Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T02:07:10.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Type studies in the Rhizocarpon geographicum group (Rhizocarpaceae, lichenized Ascomycota)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

Beatriz ROCA-VALIENTE ,
David L. HAWKSWORTH ,
Sergio PÉREZ-ORTEGA ,
Leopoldo G. SANCHO  and
Ana CRESPO
Beatriz ROCA-VALIENTE
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal S/N, Madrid E-28040, Spain. Email: brocaval@ucm.es
David L. HAWKSWORTH
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal S/N, Madrid E-28040, Spain. Email: brocaval@ucm.es
Sergio PÉREZ-ORTEGA
Affiliation:
Real Jardín Botánico de Madrid, CSIC, Claudio Moyano 1, Madrid, E-28014, Spain
Leopoldo G. SANCHO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal S/N, Madrid E-28040, Spain. Email: brocaval@ucm.es
Ana CRESPO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal S/N, Madrid E-28040, Spain. Email: brocaval@ucm.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As part of a comprehensive revision of the Rhizocarpon geographicum species group using molecular and morphological approaches, we examined the name-bearing types of 15 species. We report ambiguities and inconsistencies with the reported features of some type specimens, original descriptions, and circumscriptions employed in keys for the identification of taxa within the complex. The reporting of chemical reactions and some morphological characters was found to be inconsistent and likely to lead to errors of identification. This is unfortunate in view of the widespread use of the complex in glaciology for lichenometry. Issues surrounding the typification of the basionym Lichen geographicus are clarified, and the epitype is illustrated. The complex nomenclatural situation regarding the name Rhizocarpon lecanorinum and its typification is also made clear. The examination of the anatomical and morphological characters presented here needs to be considered together with molecular phylogenetic information to provide a more informed new taxonomy of the group.

