Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78bd46657c-j4m62 Total loading time: 0.316 Render date: 2021-05-06T11:06:58.822Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

STATUS PREFERENCE AND THE EFFECTS OF PATENT PROTECTION: THEORY AND EVIDENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2016

Shiyuan Pan
Affiliation:
Zhejiang University
Mengbo Zhang
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Heng-Fu Zou
Affiliation:
Central University of Finance and Economics
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

We construct a growth model with status preference to explore the effects of patents on innovation and social welfare. We find a nonmonotonic effect of patent protection on innovation. Additionally, the growth-rate-maximizing degree of patent protection decreases when the strength of status preference is larger. The effect of patent protection on social welfare is ambiguous, depending on the strength of status preference. Moreover, wealth inequality widens as patent protection is reinforced. Finally, by using cross-section regression analysis, we document that a nonmonotonic relationship between patent protection and economic growth is statistically significant and that the growth-rate-maximizing degree of patent protection decreases with the strength of status preference.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the associate editor and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. S. Pan acknowledges financial support from the Key Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 15AJY003), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-0453) and the Project of the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars of Ministry of Education of China. Zhang acknowledges financial support from the State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Adams, S. (2008) Globalization and income inequality: Implications for intellectual property rights. Journal of Policy Modeling 30, 725735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakshi, G. S. and Chen, Z. (1996) The spirit of capitalism and stock market prices. American Economic Review 86, 133157.Google Scholar
Barro, R. (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 407443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. and Lee, J.-W. (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics 104, 184198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S. (1996) Procyclical productivity: Increasing returns or cyclical utilization? Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 719751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S. and Fernald, J. (1997) Returns to scale in U.S. production: Estimates and implications. Journal of Political Economy 105, 249283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. (2009) Effects of blocking patents on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth 14, 5578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A., Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2012) Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation? European Economic Review 56, 727746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, A. and Pan, S. (2013) The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 955969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneo, G. and Jeanne, O. (1997) On relative wealth effects and the optimality of growth. Economics Letters, 54, 8792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2011) Upstream Innovation Protection: Common Law Evolution and the Dynamics of Wage Inequality. MPRA paper no. 31902.Google Scholar
Dorius, S. and Baker, W. (2012) The Spirit of Capitalism, Economic Development, and National Wealth. Population Studies Center Research report, 12-711.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In David, P. A. and Reder, M. W. (eds.), National and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. (1995) Will raising incomes increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falvey, R., Foster, N. and Greenaway, D. (2006) Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics 10, 700719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furukawa, Y. (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, 36443670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futagami, K. and Iwaisako, T. (2007) Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory 132, 306334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futagami, K. and Shibata, A. (1998) Keeping one step ahead of the Joneses: Status, the distribution of wealth, and long run growth. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 36, 109126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginarte, J. and Park, W. (1997) Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy 26, 283301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, A.-T. and Olivier, F. (2002) Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review 43, 11911214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, D. and Gruden, W. (1996) The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics 48, 323350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. and Scotchmer, S. (1995) On the division of profit in sequential innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 26, 2033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. and Zingales, L. (2006) Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, 2348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffetz, O. and Frank, R. (2010) The preferences for status: Evidence and economic implications. In Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., and Jackson, M. (eds.), Handbook of Social Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Heston, A., Summers, R. and Aten, B. (2012) Penn World Table Version 7.1[DB/OL]. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed., Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Neddich, P. (eds.). London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kanwar, S. and Evenson, R. (2003) Does intellectual property protection spur technological change? Oxford Economic Papers 55, 235264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1930) Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In Keynes, J. M. (ed.), Essays in Persuasion, pp. 358373. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. (reprinted 1963).Google Scholar
Kwan, Y. and Lai, E. (2003) Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 27, 853873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitner, J. and Stolyarov, D. (2004) Aggregate returns to scale and embodied technical change: Theory and measurement using stock market data. Journal of Monetary Economics 51, 191233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrance, E. (1991) Poverty and the rate of time preference: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy 99, 5477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Smith, W. and Zou, H. (2009) The spirit of capitalism, precautionary savings, and consumption. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41, 543554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S. and Thisse, J. F. (1998) Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 7, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, T. and Zweimuller, J. (2004). Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 81123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, W. (2005) Do intellectual property rights stimulate R&D and productivity growth? evidence from cross-national and manufacturing industries data. In Putnam, J. (ed.), Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Ottawa: Industry Canada.Google Scholar
Park, W. (2008) International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research Policy 37, 761766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, W. and Ginarte, J. (1997) Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy 15, 5161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, L. and Romer, P. (1991) Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, P. (2005) International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 78, 529547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotchmer, S. (1996) Protecting early innovators: should second-generation products be patentable? RAND Journal of Economics 27, 322331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, I. and Whinston, M. (2007) Antitrust in innovative industries. American Economic Review 97, 17031730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. (1999) Risk, the spirit of capitalism, and long-term growth. Journal of Macroeconomics 21, 241262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. (2001) How does the spirit of capitalism affect stock-market prices? Review of Financial Studies 14, 12151232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varsakelis, N. (2001) The impact of patent protection, economy openness and national culture on R&D investment: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy 30, 10591068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2013) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
WVS (2015) World Value Survey 1981–2015 Official Aggregate v.20150418. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.us). Aggregate File Producer: JD Systems, Madrid.Google Scholar
Zou, H. (1994) The spirit of capitalism and long-run growth. European Journal of Political Economy 10, 279293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, H. (1995) The spirit of capitalism and savings behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28, 131143.Google Scholar
Zou, H. (1998) The spirit of capitalism, social status, money, and accumulation. Journal of Economics 68, 219233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Pan supplementary material

Appendices A and B

Download Pan supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 155 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

STATUS PREFERENCE AND THE EFFECTS OF PATENT PROTECTION: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

STATUS PREFERENCE AND THE EFFECTS OF PATENT PROTECTION: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

STATUS PREFERENCE AND THE EFFECTS OF PATENT PROTECTION: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *