Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T07:39:13.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconceptualizing and Redirecting Research on Guanxi: ‘Guan-Xi’ Interaction to Form a Multicolored Chinese Knot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Peter Ping Li ,
Steven Shijin Zhou ,
Abby Jingzi Zhou Open the ORCID record for Abby Jingzi Zhou [Opens in a new window]  and
Zhangbo Yang
Peter Ping Li
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham Ningbo China, China Center for Creative Leadership, USA Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Steven Shijin Zhou
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham Ningbo China, China
Abby Jingzi Zhou
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham Ningbo China, China
Zhangbo Yang*
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
*
Corresponding author: Zhangbo Yang (yang_zb@xjtu.edu.cn)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Guanxi is one of the most popular topics in Chinese and Western scholarship concerning social ties in China. However, several problems in research on guanxi persist, and multiple debates are still ongoing without much consensus in sight. This study has two goals. First, we offer a systematic review of the current literature on guanxi, especially by differentiating guan dyads from xi networks. This reconceptualization of guanxi enables us to clarify the concept of guanxi by differentiating its two dimensions. Second, based on this literature review, we propose a redirection of future research on guanxi such that guan dyads and xi networks are not examined in isolation; rather, their holistic and dynamic interaction is the most fruitful avenue for future research, especially the four mechanisms of their interaction. The proposed reconceptualization and redirection are our two contributions to the literature.

摘要

“关系” (guanxi) 是中西方学者最关心的话题之一。然而，“关系”研究尚有许多问题亟待解答。本研究聚焦两个研究目的：首先，我们从双边联结视角（dyadic tie, 即“关”视角）和多边网络视角（social network, 即“系”视角）系统回顾已有的“关系”研究。“关系”概念的重构帮助我们从两个不同维度厘清“关系”的内在逻辑。其次，根据文献回顾的结果，我们提出未来“关系” 的研究方向，即不应孤立地研究双边联结与多边网络，而应聚焦于“关”与“系”二者之间整体性与动态性交互，尤其是本文提出的四个核心互动机制。这正是本研究的两大贡献。

Аннотация

Guanxi является одним из самых популярных вопросов в китайских и западных исследованиях, которые посвящены социальным отношениям в Китае. Тем не менее, некоторые проблемы в исследованиях по guanxi сохраняются, и многочисленные дебаты все еще продолжаются без особой надежды на достижение согласия. Данная работа ставит перед собой две цели. Во-первых, мы предлагаем систематический обзор существующей литературы по guanxi, на основании различия между guan диадами и xi связями. Это переосмысление концепции guanxi позволяет нам прояснить понятие guanxi и выделить два аспекта этого понятия. Во-вторых, на основании обзора литературы, мы предлагаем новое направление для будущих исследований guanxi с той целью, чтобы guan диады и xi связи не рассматривались по отдельности; напротив, изучение их целостного и динамичного взаимодействия является наиболее плодотворным направлением для будущих исследований, в особенности изучение четырех механизмов их взаимодействия. Переосмысление концепции и новое направление для исследований – два наших вклада в научную литературу.

Resumen

El guanxi es uno de los temas más comunes en la academia China y Occidental con relación a los lazos sociales en China. Sin embargo, muchos problemas en la investigación sobre guanxi persistente, y múltiples debates aún continúan sin mucho consenso a la vista. Este estudio tiene dos metas. Primero, ofrecemos una revisión sistemática de la actual literatura sobre guanxi, especialmente al diferenciar las diadas guan de las redes xi. Esta re-conceptualización de guanxi nos permite clarificar el concepto de guanxi al diferenciar sus dos dimensiones. Segundo, con base en esta revisión de literatura, proponemos una re-dirección de la investigación futura sobre guanxi como que las diadas guan y las redes xi no son examinadas de manera aislada; más bien, su interacción holística y dinámica es la avenida más fructífera para la investigación futura, especialmente los cuatro mecanismos de contribuciones a la literatura. La re-conceptualización y la re-dirección propuesta son nuestras dos contribuciones a la literatura.

Keywords

guanxiguan dyadguan-xi interactionmulticolor Chinese knotxi network“关系” (guanxi)双边“关”联系多边“系”网络“关”“系”交互五彩中华结guanxiguan диадаguan-xi взаимодействиемногоцветный китайский узелxi связиguanxidiada guaninteracción guan-xinodo chino multicolorred xi
Type
Perspectives
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 15 , Special Issue 3: The Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in India , September 2019 , pp. 643 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Accepted by: Editor-in-Chief Arie Y. Lewin