Keywords

chemical spot testslichenometrylichensnomenclaturetypification
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 97 - 110
Copyright
© British Lichen Society, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, J. (1923) Zur Flechtenflora des Isergebirges. Hedwigia 64: 256–267.Google Scholar
Bradwell, T. & Armstrong, R. A. (2007) Growth rates of Rhizocarpon geographicum lichens: a review with new data from Iceland. Journal of Quaternary Science 22: 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayden, S. (2004) The yellow-pigmented taxa of Rhizocarpon (lichen-forming Ascomycota) in Snowdonia, North Wales: diversity and life history studies. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Dillenius, J. J. (1742) [1741] Historia Muscorum. Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre.Google Scholar
Feuerer, T. (1978) Zur Kenntnis der Flechtengattung Rhizocarpon in Bayern. Berichte der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft 49: 59–135.Google Scholar
Fletcher, A., Gilbert, O. L., Clayden, S. & Fryday, A. M. (2009) Rhizocarpon Ramond ex DC. (1805). In The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland (C. W. Smith, A. Aptroot, B. J. Coppins, A. Fletcher, O. L. Gilbert, P. W. James & P. A. Wolseley, eds): 792–888. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Flörke, H. G. (1819) Deutsche Lichenen gesammelt und mit Anmerkungen herausgeben. Part 4. Rostock.Google Scholar
Foucard, T. (2001) Svenska Skorplavar och swampar som växer på dem. Stockholm: Interpublishing.Google Scholar
Hafellner, J. (1984) Studien in Richtung einer natürlichen Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae . Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 79: 241–371.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. & Sowter, F. A. (1969) Leicestershire and Rutland lichens, 1950–1969. Transactions of the Leicester Literary and Philosophical Society 63: 50–61.Google Scholar
Honegger, R. (1979) Ascocarpontogenie, Ascusstruktur und -funktion bei Vertretern der Gattung Rhizocarpon . Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 91: 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honegger, R. (1980) The ascus apex in lichenized fungi II. The Rhizocarpon-type. Lichenologist 12: 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihlen, P. G. (2004) Taxonomy of the non-yellow species of Rhizocarpon (Rhizocarpaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) in the Nordic countries, with hyaline and muriform ascospores. Mycological Research 108: 533–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ihlen, P. G. & Ekman, S. (2002) Outline of phylogeny and character evolution in Rhizocarpon (Rhizocarpaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) based on nuclear ITS and mitochondrial SSU ribosomal DNA sequences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77: 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, J. L. (1986) The size-frequency distributions of the lichens Sporastatia testudinea and Rhizocarpon alpicola through time at Storbreen, south-west Norway. Journal of Biogeography 13: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, P. M., James, P. W. & Jarvis, C. E. (1994) Linnaean lichen names and their typification. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 115: 261–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körber, G. W. (1854–55) Systema Lichenum Germaniae. Breslau: Trewendt & Gaenier.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1753) Species Plantarum Vol. 2. Stockholm: L. Salvius.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T. & Huhndorf, S. M. (2010) Myconet Volume 14. Part One. Outline of Ascomycota—2009. Part Two. Notes on Ascomycete Systematics. Nos. 4751–5113. Fieldiana, Life and Earth Sciences 1: 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J. et al. (eds) (2012) International Code of Botanical Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code) [Regnum Vegetabile no. 154.]. Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.Google Scholar
Magnusson, A. H. (1948) New or otherwise interesting Swedish lichens XIII. Botaniska Notiser 101: 401–412.Google Scholar
Massalongo, A. B. (1852) Recherche sull'autonomia dei licheni crostosi. e materiali pella loro naturale ordinazione. Verona: A. Frizierio.Google Scholar
Matwiejuk, A. (2008) Noteworthy species of the genus Rhizocarpon Ramond ex DC. (Rhizocarpaceae, lichenized Ascomycota). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 63: 79–92.Google Scholar
Miądlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., Gaya, E., Hafellner, J., Hofstetter, V., Gueidan, C. et al. (2014) A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79: 132–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osborn, G., McCarthy, D., LaBrie, A. & Burke, R. (2015) Lichenometric dating: science or pseudo-science? Quaternary Research 83: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Øvstedal, D. O. & Smith, L. (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poelt, J. (1988) Rhizocarpon Ram. em. Th. Fr. subgen. Rhizocarpon in Europe. Arctic and Alpine Research 20: 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räsänen, V. (1942 a) Rhizocarpon geographicum (L.) DC. und ihre Verwandten in Finnland. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae “Vanamo” 16 (not. bot. 12): 46–62.Google Scholar
Räsänen, V. (1942 b) Zur Kenntnis der Flechtengattung Rhizocarpon . Revista Sudamericana de Botánica 7: 77–92.Google Scholar
Räsänen, V. (1943) Novae et minime notae species et variationes ex genere Rhizocarpon (Ram.) Th. Fr. Feddes Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis 52: 136–143.Google Scholar
Räsänen, V. (1944) Iterum novae quaedam species, variationes, formae flavae ex genere Rhizocarpon (Ram.) Th. Fr. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae “Vanamo” 19 (not.): 6–10.Google Scholar
Räsänen, V. (1947) Lichenes novi II. Annales Botanici Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae “Vanamo” 21 (not. 16): 1–7.Google Scholar
Räsänen, V. (1949) Lichenes Novi IV. Archivum Societatis Zoologicae Botanicae Fennicae “Vanamo” 3: 78–89.Google Scholar
Roca-Valiente, B. (2013) Phylogenetic study in the Rhizocarpon geographicum group (Lichens, Rhizocarpaceae, Ascomycota). Contrasting analysis of morphological characters and biogeographic patterns. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Runemark, H. (1956 a) Studies in Rhizocarpon I. Taxonomy of the yellow species in Europe. Opera Botanica 2: 1–152.Google Scholar
Runemark, H. (1956 b) Studies in Rhizocarpon II. Distribution and ecology of the yellow species in Europe. Opera Botanica 2: 1–150.Google Scholar
Sancho, L. G., Palacios, D., Green, A. T. G., Vivas, M. & Pintado, A. (2011) Extreme high lichen growth rates in recently deglaciated areas in Tierra del Fuego. Polar Biology 34: 813–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadler, M., Hawksworth, D. L. & Fournier, J. (2014) The application of the name Xylaria hypoxylon, based on Clavaria hypoxylon of Linnaeus. IMA Fungus 5: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomson, J. W. (1967) Notes on Rhizocarpon in the arctic. Nova Hedwigia 14: 421–481.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. W. (1997) American Arctic Lichens. Vol. 2. The Microlichens. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Timdal, E. & Holtan-Hartwig, J. (1988) A preliminary key to Rhizocarpon in Scandinavia. Graphis Scripta 2: 41–54.Google Scholar
Trenbirth, H. E. & Matthews, J. A. (2010) Lichen growth rates on glacier forelands in southern Norway: preliminary results from a 25-year monitoring programme. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography 92(1): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar