar
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26: 22–40.Google Scholar
Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. The multifaced nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18: 20–38.Google Scholar
Teece, D. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533.Google Scholar
Teece, D. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1319–1350.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & De Boer, M. 1999. Co-evolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10: 551–568.Google Scholar
Volberda, H. W. 1996. Towards the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7: 359–387.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171–180.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 991–995.Google Scholar