References

REFERENCES

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17–40.Google Scholar
Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. 2012. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2); 434–448.Google Scholar
Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439): 509–512.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Tucker, J. S. 2007. Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3): 707–721.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. J. 1994. Guanxi and the allocation of urban jobs in China. The China Quarterly, 140: 971–999.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. J. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3): 366–385.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. J. 2001. Guanxi capital and social eating: Theoretical models and empirical analyses. In Lin, N., Cook, K. S., & Burt, R. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research: 275–295. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. J. 2008. Born out of networks: A sociological analysis of the emergence of the firm. In Wong, R. S. (Ed.), Chinese entrepreneurship in a global era: 166–182. Oxon, UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. J. 2018. The prevalence and the increasing significance of guanxi. The China Quarterly, 235: 597–621.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. J., Huang, X. B., & Zhang, L. 2015. Information and favoritism: The network effect on wage income in China. Social Networks, 40: 129–138.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B. 2007. Comparative social capital: Networks of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in China and Russia. Management and Organization Review, 3(3): 397–419.Google Scholar
Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 600–628.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. The social structure of competition. In Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.), Networks and organizational structure, form and action: 57–91. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2019. Network disadvantages entrepreneurs: Density, hierarchy, and success in China and the West. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1): 19–50.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Burzynska, K. 2017. Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 12(2): 221–260.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. 1995. Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7(3): 255–292.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. 2017. Early network events in the later success of Chinese entrepreneurs. Management and Organization Review, 13(3): 497–537.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Bian, Y., & Opper, S. 2018. More or less guanxi: Trust is 60% network context, 10% individual difference. Social Networks, 54: 12–25.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, Y. R., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2): 200–209.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Huang, S. 2013. Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1): 167–207.Google Scholar
Chen, I., & Easterby-Smith, M. 2008. Is guanxi still working, while Chinese MNCs go global? The case of Taiwanese MNCs in the UK. Human Systems Management, 27(2): 131–142.Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Gable, G. G. 2013. Larger or broader: Performance implications of size and diversity of the knowledge worker's egocentric network. Management and Organization Review, 9(1): 139–165.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., & Sun, F. 2011. Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4): 715–735.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. F., & Tjosvold, D. 2006. Participative leadership by western managers in China: The role of relationships. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8): 1727–1752.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. 2009. Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, H., Leung, T. K., Luk, S. T., & Wong, Y. H. 1995. The benefits of guanxi: The value of relationships in developing the Chinese market. Industrial Marketing Management, 24(3): 207–214.Google Scholar
De Pablos, P. O. 2005. Western and Eastern views on social networks. The Learning Organization, 12(5): 436–456.Google Scholar
Dickson, B. J. 1993. The lessons of defeat: The reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950–52. The China Quarterly, 133: 56–84.Google Scholar
Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. 2001. Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3): 191–204.Google Scholar
Fan, Y. 2002. Guanxi's consequences: Personal gains at social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(4): 371–380.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471–488.Google Scholar
Fei, X. T. 1992/1947. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferriani, S., Fonti, F., & Corrado, R. 2013. The social and economic bases of network multiplexity: Exploring the emergence of multiplex ties. Strategic Organization, 11(1): 7–34.Google Scholar
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., & Dess, G. G. 2006. The dynamics of guanxi in Chinese high-tech firms: Implications for knowledge management and decision making. Management International Review, 46(3): 277–305.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.Google Scholar
Gu, F. F., Hung, K., & Tse, D. K. 2008. When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 12–28.Google Scholar
Gu, W., Luo, J. D., & Liu, J. 2019. Exploring small-world network with an elite-clique: Bringing embeddedness theory into the dynamic evolution of a venture capital network. Social Networks, 57: 70–81.Google Scholar
Guo, C., & Miller, J. K. 2010. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 267–291.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China's economic transition. The China Quarterly, 154: 254–282.Google Scholar
Halevy, N., Halali, E., & Zlatev, J. J. 2019. Brokerage and brokering: An integrative review and organizing framework for third party influence. Academy of Management Annuals, 13(1): 215–239Google Scholar
Han, Y., & Altman, Y. 2009. Supervisor and subordinate guanxi: A grounded investigation in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2): 91–104.Google Scholar
Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 275–286.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y. F. 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4): 867–884.Google Scholar
Horak, S., & Taube, M. 2016. Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 595–616.Google Scholar
Horak, S., Taube, M., Yang, I., & Restel, K. 2019. Two not of a kind: Social network theory and informal social networks in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, forthcoming. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9602-z.Google Scholar
Hu, H. C. 1944. The Chinese concept of ‘face’. American Anthropologist, 46(1): 45–64.Google Scholar
Huang, H., Tang, J., & Liu, L. 2017. Analysis and prediction of triadic closure in online social networks. In Fu, X. M., Luo, J. D., & Boos, M. (Eds.), Social network analysis: 121–152. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4): 944–974.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. B. 1979. A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch'ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 78: 237–273.Google Scholar
Karhunen, P., Kosonen, R., McCarthy, D. J., & Puffer, S. M. 2018. The darker side of social networks in transforming economies: Corrupt exchange in Chinese guanxi and Russian blat/svyazi. Management and Organization Review, 14(2): 395–419.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. 1999. The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16(1): 183–210.Google Scholar
Law, K., Wong, C., Wang, D., & Wang, L. 2000. Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4): 751–765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190050075105.Google Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Fey, C. F., Levine, S. S., McDermott, G., Murmann, J. P., & Tsang, E. 2016. The critique of empirical social science: New policies at management and organization review. Management and Organization Review, 12(4): 649–658.Google Scholar
