Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T23:05:51.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life on deadwood: cut stumps as a model system for the succession and management of lichen diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2014

Vérèna BLASY  and
Christopher J. ELLIS
Vérèna BLASY
Affiliation:
Mount Revelstoke and Glacier Field Unit, Parks Canada, P.O. Box 350, Revelstoke, B.C., V0E 2S0, Canada
Christopher J. ELLIS*
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK. Email: c.ellis@rbge.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coarse deadwood provides an important habitat for a suite of niche-specialist lichens in old-growth forests, for example, snags (standing dead trees) and fallen logs. Conversely, the scarcity of deadwood in managed forests is a limiting factor to lichen diversity, though cut stumps may provide an alternative habitat for deadwood species. The surface of cut stumps is an ecologically useful study system, facilitating standardized sampling with which to determine the pattern and process of deadwood succession. This study examined vegetation patterns for the surface of cut stumps at Abernethy RSPB Reserve in northern Scotland. We demonstrate the interrelationship between key topographic, management and edaphic factors during a successional process of terrestrialization. Consequently, we recommend that deadwood diversity might be maximized by 1) creating managed plots with varying degrees of canopy openness for sites with different levels of topographic exposure, and 2) providing cut stumps at different heights within plots, to ensure that during a rotational period the process of terrestrialization operates at different speeds among individual microhabitats. The study examined successional processes on cut stumps using two recently accessible and powerful statistical methods: 1) nonparametric multiplicative regression (NPMR), and 2) multivariate regression trees (MRT). The principles on which these techniques are based are becoming the preferred statistical framework with which to provide robust interpretation of field-sampled data; they are unconstrained by prior assumptions as to the form of a species' niche response, and are data-led models evaluated based on cross-validated performance, thereby avoiding the complication of multiple hypothesis tests.

