Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:04:29.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul Schiff Berman, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012, 344 pp., ISBN 9780521769822 (hb), £60.00, $99.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2013

Andraž Zidar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 483 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 No emphasis added.

2 He bases his thoughts on the work by B. Anderson, Imagined Communities (2006).

3 See J. L. Goldsmith and E. A. Posner, The Limits of International Law (2006).

4 B. Latour, Nous n'avons jamais été modernes (1997), 21, 22, 47, and 105. Also available in the English translation: We Have Never Been Modern (1993).

5 F. Ost and M. van der Kèrchove, De la pyramide au réseau? (2002), 15, 27, 31, and 127.

6 Classifications are to some degree always arbitrary. However, the realist thought of international law includes figures as diverse as Roscoe Pound, Myers McDougal, Max Huber, Georg Schwarzenberger, Hans Morgenthau, Abraham Chayes, Charles de Visscher, Paul Reuter, Rosalyn Higgins, Jean Salmon, Alain Pellet, Brigitte Stern, Michael Reisman, Michael Byers, China Mièville, and others.

7 Cover, R. M., ‘Violence and the Word’, (1986) 95 Yale Law Journal 1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 1601.

8 See ‘Living under Drones’, International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic, Stanford Law School, and Global Justice Clinic, NYU School of Law, September 2012, at http://livingunderdrones.org/report.

9 See the following cases of the European Court of Human Rights: Medvedyev and Others v. France (10 July 2008), Hirsi v. Italy (27 February 2012), Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom, and Al-Skeini v. the United Kingdom (7 July 2011).

10 On the notion of anomie see E. Durkheim, De la division du travail social (2004); and R. K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (1962), 131–94.

11 See Zupančić, B. M., ‘Criminal Law and Its Influence upon Normative Integration’ (1974) 7 Acta Criminologica, 53–105, at http://www.erudit.org/revue/ac/1974/v7/n1/017031ar.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 See N. Krisch, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (2010). See, e.g., a review of Krisch's book in this journal: de Boer, T., ‘Review Essay: The Limits of Legal Pluralism’ (2012) 25 LJIL, 543–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.