Lee, D. J., Pae, J. H., & Wong, Y. H. 2001. A model of close business relationships in China (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2): 51–69.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 1998. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19(5): 829–861.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2007. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2): 227–246.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 413–439.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2016. The global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply yin-yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(1): 42–77.Google Scholar
Li, P. P., & Xie, E. 2019. The unique research on the informal social networks in East Asia: Diverse perspectives and new research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Li, S. X., Yao, X., Sue-Chen, C., & Xi, Y. M. 2011. Where do social ties come from: Institutional framework and governmental tie distribution among Chinese managers. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 97–124.Google Scholar
Liang, S. 1986. The essential meanings of Chinese culture. Hong Kong: Zheng Zhong Press.Google Scholar
Lin, D.-M., Lu, J.-Y., Li, P. P., & Liu, X.-H. 2015. Balancing formality and informality in business exchanges as a duality: A comparative case study of returnee and local entrepreneurs in China. Management and Organization Review, 11(2): 315–342.Google Scholar
Lin, N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 467–487.Google Scholar
Lin, N. 2001. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lomi, A., & Pattison, P. 2006. Manufacturing relations: An empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organization Science, 17(3): 313–332.Google Scholar
Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. 1999. Guanxi versus the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2): 231–247.Google Scholar
Luo, J. D. 2011. Guanxi revisited: An exploratory study of familial ties in a Chinese workplace. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 329–351.Google Scholar
Luo, J. D., & Yeh, Y. C. 2012. Neither collectivism nor individualism: Trust in the Chinese guanxi circle. Journal of Trust Research, 2(1): 53–70.Google Scholar
Luo, J. D., Cheng, M. Y., & Zhang, T. 2016. Guanxi circle and organizational citizenship behavior: Context of a Chinese workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 649–671.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. D. 1997. Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical inquiry. Management International Review, 37(1): 51–70.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. D., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 139–172.Google Scholar
Ma, D. 2015. Social belonging and economic action: Affection-based social circles in the creation of private entrepreneurship. Social Forces, 94(1): 87–114.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 20–38.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 100–130.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Opper, S., Nee, V., & Holm, H. J. 2017. Risk aversion and guanxi activities: A behavioral analysis of CEOs in China. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4): 1504–1530.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. D. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5): 455–477.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–296.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. D. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486–501.Google Scholar
Portes, A. 1998. Social Capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1–24.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. 2012. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prato, M., Kypraios, E., Ertug, G., & Lee, Y. G. 2019. Middle-status conformity revisited: The interplay between achieved and ascribed status. Academy of Management Journal, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 1993. The prosperous community. American Prospect, 7(Spring): 35–42.Google Scholar
Qi, X. 2013. Guanxi, social capital theory and beyond: Toward a globalized social science. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(2): 308–324.Google Scholar
Rank, O. N., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. 2010. Structural logic of intraorganizational networks. Organization Science, 21(3): 745–764.Google Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Redding, S. G., & Wong, G. Y. Y. 1986. The psychology of Chinese organizational behavior. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people: 213–266. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. 2012. The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organization Science, 23(2): 472–491.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. 1950. The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Standifird, S. S., & Marshall, R. S. 2000. The transaction cost advantage of guanxi-based business practices. Journal of World Business, 35(1): 21–42.Google Scholar
Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. 2010. A research model for guanxi behavior: Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social Science Research, 39(6): 1195–1212.Google Scholar
Tsang, W. K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantages for doing business in China. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 64–73.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1): 56–79.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4): 674–698.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.Google Scholar
Verbrugge, L. M. 1979. Multiplexity in adult friendships. Social Forces, 57(4): 1286–1309.Google Scholar
Wang, C. L. 2007. Guanxi vs. relationship marketing: Exploring underlying differences. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(1): 81–86.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684): 440–442.Google Scholar
Woolcock, M. 1998. Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2): 151–208.Google Scholar
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1641–1658.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. 1993. Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In Cheng, L. Y., Cheung, F. M. C., & Chen, C. N. (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected papers from the first international conference: 19–56. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, M. M. 2002. The resilience of guanxi and its new deployments: A critique of some new guanxi scholarship. The China Quarterly, 170: 459–476.Google Scholar
Yan, Y. X. 1996. The culture of guanxi in a North China village. The China Journal, 35: 1–25.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. 1994. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129–166.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Yamagishi, M., Takahashi, N., Hayashi, N., & Watabe, M. 1995. Trust and commitment: An experiment. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35: 23–34. (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. 1998. Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1): 165–94.Google Scholar
Yeung, I. Y., & Tung, R. L. 1996. Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25(2): 54–65.Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Deng, Y., Zhang, X., & Hu, E. 2016. Why do Chinese employees build supervisor-subordinate guanxi? A motivational analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(36): 17–648.Google Scholar
Zhao, C., & Burt, R. 2018. A note on business survival and social networks. Management and Organization Review, 14(2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Zhou, A. J., Lapointe, É., & Zhou, S. S. 2018. Understanding mentoring relationships in China: Towards a Confucian model. Asia Pacific Journal of Management: 1–30.Google Scholar