Keywords

bryophytedeadwood managementmultivariate regression treesnonparametric multiplicative regressionterrestrialization
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 455 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. C., Loucks, O. L. & Swain, A. M. (1969) Herbaceous response to canopy cover, light intensity, and throughfall precipitation in coniferous forests. Ecology 50: 255–263.Google Scholar
Atherton, I., Bosanquet, S. & Lawley, M. (2010) Mosses and Liverworts of Britain and Ireland—A Field Guide. Plymouth: British Bryological Society.Google Scholar
Caruso, A. & Rudolphi, J. (2009) Influence of substrate age and quality on species diversity of lichens and bryophytes on stumps. Bryologist 112: 520–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, A., Rudolphi, J. & Thor, G. (2008) Lichen species diversity and substrate amounts in young planted boreal forests: a comparison between slash and stumps of Picea abies . Biological Conservation 141: 47–55.Google Scholar
Crites, S. & Dale, M. R. T. (1998) Diversity and abundance of bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in relation to woody substrate and successional stage in aspen mixedwood boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 641–651.Google Scholar
Daniels, F. J. A. (1993) Succession in lichen vegetation on Scots pine stumps. Phytocoenologia 23: 619–623.Google Scholar
De'ath, G. (2002) Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. Ecology 83: 1105–1117.Google Scholar
De'ath, G. & Fabricius, K. E. (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data anaysis. Ecology 81: 3178–3192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrêne, M. & Legendre, P. (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345–366.Google Scholar
Englund, S. R., O'Brien, J. J. & Clark, D. B. (2000) Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1999–2005.Google Scholar
Ferris, R. & Humphrey, J. W. (1999) A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests. Forestry 72: 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryday, A. M. (2009) Lecidea globulispora is the correct name for L. antiloga . Graphis scripta 21: 57–59.Google Scholar
Gardiner, B., Suárez, J., Achim, A., Hale, S. & Nicoll, B. (2006) ForestGALES v. 2.1: A PC-based Wind Risk Model for British Forests. Roslin: Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Gibb, H., Ball, J. P., Johansson, T., Atlegrim, O., Hjältén, J. & Danell, K. (2005) Effects of management on coarse woody debris volume and composition in boreal forests in northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20: 213–222.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O., Mountford, J. O., Roy, D. B. & Bunce, R. G. H. (1999) ECOFACT 2a Technical Annex—Ellenberg's Indicator Values for British Plants. Monks Wood: CEH.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. W., Davey, S., Peace, A. J., Ferris, R. & Harding, K. (2002) Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biological Conservation 107: 165–180.Google Scholar
Kirby, K. J., Reid, C. M., Thomas, R. C. & Goldsmith, F. B. (1998) Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 148–155.Google Scholar
Kranner, I., Beckett, R., Hochman, A. & Nash, T. H. III (2008) Desiccation tolerance in lichens: a review. Bryologist 111: 576–593.Google Scholar
Lemmon, P. E. (1956) A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. Forest Science 2: 314–320.Google Scholar
Lõhmus, P. & Lõhmus, A. (2001) Snags, and their lichen flora in old Estonian peatland forests. Annales Botanici Fennici 38: 265–280.Google Scholar
Lommi, S., Berglund, H., Kuusinen, M. & Kuuluvainen, T. (2010) Epiphytic lichen diversity in late-successional Pinus sylvestris forests along local and regional forest utilization gradients in eastern boreal Fennoscandia. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 883–892.Google Scholar
McCullough, H. A. (1948) Plant succession on fallen logs in a virgin spruce-fir forest. Ecology 29: 508–513.Google Scholar
McCune, B. (2006) Non-parametric habitat models with automatic interactions. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 819–830.Google Scholar
McCune, B. (2011) Nonparametric Multiplicative Regression for Habitat Modeling. http://home.centurytel.net/~mjm/NPMRintro.pdf Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Grace, J. B. (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. Geneden Beach: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Keon, D. (2002) Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 603–606.Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. (2009) Hyperniche v. 2.11: Nonparametric Multiplicative Habitat Modeling. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM software.Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. (2011) PC–ORD v. 6: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software.Google Scholar
McCune, B., Rosentreter, R., Ponzetti, J. M. & Shaw, D. C. (2000) Epiphyte habitats in an old conifer forest in western Washington, U.S.A. Bryologist 103: 417–427.Google Scholar
Meier, E. & Paal, J. (2009) Cryptogams in Estonian alvar forests: species composition and their substrata in stands of different age and management intensity. Annales Botanici Fennici 46: 1–20.Google Scholar
Moning, C., Werth, S., Dziock, F., Bässler, C., Bradtka, J., Hothorn, T. & Müller, J. (2009) Lichen diversity in temperate montane forests is influenced by forest structure more than climate. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 745–751.Google Scholar
Muhle, H. & LeBlanc, F. (1975) Bryophyte and lichen succession on decaying logs. I. Analysis along an evaporational gradient in eastern Canada. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 39: 1–33.Google Scholar
Nascimbene, J., Marini, L., Motta, R. & Nimis, P. L. (2008 a) Lichen diversity of coarse woody debris in a Pinus-Larix stand in the Italian Alps. Lichenologist 40: 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascimbene, J., Marini, L., Caniglia, G., Cester, D. & Nimis, P. L. (2008 b) Lichen diversity on stumps in relation to wood decay in subalpine forests of northern Italy. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 2661–2670.Google Scholar
North, M., Oakley, B., Fiegener, R., Gray, A. & Barbour, M. (2005) Influence of light and soil moisture on Sierran mixed-conifer understory communities. Plant Ecology 177: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ódor, P. & van Hees, A. F. M. (2004) Preferences of dead wood inhabiting bryophytes for decay stage, log size and habitat types in Hungarian beech forests. Journal of Bryology 26: 79–95.Google Scholar
Paletto, A. & Tosi, V. (2009) Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques. European Journal of Forest Research 128: 265–272.Google Scholar
Paltto, H., Nordén, B. & Götmark, F. (2008) Partial cutting as a conservation alternative for oak (Quercus spp.) forest - response of bryophytes and lichens on dead wood. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 536–547.Google Scholar
Paton, J. A. (1999) The Liverwort Flora of the British Isles. Colchester: Harley Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, C. P. & White, I. M. S. (1994) Using the relationship between rate of tatter and topographic variables to predict site windiness in upland Britain. Forestry 67: 345–356.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Smith, A. J. E. (2004) The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. W., Aptroot, A., Coppins, B. J., Fletcher, A., Gilbert, O. L., James, P. W. & Wolseley, P. A. (eds) (2009) The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Söderström, L. (1988) Sequence of bryophytes and lichens in relation to substrate variables of decaying coniferous wood in Northern Sweden. Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 89–97.Google Scholar
Spribille, T., Thor, G., Bunnell, F. L., Goward, T. & Björk, C. R. (2008) Lichens on dead wood: species-substrate relationships in the epiphytic lichen floras of the Pacific Northwest and Fennoscandia. Ecography 31: 741–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, J., Gardiner, B. & Quine, C. P. (1999) A comparison of three methods for predicting wind speeds in complex forested terrain. Meteorological Applications 6: 329–342.Google Scholar
Summers, R. W., Proctor, R., Raistrick, P. & Taylor, S. (1997) The structure of Abernethy Forest, Strathspey, Scotland. Botanical Journal of Scotland 49: 39–55.Google Scholar
Woods, R. G. & Coppins, B. J. (2012) A Conservation Evaluation of British Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
Yahr, R., Coppins, B. J. & Coppins, A. M. (2013) Transient populations in the British conservation priority lichen, Cladonia botrytes . Lichenologist 45: 265–276.Google Scholar